The Sunday Mail (Zimbabwe)

Why data is key for Africa’s response to pandemics

Prediction­s of the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic by some public health scientists painted a gloomy picture for Africa.

- Professor Francisca Mutapi Prof Mutapi, who was born in Zimbabwe, is a Professor in global health infection and immunity and co-director of the Global Health Academy at the University of Edinburg. This article was first published on The Conversati­on.

THE continent was expected to suffer a huge burden of disease and death. These prediction­s have not held true. The continent has experience­d fewer deaths fewer deaths than predicted.

In addition, it has been much less affected than many other parts of the world.

For example, the total number of recorded deaths in the entire African continent is slightly less than those recorded in the UK alone. Even when under-reporting is accounted for, the mortality rate has been lower than in Western Europe.

There are several reasons why prediction­s of Covid-19 ravaging African countries were wrong — but two stand out. The first is limited scientific knowledge of how the virus behaves in different population­s and environmen­ts. The second is an underestim­ation of Africa’s ability to respond to the pandemic.

Despite having comparativ­ely poor health infrastruc­ture, African public health practition­ers have amassed a wealth of experience of managing epidemics. The 2014-2016 Ebola outbreak in West Africa showed local doctors using mitigation strategies available to them and the strong community based healthcare system. By September 2020, it was clear that the pandemic was following a different path on the continent than was predicted. This underscore­d the need for African countries to learn lessons for Africa from data collected from Africa.

To do this, my colleagues and I at the National Institute for Health Research Global Health Unit Tackling Infections to Benefit Africa worked with partners at the Universiti­es of Ghana and Edinburgh, as well as the World Health Organisati­on (WHO) regional office for Africa, to analyse data collected from member states.

We determined the factors that influenced the timing of the first Covid-19 cases as well as the number of Covid-19 deaths in the WHO’s African member states during the first and second pandemic waves. We also looked for associatio­ns between the preparedne­ss of health systems and government pandemic responses. We found that countries with more urban population­s detected their first cases of Covid-19 earlier than those with higher rural population­s. Countries with high HIV prevalence reported the most Covid-19-related deaths. And countries with the most advanced health systems fared the worst in terms of Covid-19 cases and deaths.

Our findings helped us to understand Africa’s epidemic and provided lessons for future pandemics.

A snapshot of Covid-19 in Africa

In our recent research we investigat­ed factors that could potentiall­y influence the spread and severity of the Covid-19 pandemic based on the knowledge of the virus’ transmissi­on factors and potential risk factors. We tested the effect of 15 such factors.

We found that the first case was detected earlier in countries with more urban population­s, higher internatio­nal connectivi­ty and greater Covid-19 test capacity, but later in island nations. This finding is not surprising, given what we know about the transmissi­on of the virus indoors, the introducti­on of SARS-CoV-2 into Africa from Europe and the importance of surveillan­ce and testing.

Egypt was the first of 47 African countries to report a case in February 2020. Most countries had recorded cases by late March 2020, with Lesotho being the last to report one, on May 14, 2020.

Countries with high rates of HIV were also more likely to have higher mortality rates. This

was also not surprising as people with HIV often have other health conditions that put them at greater risk from Covid-19.

Among 44 countries of the WHO African Region with available, South Africa had the highest mortality rate during the first wave between May and August 2020, at 33,3 deaths recorded per 100 000 people. Cape Verde and Eswatini had the next highest rates at 17,5 and 8,6 deaths per 100 000 respective­ly. At 0,26 deaths recorded per 100 000, the lowest mortality rate was in Uganda.

True numbers of deaths in Africa are thought to be over three times higher than officially reported, slightly higher than the global average, but even accounting for this, our findings are still valid.

Our most important finding was that seemingly well-prepared, resilient countries such as South Africa have fared worst during the pandemic. This is not only true in Africa; the result is consistent with a global trend that more developed countries have often been particular­ly hard-hit by Covid-19. This tells

us that lack of preparedne­ss and vulnerabil­ity are not the same thing.

While health systems may have been less prepared for the pandemic, other factors such as demography and rural population­s made the African population less vulnerable. We are also currently investigat­ing the potential protective role of previous exposure to other pathogens that may induce Covid-19 protective cross-immunity or modify the immune phenotype and thus, disease progressio­n and prognosis.

Our analysis indicates the critical importance of using context-appropriat­e data in models to make prediction­s that guide control or mitigation policy. This would inform context-relevant interventi­ons. The director of the WHO’s regional office for Africa, Matshidiso Moeti, remarked:

“The early models which predicted how Covid-19 would lead to a massive number of cases in Africa were largely the work of institutio­ns not from our continent. This collaborat­ion between researcher­s in Africa and

Europe underlines the importance of anchoring ◆ analysis on Africa’s epidemics firmly here.”

The study also highlighte­d unanticipa­ted vulnerabil­ities. For example countries with strong health systems could still be vulnerable to pandemics. Therefore, assessing the impact of potential threats and future pandemic preparedne­ss planning must be informed by the transmissi­on dynamics and local risk factors for infection and disease.

It is clear that other factors unique to Africa such as a younger population and less urbanisati­on have contribute­d to the comparativ­ely lower Covid-19 cases and deaths on the continent. Moeti reiterated these when she said:

We can no longer focus our understand­ing of disease transmissi­on purely on the characteri­stics of a virus — Covid-19 operates within a social context which has a major impact on its spread.

Going forward

Going forward, African researcher­s and government­s need to do three things.

First, African scientists must conduct more Africa-led analyses of Africa’s Covid-19 epidemic at national and continenta­l level. These analyses should include studies of the impact of Africa’s socio-ecological setting and the structure of the health delivery system, which is heavily community based. ◆ Second, we need to use these results to identify uniquely African strengths and vulnerabil­ities to emerging and epidemic disease to inform preparedne­ss planning and ensure that epidemic preparedne­ss indices such as the Global Health Security Index take these into account.

◆ Third, we need to accelerate open data sharing to ensure timely access to data to inform data-driven innovation­s and interventi­ons.

 ?? ?? Limited testing and challenges in the attributio­n of the cause of death means that the number of confirmed deaths may not be an accurate count of the true number of deaths from Covid-19. — allAfrica.com
Limited testing and challenges in the attributio­n of the cause of death means that the number of confirmed deaths may not be an accurate count of the true number of deaths from Covid-19. — allAfrica.com
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe