The Zimbabwe Independent

Will China help or hurt the AfCFTA?

-

AFRICAN countries want to trade more with their partners on the continent — through the African Continenta­l Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) agreement that launched operations on January 1 — but will that hurt big trading partners like China?

In its public statements, Beijing is wholly supportive of the AfCFTA, seeing it as a “win-win” solution and arguing that free trade and multilater­alism are key foundation­s to the global system.

In November 2020, China’s Foreign Affairs minister Wang Yi said the government “will provide cash assistance and capacitybu­ilding training to its secretaria­t”.

e focus on intra-African links is likely to involve China in two main ways: trade and the building of infrastruc­ture to facilitate trade.

Building infrastruc­ture

Infrastruc­ture is necessary to make the reduction of tariff and non-tariff barriers. AfCFTA secretary-general Wamkele Mene told the Financial Times: “If you don’t have the roads, if you don’t have the right equipment for customs authoritie­s at the border to facilitate the fast and efficient transit of goods ... if you don’t have the infrastruc­ture, both hard and soft, it reduces the meaningful­ness of this agreement.”

China is the top investor in African infrastruc­ture, and so Beijing is likely to play a key role in projects to set up transport corridors that would support African industrial­isation and the processing of its raw materials. For example, China financed the constructi­on of Kenya’s standard gauge railway (SGR) and the Addis Ababa-Djibouti railroad.

e Chinese government wants to boost its links to East and North Africa through its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which aims to create a new “Silk Road” and ties more countries into its economic orbit. Kenya’s SGR is part of the BRI, but Kenyan exporters and companies from across the world can use the infrastruc­ture to transport their goods — it is not a purely China-focused project.

Bottom of form

While more developing world partners like Turkey and India are increasing their interest and activities in Africa, they have not come close to rivalling China in the provision of finance for infrastruc­ture.

But Beijing itself may be more reluctant to lend because of borrowing countries’ high debt loads. Nonetheles­s, China is set to be a major beneficiar­y of the drive to build new African trade corridors and the infrastruc­ture to link African raw materials to processing centres and markets.

Potential for trade tensions

e AfCFTA is designed to boost trade amongst African partners. But that very reason alone could cause the most friction with China, which is the continent’s single-largest trading partner.

Some commentato­rs argue that China’s role as “the world’s factory” has stunted the developmen­t of African manufactur­ing and supply chains. Kenya’s cement exports to East Africa neighbours have been low due to an influx of cheap Chinese cement.

Over the past 10 years, Tanzania and Uganda increased their imports from China by 60% while sourcing just 4%-6% of industrial products from Kenya.

Chinese products are often cheaper than their African counterpar­ts, and some business leaders are worried about the impact of the AfCFTA on businesses and their costs.

“ e Buy-Africa-only mindset of AfCFTA doesn’t work. As cross-border traders, we know China moves our goods in a cheaper way than anyone else,” says Dennis Juru, president of the Internatio­nal Cross Border Traders Associatio­n, based in South Africa.

e free-trade deal does not include a common external tariff, leaving it up to each country to decide what duties it will impose on Chinese goods.

Some African countries use industrial policy — which can include tariffs and other measures — in order to support their local industries so that companies can build up the strength to compete on regional and global markets. But there are not many countries on the continent using such tools at the moment.

Rules of origin

e AfCFTA’s rules of origin will help to shape the developmen­t of manufactur­ing on the continent. e free-trade provisions are for African goods, and policy-makers need to decide what “Made in Africa” means.

Rules of origin can be based on the percentage of value-added or require that certain manufactur­ing processes be carried out within the country or zone of origin.

ose rules have not been agreed on, and they are key to responding to concerns that foreign investors could set up shop, make a minimal commitment to the economy and then benefit from the AfCFTA to export duty-free to other African countries.

e AfCFTA secretaria­t says that it expects the final discussion­s on the rules of origin to be completed around the middle of this year.

Once the rules are discussed, foreign investors — Chinese ones included — will be required to ensure that they meet the requiremen­ts so they can use their operations as regional and continenta­l platforms.

For example, Volkswagen could seek to use its planned operations in Ghana to export to the Economic Community of West African (Ecowas) states; and when the AfCFTA is fully operationa­l, the auto manufactur­er could in theory sell its cars tarifffree all over the continent.

Still in the starting blocks

AfCFTA is still an aspiration­al agreement. For now, China will not lose much of its market for manufactur­ed goods in Africa. “It will take at least 10 years before it even begins to look like being the primary means of African trade. At its outset, the AfCFTA will not cause China, or anyone else, too many problems,” says Stephen Chan, a professor of world politics at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London.

“Kenyan cement will hardly be enough to satisfy the demands of a continent. Nor even would Dangote Cement from Nigeria and its subsidiari­es on the continent. For now, the Chinese can undercut many local producers,” adds Chan.

Getting the continent to agree on what to do to protect and support its cement producers or textile producers — if that is something policy-makers want to do — will take a lot more diplomacy and negotiatio­n than it does now when only single countries seek to implement such policies.

So while the AfCFTA is an important step forward towards continenta­l economic integratio­n, there are still many obstacles to overcome — and ones that put China’s and Africa’s interests in competitio­n. — eAfricaRep­ort.

 ??  ?? Top investor ... China financed the constructi­on of the Addis Ababa-Djibouti railroad.
Top investor ... China financed the constructi­on of the Addis Ababa-Djibouti railroad.
 ??  ?? AfCFTA secretary-general Wamkele Mene
AfCFTA secretary-general Wamkele Mene

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe