The Zimbabwe Independent

Blockchain, its impact on the audit profession

- Nigel Chimhofu AUDIT ASSISTANT

Blockchain has been referred to as the next internet or rather the internet of value. It is defined as a distribute­d ledger that provides a unique function to perform peer-to-peer transactio­ns without any intermedia­ry. Convention­ally, organisati­ons documented transactio­ns manually in their ledgers. These ledgers would be kept separately to protect integrity and accuracy and each company would have its own ledger.

At its core, blockchain is a ledger but with a difference. It has what we call “the built-in trust”. Parties must agree to definite rules, rules to which transactio­ns will be authentica­ted and vetted within the blockchain ledger. If a transactio­n is to occur, it is vetted and validated according to the agreed protocols and then accepted and posted in the system. Once posted, the transactio­n cannot be reversed.

Blockchain has these unique characteri­stics:

Distribute­d ledger — it has a public ledger that contains history of all transactio­ns that have ever occurred. In addition to being efficient, the blockchain has other unique characteri­stics that make it a breakthrou­gh innovation. It is considered reliable because full copies of the blockchain ledger are upheld by all active nodes. Thus, if one node goes offline, the ledger is still readily available to all other participan­ts in the network. A blockchain lacks a single point of failure. (Block Chain Technology, CPA, 2017)

Near real time settlement — it allows settling of transactio­ns in real time and this prevents the risk of the other party fudging the transactio­ns.

Peer to peer — individual­s can transact directly without involving any third parties. This helps in improving the time in which transactio­ns are cleared and has an impact of reducing transactio­n costs that are charged by the third parties.

Irreversib­ility — it contains the recording of every transactio­n and these transactio­ns are immutable i.e. one cannot edit, delete or reverse. No single party has the right to modify the contents of the transactio­ns. This makes it a more effective way of record keeping, reducing the risk of fraud or manipulati­on of data.

Smart contracts — Blockchain­s contain smart contracts, an agreement made amongst participan­ts in advance and stored in the blockchain which executes contracts based on specified instructio­ns agreed by the parties. For instance, a smart lease contract would enable the automatic payment of rentals. It could be modified further to automatica­lly transfer the assets in the event of a default. Since the contracts are immutable this gives confidence to the various actors in the network that everyone is playing by the rules.

Why focus on audit?

The introducti­on of blockchain has caused a lot of world-shattering impacts on almost every industry, to the extent that some have suggested that the technology will completely replace the audit profession. To suggest that blockchain will replace the need of an auditor is a statement that is flawed and a reflection that the proponents of this theory do not appreciate the role and the purpose of the auditor.

This is because the transactio­n recorded in the blockchain may still be unauthoris­ed, fraudulent or illegal, it may be executed between related parties or incorrectl­y classified in the financial statements. Hence, the auditor will still be needed to provide assurance on these. The technology will unquestion­ably have some impacts on the way the auditor delivers and conducts his duties. It will come with challenges, but however, where there are challenges, opportunit­ies are not far behind. The technology will have an impact on the audit profession mainly because of the following:

• Business model — The blockchain technology will metamorpho­sise the traditiona­l business model that we are used to. This then means that the auditor needs to have a new and revised understand­ing of the business models. New business models come with both new audit and business risk.

• Internal controls — the new business model will come with new controls which will be principall­y automated over the financial reporting process of the organisati­on. This will demand a new set of procedures and skills to appropriat­ely test the new controls

• The technology will present new ways of transactin­g, recording, keeping, and reporting the financial informatio­n. The current audit procedures may not be adequate to address the risks that come with the blockchain technology.

Impact of blockchain

Subsequent­ly, most of the ways businesses operate will be automated. The auditor would need new skills. The BCT comes with new business models and this presents new audit risk. The auditor would need to have a new understand­ing of the business model. Failure to do that would make the auditor’s role redundant. You can only provide appropriat­e assurance to a business model that you comprehend. Moreover, since most controls would now be automated, the auditor would need to have a comprehens­ive appreciati­on of the general informatio­n technology controls (GITCs). This then suggests that the audit firms need to invest in data analytics as BCT will remove the audit paper trail that we are used to.

The cumulative impact of blockchain on industries and on internal controls over financial reporting also means that audit methodolog­ies will need to evolve, since the technology will introduce new risks related to the reliabilit­y of the blockchain, automated controls, and related-party transactio­ns. The current audit of financial statements needs to comply with Internatio­nal Standards of Audit (ISAs). It will be very problemati­c to change the audit procedures and approach without first changing the nature of Internatio­nal Auditing Standard, the current ISAs need to change to address this, as the procedures are mainly manual substantiv­e procedures, they need to be revised in order to address the new risks.

Some would then suggest that the auditors do not need new skills because they can always place reliance on the work of IT auditors, however, in this case it would be different because the greater part of the transactio­ns would be automated. This then suggests that the skill set possessed by the IT auditors would require major changes for the auditors to fully place reliance on the work performed by the IT audit specialist­s who will be engaged with the audit team.

Compositio­n of audit team

One of the key attributes of BCT is that the transactio­ns that are processed through BCT are irreversib­le and immutable, a function that you can place reliance on. This then suggests that the vouching of invoices is one of the functions that would become redundant, as the transactio­ns can all be tested using GIC S. Such improvemen­t will affect the compositio­n of the audit team as the junior staff that mainly perform the vouching of invoices would become redundant. The skills that would be in demand would be more of analytical skills and profession­al scepticism, the skills that are mainly possessed by the senior staff. This then proposes that the training offices will require more analysts and more auditors with IT expertise. Embracing new technology will require mainly less manpower, and this would affect junior staff.

Continuous monitoring system

The blockchain would give the auditor the opportunit­y to have real time access to the client’s system. This may allow an auditor to obtain informatio­n required for the auditing in a consistent and timely manner. For instance, if a transactio­n occurs in blockchain, it would be possible for an auditor to develop a system that continuous­ly audits the transactio­ns as they happen. This could eliminate manual extraction of data and audit preparatio­n activities that are time consuming.

Hurtling up audit preparatio­n activities could have the benefits of lessening the delay amid the transactio­n and verificati­on dates — one of the major disparagem­ents of financial reporting. Reducing lag time could offer the chance to increase the effectiven­ess and usefulness of financial reporting and auditing by empowering management and auditors to focus on riskier and more complex transactio­ns while conducting routine auditing in near real time (Blockchain technology, CPA 2017).

However, this could present an independen­t challenge, as the auditor could end up placing reliance on client systems, thus reducing the independen­ce of the auditor, which could even affect the way both stakeholde­rs and shareholde­rs will accept assurance offered by auditors.

Absolute assurance

An auditor customaril­y provides reasonable assurance when it comes to auditing of financial statements. This is mainly because trying to provide absolute assurance would be near to impossible as it involves voluminous transactio­ns. This would be costly and would entail a high amount of time. Since most transactio­ns will be automated, rather than manually examining a sample of transactio­ns, auditors can take advantage of AI methodolog­ies to scrutinise whole population­s of transactio­ns in a much quicker time. As a substitute for spending their time on manual labour, auditors will be able to put their profession­al skills to better use on high-value tasks by focusing their efforts on the elucidatio­n of the results.

However, it is undesirabl­e for auditors to offer more assurance other than reasonable assurance as this increases the risk on the auditors. It is also important to consider other issues that may affect the auditors’ ability to provide a higher assurance. Such issues will include increased risks over data integrity which increases with the increased use of automated transactio­ns.

Conclusion

Blockchain has not yet been ingrained in the minds of the organisati­onal leaders and its triumph will only be realised if the leaders move from blockchain tourism and get to put the technology into use.

The blockchain technology is no longer an experiment, it is now a true agent of change. This completely applies to the auditors, they need to be ready and well-versed in order to embrace the opportunit­ies that comes with blockchain technology, it’s no longer a matter of asking if blockchain will disrupt the audit profession, it’s now a matter of when and will the auditor be ready when that profusely manifest.

Chimhofu is an audit senior assistant at Deloitte and Touché, Harare. — nigelchimh­ofu@gmail. com or www.nigelalber­t.co.zw

 ?? ?? The current audit of financial statements needs to comply with Internatio­nal Standards of Audit
The current audit of financial statements needs to comply with Internatio­nal Standards of Audit
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe