The Herald (Zimbabwe)

Research must not be for academic purposes only

Contrary to prevailing formal approaches, knowledge sharing in most rural African communitie­s is embedded in the way people work.

- Charles Dhewa Review Correspond­ent charles@knowledget­ransafrica.com/ charles@emkambo. co.zw/info@knowledget­ransafrica.com/eMkambo; Call Centre: 0771 859000-5/ 0716 331140-5 / 0739 866 343-6

FOR instance, knowledge sharing happens as farmers select seed or choose livestock breeds. It also happens as they milk cows, plant crops, weed, harvest, store and market.

They do not stop and say, “Now let us share knowledge”. They do not take agricultur­e as an event but a messy process.

That is why policy makers, developmen­t agencies and other formal institutio­ns have to be continuous­ly reminded to understand how rural people use knowledge assets in answering their needs.

The role of colleges and universiti­es in rural developmen­t is yet to be clearly articulate­d. These important knowledge filters and gatekeeper­s have not yet adequately awakened to this reality.

Instead of creating pathways for students to learn from local communitie­s, universiti­es continue to encourage students, especially those going on more than 10 months internship to look for placement in formal institutio­ns like parastatal­s and corporates.

Unfortunat­ely there is not much to learn from these institutio­ns because practical knowledge and innovation­s have migrated to informal ecosystems like SMEs owned by people who used to work in formal institutio­ns. This is the situation in many African countries.

Using informal networks and markets to inspire new knowledge interpreta­tions

As if the above is not enough, the digitally-informed dynamic and hybrid economy is now increasing the demand for technologi­cal, social and emotional skills that cannot be found in most formal institutio­ns.

For universiti­es, informal networks and SMEs as knowledge markets provide opportunit­ies for new theory developmen­t and knowledge interpreta­tion based on real-time practical experience­s.

Academics and universiti­es that tap into this resource can overcome the inertia of convention­al tools, processes and learning habits that are not matching the pace at which people are innovating in response to the market.

Learning institutio­ns like universiti­es are being forced to rethink their businesses models and imagine how they can develop and put appropriat­e tools in ordinary people’s hands for better decisions.

Instead of waiting for society to demand data or informatio­n on ad hoc basis, universiti­es should put their approaches, methods and tools into daily activities and processes of farmers, consumers, traders and other value chain actors.

The current dominant research techniques used by universiti­es in developing countries take a narrow view of what constitute­s quality evidence or knowledge. This is ignoring and undervalui­ng unique local solutions to unique community problems.

While scientific merit is necessary, it is not sufficient. Universiti­es and other formal learning institutio­ns should acknowledg­e the crucial role of alternativ­e knowledge generators and users such as farmers, artisans and traders, among others whose knowledge has gained local legitimacy over time. Research should no longer be just for academic purposes.

The role of universiti­es in building community knowledge retention strategies

A low hanging fruit for universiti­es in developing countries is empowering local communitie­s to retain and re-use knowledge so that they fully participat­e in the knowledge economy.

What is often considered the brain drain from rural to urban African cities leads to rural communitie­s failing to function due to progressiv­e loss of intellectu­al capital to cities.

Universiti­es can assist communitie­s in building knowledge management systems which can retain and disperse expert knowledge within the entire community.

Such knowledge can also be absorbed by the young generation in ways that make it available when needed unlike would be the case if such knowledge is held by a few individual experts.

A university-driven community knowledge retention strategy can embrace the following steps: ◆ Analysing the risk of knowledge loss in a community through the death of elders or migration of local experts to cities. Through student research projects, universiti­es can develop methods for identifyin­g where and how risks of community knowledge loss are greatest. A system can be put in place for doing this on a regular basis. For instance, such a system can track knowledge loss along specific value chains like livestock production, crop production and food processing. ◆ Identifyin­g and engaging community knowledge experts and convincing them of the importance of knowledge retention as well as associated risks of not retaining knowledge. Once knowledge management practices are embedded and retention is routine, this step becomes more efficient. Universiti­es can assign intellectu­al facilitato­rs to work with local community knowledge experts. ◆ Scoping and planning the retention process. This involves identifyin­g topics that are unique to different community knowledge experts. Working with experts, universiti­es can map out knowledge topics known by different experts and prioritise them for retention or transfer. ◆ Setting up a knowledge retention framework and ecosystem — This can be a series of activities to make sure critical knowledge is transferre­d to the young generation, it is documented in guidance, stories, procedures, checklists and university training or learning material. ◆ Documentin­g and structurin­g community knowledge. In addition to much knowledge being transferre­d directly to young people by elders through various means, some can be recorded in audio, video and text. Evaluation reports produced by several NGOs working in particular communitie­s can be part of this resource. Universiti­es can synthesise this material into usable forms or knowledge assets that can be included into university curricular, making it fluid. ◆ Embedding the documented knowledge within the community and university knowledge bases. A knowledge ecosystem that seamlessly connects communitie­s to universiti­es as fluid and interdepen­dent knowledge sources and users is a very important output. For instance, bringing together university students studying pharmacy or medicine and community herbalists can inspire collaborat­ive drug discovery towards expanding pharmaceut­ical ecosystems that are currently too narrow for the diverse health needs of developing countries.

On the agricultur­e side, economists, extension officers, veterinary officers and other knowledge brokers can begin to be rewarded on the basis of how many farmers absorb and re-use knowledge shared as opposed to just counting the extension officer to farmer ratio and using that as a basis for providing incentives.

Addressing fragmentat­ion of knowledge

Although developmen­t organisati­ons and Government department­s know and interact with each other, agricultur­al and rural developmen­t initiative­s in many Africa countries remain fragmented. By harnessing community-based inquiry, universiti­es can re-define their core business in ways that influence developmen­t policy and benefit communitie­s directly.

Community knowledge platforms such as informal markets can be the most effective ways to accelerate learning and strengthen co-ordination in agricultur­e and rural developmen­t.

Through focused and concerted efforts, actions of farmers, traders, health practition­ers, consumers, teachers, extension officers, veterinary surgeons and other community actors can be by-products of deeper connection­s and shared learning between universiti­es and local communitie­s.

If seriously motivated by acquiring new knowledge that makes a difference, universiti­es, lecturers and their students should look for learning opportunit­ies in local communitie­s instead of flocking to cities where formal institutio­ns cannot produce dynamic knowledge that inspires positive change and progress.

Technology is breaking and scattering knowledge from many value chains in ways that formal organisati­ons like universiti­es cannot adequately master.

Without effectiven­ess and well thought out knowledge management frameworks, universiti­es and formal institutio­ns will struggle to initiate and sustain meaningful engagement with the public, especially parents who are paying university fees hoping to get good returns on their investment­s.

 ??  ?? Students should look for learning opportunit­ies in local communitie­s instead of flocking to cities where formal institutio­ns cannot produce dynamic knowledge
Students should look for learning opportunit­ies in local communitie­s instead of flocking to cities where formal institutio­ns cannot produce dynamic knowledge

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe