The Zimbabwe Independent

Policy inconsiste­ncy riles mining sector

-

PLAYERS in the mining sector say government’s policy inconsiste­ncy, highlighte­d by its shock decision to revert to charging mining fees in the local currency following an earlier announceme­nt indicating it was moving to peg license fees in United States dollars, is a recipe for disaster as it causes uncertaint­ies that scare off investors.

The policy somersault came barely a week after the government passed legislatio­n, in the form of a statutory instrument, which regularise­d the levying of mining fees in the stable US dollar.

Under the US dollar denominate­d charges, Mines minister Winston Chitando had hiked fees by close to 800%, triggering a fierce backlash from small scale miners who cited the policy stance as prohibitiv­e and a threat to their operations.

Chitando’s US dollar-denominate­d fees effectivel­y hiked charges by about 800%, quickly courting a massive backlash from small-scale miners who described the move as prohibitiv­e and a threat to their operations. Chitando’s latest policy shift, all within a year, saw the sector oscillatin­g from levying charges in foreign currency to reintroduc­ing the local unit.

There have also been policy inconsiste­ncies around the controvers­ial indigenisa­tion legislatio­n.

The indigenisa­tion policy, which also became the centerpiec­e of former President Robert Mugabe’s populist but ruinous policies compelled foreign investors to cede 51% equity in their businesses to the locals.

During the 2013 polls, Mugabe feverishly marketed the Indigenisa­tion policy, resulting in massive capital flight as foreign investors sought safe investment destinatio­ns.

But with President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s administra­tion, riding on the mantra: “Zimbabwe is open for business”, scrapped the Indigenisa­tion laws

Players in the mining sector this week said the lack of policy consistenc­y, especially given the history of the fast-track land reform programme and indigenisa­tion, undermines investor confidence and soils the country’s investment image.

“Policy objectives are key in planning, in instilling investor confidence particular­ly in the commerce sector where forecast is key in order to protect and project the performanc­e of a business. Now the government says one thing today, and another next year, and is notorious for vacillatin­g, no one will be guaranteed of his or her future,” Harare-based corporate lawyer Webster Jiti told the Zimbabwe Independen­t this week.

“We once had the Indigenous Policy and needless to state that it was influenced by political considerat­ions and that is not bad at all, what is bad is the unexpected plug that was pulled on it. There is nothing wrong with empowering previously disadvanta­ged locals, but everything wrong with waking up and stubbing it.”

He said while adjustment­s are budgeted for by investors, total or complete shifts make a country unfriendly to investors.

“As Zimbabwe, we have a history of inconsiste­ncies in policies. Imagine they say we have dollarised and tomorrow you are back to the Zimbabwean dollar,” Jiti said.

Economist Chenayimoy­o Mutambaser­e said the introducti­on of US dollar fees was an attempt by the government to generate revenue though the move could have an adverse impact on the operations of smallscale miners.

“Artisanal miners are already in trouble due to the direct disbenefit outcome of frontloadi­ng the sector with prohibitiv­e costs is the rise of mining lords who then hire artisanal miners who engage in bidding wars which result in the Mashurugwi gangs,” she said.

Instead, Mutambaser­e said, it was imperative for the government to form partnershi­ps with small-scale and artisanal miners as opposed to pushing them further undergroun­d by loading high upfront costs which in turn force players, particular­ly the small-scale miners, to start bypassing.

“Mining fees require a horses-for-courses approach. On Indigenisa­tion it’s great to encourage more local participat­ion into the sector. However, this must be cognisant of why we have foreign participat­ion; often it’s because these investors have the capital to inject into the overhead burdened industry.

“A genuine attempt at Indigenisa­tion must be supported by a strategy to capacitate the locals. This sudden U-turn will be seen by foreign investors as infringeme­nt on property rights and may in future destabilis­e the sector at a time when the economy needs more hands-on deck,” she said.

Under Mnangagwa’s economic recovery and growth plans, his administra­tion is targeting to transform the mining sector into a US$12 billion industry by 2023. — Staff Writer.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe