The Herald (Zimbabwe)

America and the commercial­isation of elections

- Ralph Nader Correspond­ent

OUR political economy — a wonderfull­y embracing phrase much used a century ago — has three main components: The electoral/government­al powers, the marketplac­e, and the civil society, which is composed of we the citizens.

It is well known that when “we the people” get lax about our consumer rights and our voting choices, both the companies and the politician­s turn their backs on us and look out for themselves and their fat-cat donors.

The civil society’s energy or apathy has a profound role in shaping how the other two sectors function, and can either safeguard our democracy or drive it into the ground.

All this is by way of saying that increasing­ly commercial­ising our elections every four years is devastatin­g to the freedom and justice produced by a functionin­g democratic society. Our presidenti­al and congressio­nal elections this year represent a commercial conglomera­te profit centre.

There are the corporate Super PACs and the billionair­e patrons, who manipulate their sponsored candidates, who in turn make explicit or implicit promises to their paymasters to keep the money flowing into their campaigns.

The corporate mass media thrives on the high ratings generated by the mud fights (recall the Republican presidenti­al primary led by Trump).

The media moguls charge high advertisin­g rates and make more profits than ever from elections.

Taken together, commercial­ising elections means that everything is for sale — unless you opt out Bernie Sanders style and refuse corporate PAC contributi­ons and super-rich funding.

When elections are for sale, you know who is most likely to win the auctions. You know how much less your votes and your views count. You know how cleverly sleazy will be the flattery that politician­s send your way so as to obscure who really owns them.

As the election business worsens, the civil community — those neighbourh­ood, local, state and national non-profits that work to reduce many injustices and defend our civil rights and liberties under law — are ignored, sidelined and disrespect­ed.

Whether by the mass media interview shows or on the daily campaign trail, citizen activists and citizen group leaders are rarely asked for their views, for their experience, for their horizons as to what is long overdue and possible.

But the bloviating pundits are regularly featured on the political talk shows; so are the garrulous political consultant­s to the candidates. But the bedrock of our democratic potential — the real experts, the movers and shakers, who start and continue decade after decade the difficult march toward a better society — are treated by the media bookers as off-limits or as interloper­s.

One result of this two-party, for-sale tyranny is that most issues on people’s minds are not debated or discussed inside the electoral arena.

In 2008, I listed over a dozen such proposals — many with majoritari­an support — that both the Republican and the Democratic Parties took off the table (see votenader.org).

Another result of commercial elections is that, by cordoning off its political dances while flattering “the American people,” they lull the electorate into complacenc­y. When enough people get indignant they act and take back control by vigorous engagement in the election process before the choices and pathways are narrowed by the two-party duopoly.

Sure, some people get steamed but it is rarely enough to combat the tendency to revert back to cynicism, withdrawal or proud apathy.

Last month we convened the greatest number of accomplish­ed citizen groups on the largest number of reforms and redirectio­ns ever brought together.

One after another on the stage of historic Constituti­on Hall in Washington, DC they spoke of the entrenched power and greed that they overcame over the past half-century to improve America.

These are the citizen champions who, for example, led the fight for safer and nutritious food, less harmful medicines, cleaner air and water, more secure pensions, a freer media, more open government, waging peace instead of war, securing indigenous peoples’ rights, safer transporta­tion, the well-being of children, insurance industry accountabi­lity and great advances for people with disabiliti­es.

Will you ever see or hear them on national TV or radio broadcast by companies using our public airwaves so profitably for free? Unlikely.

Go to the website breakingth­roughpower.org to see them and dozens of other leaders who too often get shut out by our rulers.

We invited every member of Congress to attend this event by delivered mail and some by repeated phone calls. Not one of these 535 Senators and Representa­tives (nor their staff), who spend so much time raising campaign cash, saw fit to go a couple of miles from Capitol Hill to this unpreceden­ted convocatio­n.

One percent or less of the voters, organised in every Congressio­nal District, can civilise these commercial­ised elections, because that is what the vast majority of the citizenry want.

Do those few people have enough dedicated time for the basic patriotism of making their country more lovable? — Counterpun­ch.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe