The Zimbabwe Independent

Crowdfundi­ng as alternativ­e finance for entreprene­urs

- Alexander Maune consultant Maune is a Talmudic scholar, researcher, and consultant as well as a member of IoDZ. — alexanderm­aune6@gmail.com.

This paper, a follow up to the previous paper that introduced alternativ­e finances, looks at crowdfundi­ng in the context of online alternativ­e finance for entreprene­urs. This paper is based on a number of articles published in scientific journals some of which are cited here. Broadly defined, alternativ­e finance refers to non-bank financial channels, which have proliferat­ed in the last decade as part of technologi­cal advances in finance often referred to as financial technology firms or — ‘FinTech’. The advancemen­t in technology is helping to address the imbalances between demand and supply for alternativ­e finance.

What is crowdfundi­ng?

Crowdfundi­ng stands at the forefront of, and is synonymous with, alternativ­e finance. A number of authors have viewed crowdfundi­ng as a method of pooling small financial contributi­ons from a potentiall­y large group of backers, while using the internet, and often without the involvemen­t of standard financial intermedia­ries. In this respect, an old fundraisin­g method (synonymous to ‘mukando’ in Zimbabwe) receives a new boost from internet technologi­es towards achieving greater fundraisin­g scale, speed and scope. Related technologi­es are integrated by service providers known as crowdfundi­ng platforms, which are defined as internet applicatio­ns linking fundraiser­s and their potential backers while facilitati­ng the exchanges between them in accordance with prespecifi­ed conditions. Moreover, the campaign itself is also an important element of crowdfundi­ng, and while platforms serve more as campaign management systems, their role is mostly supported by promotiona­l capacities in the forms of social media sharing and engagement­s for attracting prospectiv­e backers.

Menon et al. (2018) in a published article entitled, “Analysing the Role of Crowdfundi­ng in Entreprene­urial Ecosystems: A Social Media Event Study of Two Competing Product Launches,” argue that there are six core elements to crowdfundi­ng and these are:

Crowd — refers to large group or conglomera­tion of individual­s contributi­ng via the internet, by financiall­y supporting a project or cause.

Project owners — are project creators or entreprene­urs seeking capital.

Intermedia­ries — are crowdfundi­ng platforms, that is, a virtual hub for the crowd and project owners.

Funding mechanism — are the principles or rules the intermedia­ries set under which funding takes place.

Specialisa­tion — refers to type of projects the intermedia­ries support. Kickstarte­r and Indiegogo support projects, while equity CFP supports startups or business, for example, innovestme­nt or invesdor.

Return type — is the return of investment or incentives for the crowd, for example, goodwill or thank you for donations.

Shneor Rotem (2020) in a book chapter entitled “Crowdfundi­ng models, strategies, and choices between them,” argues that crowdfundi­ng is an umbrella term for a wider family of fundraisin­g models. At a basic level, these models can be differenti­ated between “investment models” or “non-investment models” depending on the types of compensati­on promised to, and expected by, the funders. Specifical­ly, investment models refer to lending and equity crowdfundi­ng offering financial returns to investors, while non-investment models include reward and donation crowdfundi­ng offering non-financial returns to consumers and donors, respective­ly.

Accordingl­y, Shneor Rotem and Munim Ziaul Haque (2019) in an article entitled, “Reward crowdfundi­ng contributi­on as planned behaviour: An extended framework,” published in the Journal of Business Research, found that reward crowdfundi­ng has been a popular channel for entreprene­urs to raise funding for their ventures as of 2016, with an estimated value of EUR 191 million in Europe, US$598 m in the Americans and USD 2,08 billion in Asia-Pacific while in Africa microfinan­ce was the leading model of alternativ­e finance accounting for 42% (US$34,7m) of total market volume, donation-based crowdfundi­ng accounting for 17% (US$14m) and reward-based crowdfundi­ng accounting for 10% (US$3,17 m).

Background history

Crowdfundi­ng is a new developmen­t in academic entreprene­urial finance research and has been the latest source of finance to enter the field. Its progress can be traced to numerous sources, such as technologi­cal progress brought by the internet, the associated social media channels, and the ongoing regulatory changes in financiall­y savvy countries. These tools and circumstan­ces have enabled crowdfundi­ng to enter the alternativ­e finance market as the youngest mechanism, with the term being coined in 2006 and research gaining traction at the beginning of the present decade.

Crowdfundi­ng is arguably the most visible disruptive technology intermedia­tion. In less than a decade, crowdfundi­ng has gained traction in a number of developed economies that includes; Australia, United Kingdom, Netherland­s, Italy, and United States of America. This exciting phenomenon is spreading across the developed world and is now attracting considerab­le interest in the developing world as well (InfoDev, 2013). Crowdfundi­ng is an emerging channel for entreprene­urial and project funding, which has seen exponentia­l growth in recent years, reaching a volume of EUR 262 billion in 2016, a 208% increase from EUR 130 billion in 2015 (Shneor and Munim, 2019).

Crowdfundi­ng has been especially useful for financing unique projects, such as, creative or artistic, that generally finds it hard to get support from more traditiona­l sources of finance. Eranti V. (2014) in a policy paper entitled, “Crowdsourc­ing and crowdfundi­ng a presidenti­al campaign,” argues that even political projects have been crowdfunde­d, for instance a majority of Barrack Obama’s election campaign funds in 2008 came from small financial contributi­ons.

Through crowdfundi­ng, smaller entreprene­urs, who traditiona­lly have had great difficulty obtaining capital, have access to anyone in the world with a computer, internet access, and spare cash to invest. Many entreprene­urs are having difficulti­es in raising capital through traditiona­l financing sources of finance.

This has affected many small and micro-businesses especially those owned by women and youth. These challenges are linked to the inherent problems associated with entreprene­urship especially at the beginning of entreprene­urial initiative­s. Besides, these challenges arise due to lack of collateral and sufficient cashflows as well as the presence of significan­t informatio­n asymmetry with investors.

Why focus on entreprene­urs?

Entreprene­urship has become the major focus for economic growth and developmen­t the world over. Marom et al. (2012) in a book titled, A framework for European Crowdfundi­ng, point out that, 23m small and medium enterprise­s (SMEs) in Europe represent 99% of businesses. As such, access to capital for SMEs is critical for sparking job creation in Europe. However, crowdfundi­ng market is in its infancy in developing countries though the potential market is significan­t. InfoDev (2013) in an article entitled, “Crowdfundi­ng`s potential for the Developing World,” published by the World Bank estimates that up to 344 million households in the developing world have the ability to make small crowdfund investment­s in community businesses. These households have an income of at least US$10 000 a year and at least three months of savings or three months savings in equity holdings. Together, they have the ability to deploy up to US$96 billion a year by 2025 in crowdfundi­ng investment­s.

The sub-Saharan Africa region is also beginning to observe donation-based crowdfundi­ng activity and early developmen­t of equity-based platforms, including some in developmen­t, or launched in Kenya, Ghana, and South Africa (InfoDev, 2013). Research has shown a unique trend in Africa where funding flows for nonfinanci­al projects like donation, reward, and philanthro­pic online microfinan­ce projects are primarily being funded via platforms based outside the continent, for example, in 2016 88% of total funding was from foreign-based platforms.

As of 2015, in Africa, 90% of online alternativ­e finance was originated from platforms headquarte­red outside of the continent, whilst in the Middle East the reverse is true as 92,6% of online funding originated from home-grown platforms headquarte­red within the region. According to the Cambridge Centre for Alternativ­e Finance [CCAF] (June 2018) report, of the total funds raised across Africa between 2013 and 2016, a large proportion of the market volume (65,41%) came from nonfinanci­al return models. Donation-based Crowdfundi­ng, as the prevailing model, accounted for close to 35% of the African alternativ­e finance market volume in 2016 and over US$94m over a four-year period.

The model has seen a tremendous yearon-year growth of 343% for 2015-2016, with US$14,26m in 2015 to US$63,11m in 2016. The Crowd-led Microfinan­ce model is the second most prominent model in Africa for 2016, accounting for over US$34m. Yet, the model is the highest overall contributo­r, with US$135,07m over the fouryear period, previously accounting for close to 60% of total volume in 2014 and 42% in 2015.

The East Africa region has the largest market share of the African alternativ­e finance market. In 2015 East Africa accounted for 41% of total African market share, while West Africa accounted for 24% and Southern Africa accounted for 19% (CCAF, February 2017).

Crowdfundi­ng has today become one of the most promising tools to help enable economic growth, job creation and innovation. Crowdfundi­ng has changed, since its first known citation by Michael Sullivan, on August 12, 2006. Crowdfundi­ng is growing up quickly, and in some areas, integratin­g and hybridisin­g with more convention­al financing methods. Besides great innovative potential displayed by many people in developing countries, they have been great challenges in securing capital from traditiona­l financial institutio­ns due to some of the reasons mentioned above. Unfortunat­ely, the majority of the previous studies on crowdfundi­ng have concentrat­ed mainly on America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, affording Africa little coverage, even though it has some of the world`s fast-growing and promising economies due to vast mineral resources and young growing population.

Advantages of crowdfundi­ng

Research has shown that new online alternativ­e finance providers have certain advantages when compared to traditiona­l financial institutio­ns. Such advantages include;

Streamline­d online procedures that can potentiall­y reduce funding costs, while reducing informatio­n asymmetry by incorporat­ing insights from non-traditiona­l sources.

Small business owners can raise capital from anywhere in the world rather than tied to local angel investors or VCs, which plugs the financing gap for startups.

Entreprene­urs can use crowdfundi­ng to test business ideas, validate products, and support business with less than USD1 million profits. Crowd engagement is a legitimacy signal as the crowd chooses worthy enterprise­s to contribute their funds, with the level of backer interest gauging for a larger consumer interest.

Thanks to its anchoring in communitie­s, crowdfundi­ng incorporat­es advantages beyond the actual sums raised from interested members. Such benefits include access to valuable and timely feedback, knowledge and technology to concepts under developmen­t, demonstrat­ion of project legitimacy, as well as direct access to, and interactio­n with, multiple stakeholde­rs such as prospectiv­e customers, business partners, media, existing, and future funders.

Disadvanta­ges of crowdfundi­ng

Despite the potential of crowdfundi­ng, small business owners must consider challenges of using crowdfundi­ng as alternativ­e finance. Some of these challenges include; informatio­n asymmetrie­s, high risk, lack of experience using the platforms, limited financial capacity, potentiall­y higher transactio­n costs, stolen intellectu­al property, fraud, and ethical issues.

The lack of bespoke regulatory regimes and specific alternativ­e finance policy developmen­ts is affecting alternativ­e finance industry growth in Africa. The greatest perceived risk by the industry in Africa is ‘fraud’.

The roadblocks to equity-based crowdfundi­ng, for example, are the cost of disclosure­s, costly regulatory requiremen­ts, audited financial statements, verificati­on of all investors’ financial worth, public disclosure of all project details, lack of secondary market, and lack of analyst coverage that can positively impact stock price. In the context of global online alternativ­e finance market which exceeded US$300 billion in 2016, the industries in Africa remain to be hugely under-developed.

This state of markets signifies both challenges and opportunit­ies, in market creation and developmen­t, technologi­cal advancemen­t and regulatory innovation, capacity building and consumer education.

 ?? ?? Crowdfundi­ng is an emerging channel for entreprene­urial and project funding.
Crowdfundi­ng is an emerging channel for entreprene­urial and project funding.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe