NewsDay (Zimbabwe)

Fixing the Home Affairs Department is key to fighting xenophobia

- Christine Hobden This story was first published in Mail & Guardian Christine Hobden is a senior lecturer in ethics and public governance at the Wits School of Governance and an Iso Lomso Fellow at the Stellenbos­ch Institute of Advanced Study, South Afric

XENOPHOBIA is back on the table: The Economic Freedom Fighters programme to check the ratio of South African to foreign employees at restaurant­s has prompted heated public discourse. Where exactly is the line drawn between democratic care for South Africans and being xenophobic? And who is driving this line: Disillusio­ned citizens or manoeuvrin­g political parties — or, of course, a combinatio­n of both?

If we are to meaningful­ly tackle xenophobia we need, too, to get the Department of Home Affairs in order, both in its practical running and in line with its legislativ­e and constituti­onal obligation­s.

My analysis of South African citizenshi­p law suggests the department is “shrinking South Africa”, making it increasing­ly difficult to acquire citizenshi­p. This is both through legislativ­e amendments and, most concerning­ly, through overreach on the part of the department.

For example, the department has failed to create regulation­s to allow for the functionin­g of some parts of legislatio­n — such as the Statelessn­ess clause in the South African Citizenshi­p Act, for which there is still no provision in the latest 2020 draft regulation­s — and to create regulation­s that, in effect, increase requiremen­ts (such as the blanket 10-year residency requiremen­t for naturalisa­tion that goes beyond legislativ­e requiremen­ts).

Although civil society frequently and successful­ly challenges the department in court, the department has repeatedly dragged its feet in becoming compliant with court orders.

We also know the waiting times at the department are atrocious, the processes confusing and, often, the experience of those seeking documentat­ion is deeply hostile.

After the 2010 amendment to the Citizenshi­p Act, there are young people who were born in South Africa to permanent residents who are not eligible to apply for citizenshi­p until they are 18, robbing them of the full protection and opportunit­ies of citizenshi­p in the only country in which they have lived.

Nearly 180 000 Zimbabwean­s living and working in South Africa on special exemption visas face constant uncertaint­y regarding the renewal of their permits, currently valid until the end of 2022.

These residents have lived in South Africa for more than 10 years without making an attempt to naturalise and so formalise their commitment to live and work in South Africa — and have their voices heard in the democratic project.

The regulation­s on the Refugee Amendment Act also speak to a suppressio­n of the voice of the most vulnerable residing in South Africa with a clause that permits the revocation of refugee status on the grounds of participat­ing in any political protest or activity.

Foreigners face extreme procedural hostility in South Africa, and it is correct to worry about the way employers can exploit those who find themselves in uncertain and undocument­ed situations — as the EFF claims is their concern.

Such exploitati­on has little to do with ratios of South Africans to foreigners in workplaces and should rightly be dealt with by the enforcemen­t of labour regulation­s. But we need to also notice the role that procedural hostility at the Home Affairs Department plays in creating this vulnerabil­ity in the first place.

The South African Citizenshi­p Act of 1995 was inclusive in spirit following a constituti­on that sought rights for “all people in our country” and an understand­ing of the interconne­ctedness of many who lived in exile or did not have rights to citizenshi­p under the apartheid regime.

Have we paid attention to just how far we have moved away from this commitment to a just and inclusive citizenshi­p?

If we are to truly work to stem the tide of xenophobia in South Africa, we need a department of home affairs that provides transparen­t, efficient, and fair services that, at the very least, align with current citizenshi­p legislatio­n.

Our democracy cannot afford to continue with the current creation of a vulnerable class of residents without the protection­s of stable, transparen­t, and fair routes to permanent residence and citizenshi­p.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe