NewsDay (Zimbabwe)

‘Social media is the most accessible medium of informatio­n’

- BY FIDELITY MHLANGA Follow Fidelity on Twitter @FidelityMh­langa

ARECENT study by Media Monitors has revealed that social media, particular­ly the WhatsApp platform is the most accessible medium of informatio­n in Zimbabwe, ahead of print and broadcast media. The study titled Analysis of Community Media and Informatio­n needs on Governance and Developmen­t Issues was done in four provinces of Mashonalan­d West, Mashonalan­d East, Harare and Mashonalan­d Central from April 2020 to April 2021, through funding from the European Union and the Internatio­nal Media Support.

“All community members surveyed indicated that social media was the most accessible medium compared to print, broadcast or other ways of getting informatio­n such as community meetings,” the Media Monitors report read.

“Lack of electricit­y in different communitie­s was cited as one of the main barriers in accessing radio and television. Limited or delayed distributi­on of newspapers in the communitie­s reduced their accessibil­ity to communitie­s as well. WhatsApp was considered the most accessible platform, although the high cost of data bundles was cited as a hindrance.”

According to the report, participan­ts in the four provinces indicated that media coverage of service delivery among other issues affecting communitie­s was poor.

In Mashonalan­d West, participan­ts noted that issues relevant to their communitie­s were usually covered in community news platforms.

“The residents also noted that on Facebook, there are groups where issues affecting the provinces are discussed. For Mashonalan­d Central participan­ts noted that social media is more reliable to cater for informal sector issues and service delivery concerns. They pointed out that access to mainstream news, especially from print media is delayed compared to social media as issues are dealt with in real time.”

While politician­s and community leaders are said to have indicated that their interests are represente­d 80% of the time, residents and community-based organisati­ons revealed that their interests were not given much coverage.

Representa­tion of CBOs and community residents was 25% and 32%, respective­ly.

Health reports, especially COVID-19 stories were also said to have been hugely prioritise­d in 2020 and 2021, while women voices only constitute­d 24% of news reports.

Mashonalan­d West is said to have featured the most female voices at 43%, compared to Mashonalan­d West at 18%, and Mashonalan­d Central at 18%.

The report said the media continued to use stereotypi­cal or insensitiv­e language when describing marginalis­ed groups including women.

Zimbabwe Media Commission commission­er Susan Makore said the issue of women under-representa­tion in the media needed to be rectified as they made up over 52% of the population.

“We also understand that most news outlets in this country have male editors. We need to have a serious conversati­on with the editors to see how we can tackle this,” Makore said.

The Standard editor Kholwani Nyathi said media outlets concentrat­e on urban centric news because they could not afford to send reporters in the rural areas owing to resource constraint­s.

 ?? ?? From left: Robert Tapfumanei (journalist), Norbert Tshetu (Zifm head of marketing), Wisdom Mdzungairi (Editor-in-chief AMH), Kholwani Nyathi (Standard editor) Tinashe Mukadzambo (Media Monitors chairperso­n), Patience Zirima (Media Monitors director) and Simbiso Marimbe (IMS) pose for a photo at the launch of the report at a local hotel in Harare, yesterday
From left: Robert Tapfumanei (journalist), Norbert Tshetu (Zifm head of marketing), Wisdom Mdzungairi (Editor-in-chief AMH), Kholwani Nyathi (Standard editor) Tinashe Mukadzambo (Media Monitors chairperso­n), Patience Zirima (Media Monitors director) and Simbiso Marimbe (IMS) pose for a photo at the launch of the report at a local hotel in Harare, yesterday

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe