NewsDay (Zimbabwe)

Using communicat­ive power to influence climate policy

- Peter Makwanya ● Peter Makwanya is a climate change communicat­or. He writes in his personal capacity.

THE success or failure of any climate programme, at micro or macro level, lies in how issues of policy are articulate­d in order to bring the desired results in communitie­s. Climate policy is the biggest driver of desired change in communitie­s, through sign-posting and sufficient guidance. While everyone wants to witness positive outcomes in their communitie­s, it depends on how policy issues are communicat­ed in climate policy initiative­s. For communicat­ive power to be realised, it must not be discussed in isolation and viewed with wrong lenses. While climatic changes are what we see and interact with on daily basis, policy issues are designed to guide climate action strategies as communicat­ed strategica­lly and institutio­nally binding.

In order to bridge the implementa­tion divide, it is important not to change meanings and norms in order to conform to self-interest and desires.

If the climate policy idea is to upscale reforestat­ion and come up with carbon sinks to absorb greenhouse gases and reduce global warming, authoritie­s’ reasoning should not be influenced by what lies beneath the earth’s surface like minerals or fossil fuels.

Vision is the framework that shapes and transforms climate goals, using relevant userfriend­ly and human-centred communicat­ion tools, significan­t enough to reconnect communitie­s with their values, worldview, beliefs and practices as they relate to their local situations. If the vision is to be a 100% carbon emissionfr­ee country in the world and a habitation of choice, then all policy measures should translate to climate actions on the ground.

In dealing with climate policy issues, the communicat­ive power is harnessed in order to situate people as the greatest resources needed to get things done, tapping into their minds and hearts, as sources and ingredient­s for a human capital base.

The interdisci­plinary nature of climate change is always blurred by the absence of context-specific communicat­ion.

Communicat­ion becomes powerful when it is not used to divide the people’s attention and divert them from their local and global goals.

The goals of adaptation and mitigation cannot be separated from the people’s everyday transactio­ns and livelihood aspiration­s and options.

If done appropriat­ely, without being overweighe­d by the baggage of toxic human perception­s, communicat­ion becomes the master key that unlocks accelerate­d climate proof solutions, lifelong learning and skills.

These are instrument­al in solving climate problems, attaining community resilience and rapid socio-economic transforma­tion.

Communitie­s can only build strong infrastruc­ture and institutio­ns if communicat­ion is designed to expose institutio­ns with competing interests and duplicatio­n of roles and how they are driving the climate agenda into a climate paradox, marked by proved failures.

In this regard, climate policy messages should always be communicat­ed in order to have positive impacts on people’s understand­ing, attitudes and actions in regards to overall climate change discourses.

Wrongly communicat­ed and implemente­d climate policies, nurture and breed life-threatenin­g disasters and inconsiste­ncies, too much to expose planning failures and gaps.

It is the duty of communicat­ive power to help uncover climate policy incompeten­ce, blips, assumption­s and doublespea­k, especially from the authoritie­s, whom everyone would be investing their faith in for positive climate solutions which we all envisage.

If climate policies cannot situate communitie­s at the heart of climate actions then it is the duty of communicat­ive power to actively filter the kind of climate messages that reach the public, penetrate the social fabric and resonate well with their livelihood aspiration­s and options.

Placing people at the heart of climate action in sustainabl­e developmen­t issues is normally the missing critical key, to unlocking climate justice transition­s to a climate resilient world.

It is also significan­t that citizens are not just mentioned in passing, in policy documents but their participat­ion in public policy implementa­tion should be substantia­lly guaranteed.

Many nations and institutio­ns have proven to be weaker on policy implementa­tion and gaps due to indiscipli­ne, dearth of conscience and double-speaking.

This includes the widening gaps between their actions and words, which are very difficult to mask.

People require policies with climate narratives that reconnect them to their natural world and abide by the stories they are supposed to live by.

Responsibl­e authoritie­s need to continue keeping people sustainabl­y knowledgea­ble and having understand­ing of climate policy issues as a conscious cultivatio­n of eco-behaviours and be part of the voices of the earth for sustainabl­e living.

Communicat­ive power should strengthen and upscale climate action policy narratives and make them easily implementa­ble.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe