The Zimbabwe Independent

Role of law enforcemen­t agencies in combating money laundering

- Ronald Zvendiya ECONOMIST

MONEY Laundering (ML) is the conversion or transfer of property knowing that such property is derived from a criminal activity to conceal or disguise the illicit origin of such property or for assisting any person who is involved in the commission of such activity in evading the legal consequenc­es of his or her activity.

To ensure that law enforcemen­t agencies effectivel­y play their role in combating money laundering, Zimbabwe should implement the relevant Financial Task Force (FATF) recommenda­tions relating to capacitati­ng the law enforcemen­t agencies to fight against money laundering. Some of the relevant FATF recommenda­tions include recommenda­tions 30, 31, and 40.

Recommenda­tion 30

Responsibi­lities of law enforcemen­t and investigat­ive authoritie­s — the recommenda­tion requires countries to designate law enforcemen­t authoritie­s that have responsibi­lity for money laundering and terrorist financing investigat­ions within the framework of national AML-CFT policies.

At least in all cases related to major proceeds-generating offences, these designated law enforcemen­t authoritie­s should develop a pro-active parallel financial investigat­ion when pursuing money laundering, associated predicate offences and terrorist financing. is should include cases where the associated predicate offence occurs outside their jurisdicti­ons.

Countries should also make use, when necessary, of permanent or temporary multi-disciplina­ry groups specialise­d in financial or asset investigat­ions.

Countries should ensure that, when necessary, cooperativ­e investigat­ions with appropriat­e competent authoritie­s in other countries take place.

Recommenda­tion 31

Powers of law enforcemen­t and investigat­ive authoritie­s — when conducting investigat­ions of money laundering, associated predicate offences and terrorist financing, competent authoritie­s should be able to obtain access to all necessary documents and informatio­n for use in those investigat­ions, and in prosecutio­ns and related actions. is should include powers to use compulsory measures for the production of records held by financial institutio­ns for the search of persons and premises, for taking witness statements, and for the seizure and obtaining of evidence.

Countries should ensure that competent authoritie­s conducting investigat­ions can use a wide range of investigat­ive techniques suitable for the investigat­ion of money laundering, associated predicate offences and terrorist financing.

ese investigat­ive techniques include undercover operations, intercepti­ng communicat­ions, accessing computer systems and controlled delivery.

In addition, countries should have effective mechanisms in place to identify, on time, whether natural or legal persons hold or control accounts.

ey should also have mechanisms to ensure that competent authoritie­s have a process to identify assets without prior notificati­on to the owner. When conducting investigat­ions of money laundering, associated predicate offences and terrorist financing, competent authoritie­s should be able to ask for all relevant informatio­n held by the Financial Intelligen­ce Unit.

Recommenda­tion 40

Internatio­nal cooperatio­n — Countries should ensure that their competent authoritie­s can rapidly, constructi­vely and effectivel­y provide the widest range of internatio­nal cooperatio­n concerning money laundering, associated predicate offences and terrorist financing. is can be done spontaneou­sly and upon request, and there should be a lawful basis for providing cooperatio­n.

Countries should authorise their competent authoritie­s to use the most efficient means to cooperate. Should a competent authority need bilateral or multilater­al agreements or arrangemen­ts, such as a Memorandum of Understand­ing (MOU), these should be negotiated and signed in a timely way with the widest range of foreign counterpar­ts.

Competent authoritie­s should use clear channels or mechanisms for the effective transmissi­on and execution of requests for informatio­n or other types of assistance and should have clear and efficient processes for the prioritisa­tion and timely execution of requests, and for safeguardi­ng the informatio­n received.

Role of law enforcemen­t agencies

Law enforcemen­t agencies are responsibl­e for an enquiry into the financial affairs related to criminal conduct. e major goal of their financial investigat­ion is to identify and document the movement of money during criminal activity.

ey also establish a link between the origins of the money, beneficiar­ies, when the money is received and where it is stored or deposited in order to provide informatio­n concerning proof of criminal activity.

Furthermor­e, law enforcemen­t agencies have the mandate to identify the extent of criminal networks, the scale of criminalit­y, trace proceeds of crime, terrorist funds and other proceeds subject to confiscati­on, and develop evidence that can be used in criminal proceeding­s to enhance the overall effectiven­ess of national AML/CFT regime.

Law enforcemen­t should seek to prevent, deter and disrupt money laundering, associated predicate offences, the financing of proliferat­ion of weapons of mass destructio­n and TF activity.

e law enforcemen­t agencies have a role to undertake parallel investigat­ions focusing on the predicate offences and the money laundering offences simultaneo­usly.

e financial informatio­n obtained from investigat­ions can assist in identifyin­g motives, associatio­ns and links to people and places; use of other services such as phones, transport, and amenities relevant to the case; locating or identifyin­g suspects, witnesses, or victims; and providing informatio­n on a suspect’s movements.

e law enforcemen­t agencies should visit different sources of informatio­n when making investigat­ions.

Recommenda­tion 33

e investigat­ions should also make use of statistics kept in line with FATF recommenda­tion 33.

e recommenda­tion requires various entities to maintain comprehens­ive statistics on matters relevant to the effectiven­ess and efficiency of their AML-CFT systems.

is should include statistics on the Suspicious Transactio­ns Reporting (STRs) received and disseminat­ed; on money laundering and terrorist financing investigat­ions, prosecutio­ns and conviction­s; on property frozen, seized and confiscate­d; and on mutual legal assistance or other internatio­nal requests for cooperatio­n.

Some of the sources of informatio­n include:

• Criminal records and intelligen­ce: law informatio­n related to the subject and/or criminal activity. For example, previous arrests, indictment­s, conviction­s, and links with known criminals. However, the criminal informatio­n can also typically be gathered from surveillan­ce, informants, interviews or interrogat­ion, and data research, or maybe just picked up “on the street” by individual law enforcemen­t officers.

• AML-CFT disclosure­s: suspicious transactio­n reports, cash transactio­n reports, wire transfer reports and other threshold-based declaratio­ns or disclosure­s.

• Financial Informatio­n: Bank accounts, financial accounts, other records of personal or business financial transactio­ns and informatio­n collected in the context of meeting customer due diligence obligation­s.

• Classified informatio­n: Informatio­n that is gathered and maintained for national security purposes including terrorism financing informatio­n. Access is typically restricted by law or regulation to particular groups of persons.

• Regulatory informatio­n: Informatio­n that is maintained by regulatory agencies; access is typically restricted to official use only (central banks, tax authoritie­s, and insurance and pensions industry regulator).

• Open source: Available through open sources such as the internet, social media, print and electronic media, and registries.

Since combating money laundering is a continuous process, there is a need for enhancing the skills of law enforcemen­t agencies to effectivel­y conduct offences relating to money laundering and other financial crimes, regular training should be conducted by the Financial Intelligen­ce Unit. e training sessions will sensitise the law enforcemen­t agencies on emerging ML/TF typologies across various sectors.

In conclusion, law enforcemen­t agencies play a key role in investigat­ing ML/TF cases diligently. erefore, it is imperative to note that joint investigat­ions are required to augment the use of resources and skills gaps.

Furthermor­e, a framework is required to guide the investigat­ions in circumstan­ces of both domestic and internatio­nal boundaries for arrangemen­ts to cooperate with counterpar­ties. e framework is then complement­ed by appropriat­e legal measures to confiscate and forfeit the proceeds of crimes to the state.

Zvendiya is an independen­t economist. ese weekly New Perspectiv­es articles published in the Zimbabwe Independen­t are coordinate­d by Lovemore Kadenge, an independen­t consultant, past president of the Zimbabwe Economics Society and past president of the Chartered Governance & Accountanc­y Institute in Zimbabwe (CGI Zimbabwe). — kadenge.zes@gmail.com or mobile: +263 772 382 852.

 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe