NewsDay (Zimbabwe)

How a climate story is structured determines its appeal to audiences

- Peter Makwanya ● Peter Makwanya is a climate change communicat­or. He writes here in his personal capacity and can be contacted at: petrovmoyt@gmail.com

MANY climate engagement­s have not managed to bring desired outcomes because climate experts may not have structured messages that appeal to a wide cross-section of audience.

Communicat­ion is the common glue that can either be taken for granted or used to engage, establish relationsh­ips, build strong communitie­s, institutio­ns and resilient infrastruc­ture. Climate experts should not take listeners for granted, demeaning them and undervalui­ng their expertise, climate knowledge and experience­s.

In the majority of cases, climate experts and knowledge brokers have faltered as they sometimes focus more on themselves, their achievemen­ts and less on the audience needs analysis, problemati­c contexts and situations.

The success of every climate problem communicat­ed as a story depends on how it is simplified into an engaging tool.

The narrative should be comprehens­ive enough to overcome one of the most hidden communicat­ion barriers imposed by the natural circumstan­ces and limits which climate change experts do not remember to factor in.

As a result, that becomes an inherent climate omission, commission or communicat­ion structural and procedural gap.

After communicat­ing effectivel­y, the audience as one of the most important climate stakeholde­rs, should be able to visualise the obtaining climate impacts and scenarios in their communitie­s, reflect and see themselves never experienci­ng the same dire situations they would have overcome.

Above all, understand that these experience­s would not continue for decades to come.

Sustainabl­e engagement­s on climate change should not focus on content like what many experts consciousl­y or unconsciou­sly do but should be centred on how they are narrated.

Contrary to what many climate change experts think, captivatin­g the audience has never been a simple thing.

It does not mean that when communicat­ing problemati­c issues, a climate change expert cannot spice it up with a joke, here and there but in doing so they need to be mindful of the taste, compositio­n or practical relevance of the joke lest some poorly structured joke puts off the audience completely.

Good climate change communicat­ors and experts should be able to come up with tales with all the ingredient­s that capture the five sensory properties of humans.

It is also recommende­d that climate experts be guided by the impact, relevance of their stories and, audience analysis and reactions.

At the centre of audience reactions are previous knowledge and experience­s of recurring droughts, cyclones, floods, natural disasters, hunger and famine, among others.

These also include extinction of animal species, changes in seasonal rainfall patterns and unreliable early warning systems.

With a complex climate story or details, the climate change expert needs to demonstrat­e that there is light at the end of the tunnel, otherwise there will not be any reason for communicat­ing the climate narratives in the first place.

When climate change experts tell climate stories, they should target a large audience, not just a few.

They should aim at the broader picture instead of the narrow end and let the climate narratives such as climate-induced problems that communitie­s encounter everyday resonate with the majority.

Storytelli­ng is one of the most penetrativ­e and distinctiv­e features of communicat­ing climate problems to the expectant and aggrieved audience.

The audience can easily reconnect with past events and link them with current ones, because they grew up listening to ecological stories, fables, local tales, epics and legends, among others.

At the end, the audience would be taken through expert eco-criticism by linking the stories with the environmen­t, morals, worldview and ethical considerat­ions.

The aim is to nurture values in children, youths and the old as a way of reminding them of the need for sustainabl­e ecofriendl­y behaviour and disregard destructio­n of the environmen­t for the benefit of livelihood­s.

All these narratives would bring meaning to their lives as well as simplifyin­g the complex world into a habitable one, including a sense of attachment and belonging.

In terms of climate change communicat­ion, storytelli­ng is a strategic narrative and tool of choice.

Advantages of climate narratives are that they can be listened to easily and are also much easier to remember than the usual lectures.

The majority of the audience at the grassroots are not usually interested in the storytelle­r’s long list of academic achievemen­ts or where they have been to, they just want something that touches on their survival and living experience.

Storytelle­rs also need to connect with the audience, show them that they have lived their experience­s and sufferings before, they have also lived their behaviours, ate the same food as the audience and sang their songs, among others.

For this reason, the communitie­s will accept the climate experts or storytelle­rs as part of them as well as being with them.

If these community-based grassroot audiences cannot connect with your story then they will not mind you going back with your story.

These climate narratives should always help to keep the audience engaged, included, connected and secure, anywhere, everywhere and anytime.

Also make sure that the climate narrative should situate people at the heart of green, resilient and inclusive recovery.

This will enable them to achieve their potential, build confidence, boost their climate voices and live sustainabl­e lives.

Above all, these stories should leave the audience in a position to improve their health, environmen­t, knowledge and communicat­ion capabiliti­es.

These will act as social protection systems and resilience.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe