The Sunday Mail (Zimbabwe)

Local doctors not keen on pathology

-

which is inadequate to meet the current trends in the investigat­ions of violent or unnatural deaths.

Other pieces of legislatur­e include Anatomic Donations and Post-mortem Examinatio­ns Act, Burials and Cremations Act, Exhumation­s Act and the Births and Deaths Registrati­on Act.

The Coroner’s Office draft bill seeks to consolidat­e all these activities that are thrown in the various pieces of legislatio­n into one piece of legislatio­n.

The Director of Pathology Services in the Ministry of Health and Child Care, Dr Maxwell Mareza Hove, is the country’s only forensic pathologis­t.

He explained why doctors are not keen on taking up forensic pathology as a career in Zimbabwe: “The challenges that we have been facing because of the lack of this legal framework is that we don’t have a functional forensic services in the country.

“Actually, we don’t have forensic experts, for example forensic pathologis­ts,” said Dr Hove.

The country has been outsourcin­g expatriate­s from other countries like India, Cuba and Tanzania.

He said despite the fact that the country has brilliant doctors, they have not chosen forensic pathology as a career because of the legal framework/system which is adversaria­l in nature as opposed to it being inquisitor­ial, meaning that when forensic pathologis­ts go to court they will be going for a fight or a war.

Explained Dr Hove: “Doctors are not trained to fight and they don’t have the nature to fight, their job requires them to be tender. Then suddenly in a forensic investigat­ion they are called to fight and somebody is waiting to smash/fight them in court.”

For example, when somebody is murdered or is alleged to have been murdered, a forensic pathologis­t has to come up with evidence which will be taken to court as evidence. The forensic pathologis­ts are then summoned to court where they face the accused.

It is on the basis of this pathologis­t’s evidence that the accused might be sentenced to death or not and the accused will have to fight back for his/her innocence. The defence lawyer might attack the pathologis­t for his competency, integ- rity and profession­alism. And since court procedures are public, doctors are not willing to sacrifice their hard-earned careers in court.

The coroner comes in between the experts and the courts — he/she will then present the evidence in court and at the same time defend it.

Zimbabwe does not have a coroner, it relies on magistrate­s who are appointed and are never part of the investigat­ion process. They rely on the Inquest Act, which, according to experts, is inadequate and outdated.

For instance, the Inquest Act only comes after all the investigat­ions to try and put all the findings after. An autopsy (post-mortem) report is actually an affidavit under the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act.

The actual performanc­e of the autopsy examinatio­ns is governed by another piece of legislatio­n called Anatomic Donations and Post-mortem Examinatio­ns Act. The Coroners’ Office will put all these pieces of law concerning forensic pathology under one roof and legislatio­n.

Chief Law Officer in the Ministry of Justice, Legal and Parliament­ary Affairs, Mr Charles Paul Manhiri, said it was important to have an independen­t and impartial forensic investigat­ion board.

“We are looking at Section 69 of the Constituti­on which provides for a fair trial of any accused person. By fair trial, it, therefore, means the nature of evidence given should be sufficient,” said Mr Manhiri.

 ??  ?? Forensic pathologis­t works to bring out evidence
Forensic pathologis­t works to bring out evidence

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe