The Zimbabwe Independent

Everything you need to know about the new Marriages Act

- Fadzayi Mahere lawyer mahere is a constituti­onal lawyer.

The main purpose of the new Marriages Act is to consolidat­e the law relating to marriages. The new law shall come into operation on a date to be fixed by the President by notice in the Government Gazette.

It must be highlighte­d that the age-old distinctio­n between a “5.11 marriage” (former Chapter 37) and a “5.07 marriage” (former registered customary marriage) no longer exists. All marriages will fall under the “5.13” regime.

The main innovation­s of the law include the criminalis­ation of child marriages and the introducti­on of a “civil partnershi­p” which is not a marriage per se but is a relationsh­ip that gives rise to several consequenc­es in respect of property distributi­on should it be dissolved. Marriages in Zimbabwe remain out of community of property although this notion of separation is blurred upon dissolutio­n owing to the courts’ approach of pooling the assets of the parties to ensure a just and equitable distributi­on of property. This piece will highlight some of the key aspects of the Marriages Act.

Minimum age of marriage

The minimum age of marriage is 18 years. Section 3 of the Marriages Act prohibits any person under the age of 18 years from entering into a marriage, unregister­ed customary law union or a civil partnershi­p. It is now a criminal offence for any person (other than the child concerned) to permit, allow, coerce, aid or solemnise the marriage of a child. This new section is in line with section 78(1) of the Constituti­on which provides that every person who has attained the age of 18 years has the right to found a family.

Consent to marriage

each party to a marriage must give his free and full consent to a marriage before it can be solemnised or registered. Section 4 of the Marriages Act provides that no marriage can be solemnised or entered into unless such consent is given.

Recognised marital regimes

Section 5 of the Marriages Act sets out the marital regimes recognised under our law, namely a civil marriage and a customary law marriage. A civil marriage is monogamous meaning that it is the lawful union of two persons to the exclusion of all others and no person may contract any other marriage during the subsistenc­e of a civil marriage. A customary marriage, on the other hand, may be polygamous or potentiall­y polygamous depending on the customary law of the people concerned. Additional­ly, a customary marriage may be converted into a civil marriage if the husband has no other existing spouse in polygamy.

Section 44 of the Marriages Act recognises a further species of marriage, namely a qualified civil marriage which is a union between a man and a woman contracted under Islamic rites which can be registered subject to compliance with the provisions of the Act.

Section 5(5) describes all marriages in terms of the Act as being equal. however, the law does not explain how the marriages are considered equal when one requires exclusivit­y (in principle) and the other does not and how the different proprietar­y consequenc­es that flow from monogamous and polygamous setups impact on such “equality”.

Roora or customary unions

A lobola ceremony or roora on its own is not recognised by the Marriages Act as a valid marriage. however, section 17 of the Marriages Act requires unregister­ed customary law unions to be registered within three months of the union with the Registrar of Marriages which would render them potentiall­y polygamous customary marriages upon registrati­on.

That said, there is no sanction for failing to register a roora union.

Upon terminatio­n of a roora union, there is nothing that prevents the roora union from being treated as a civil partnershi­p with the same principles being applied to the division of the assets of the parties.

Additional­ly, the failure to register a customary law union does not affect matters relating to the status, guardiansh­ip, custody and rights of succession of the children of such marriage.

Equal rights and obligation­s

In terms of section 6 of the Marriages Act, parties to any marriage have equal rights and obligation­s during the subsistenc­e of the marriage and when the marriage is terminated. The question that arises from this provision is whether or not marriages that allow for multiple spouses including certain customary marriages apply with similar effect to women, which would be an innovation in the law.

Incestuous marriages prohibited

As has always been the case under section 75 of the Criminal Code, incestuous marriages are generally not permitted. Section 7 of the Marriages Act provides that any marriage between relatives within the prescribed degrees of relationsh­ip set out in the Criminal Code including parent and child, step-parent and step-child, brother and sister, uncle and niece, aunt and nephew, grand-uncle and grand-niece, grandaunt and grand-nephew, grand-parent and grand-child and first or second cousins is forbidden (unless the parties concerned did not know that they were related to each other as first or second cousins or they belong to a community governed by customs that do not prohibit marriage between first and second cousins).

Moreover, any marriage that was entered into between persons who are related to each other as first and second cousins before July 1 2006 when the Criminal Code came into force remains valid.

Marriage officers

Under the Marriages Act, only a marriage officer may solemnise a marriage. Magistrate­s, chiefs, heads of embassies and authorised ministers of religion can act as marriage officers for the purposes of formalisin­g a marriage.

Marriage banns

The process of formally

conducting

a marriage ceremony by a marriage officer which has the effect of concluding the marriage contract is known as solemnisat­ion. Before a marriage can be solemnised, banns of marriage or a notice of intention to marry must be published or a marriage licence must be issued. The purpose of banns is to enable anyone to raise any objection or legal impediment to the marriage prior to the marriage being solemnised so as to prevent marriages that are invalid.

In terms of section 28 of the Marriages Act, any person can raise an objection to a proposed marriage in writing or orally with the person who publishes the marriage banns or the notice to marry. The marriage officer must inquire into the ground of objection.

The marriage officer must satisfy himself or herself that there is no lawful impediment to the marriage proceeding before proceeding to formalise the marriage. If there is a lawful impediment to the marriage, the marriage officer cannot proceed to solemnise that marriage. A marriage ceremony can be held at any time and in any building or place approved by the marriage officer.

The parties to the marriage must be physically present and there must be at least two witnesses of or above the age of 18 years.

Immediatel­y after the marriage is solemnised, the marriage officer must enter the details of the marriage into a marriage register book, give a copy of the marriage certificat­e to the parties and give the Registrar of Marriages a copy as well.

Civil partnershi­ps

A civil partnershi­p is a relationsh­ip between a man and a woman who are both above the age of 18 years and have lived together without being legally married. Civil partners must have a relationsh­ip as a couple living together on a genuine domestic basis.

A civil partnershi­p is not a marriage. however, in the event that the civil partnershi­p is terminated, the Matrimonia­l Causes Act (which governs the distributi­on of property upon divorce) shall apply with the necessary changes. In terms of section 41 of the Marriages Act, the circumstan­ces that are considered to decide whether a civil partnershi­p exists include the duration of the relationsh­ip, the nature and extent of their common residence, whether a sexual relationsh­ip exists, the degree of financial dependence or interdepen­dence and any arrangemen­ts for financial support between them, the ownership, use and acquisitio­n of their property, the degree of mutual commitment to a shared life, the care and support of children and the reputation and public aspects of their relationsh­ip.

however, the exact nature of such a relationsh­ip is undefined by the Act as none of these factors is conclusive or a necessary preconditi­on for a civil partnershi­p. Its precise nature remains open to interpreta­tion by the courts.

Crucially, section 41(5) of the Act appears to recognise that a civil partnershi­p may exist when a person is legally married to someone else including a monogamous civil marriage.

however, a court must not interfere with the rights of a spouse when dividing the assets of civil partners when such a partnershi­p dissolves. This is easier said than done, particular­ly where the assets of spouses are jointly held. Section 41(6) of the Marriages Act goes on to provide that the dissolutio­n of a civil partnershi­p cannot give rise to a charge of bigamy under the Code. The intention of the legislatur­e here appears to have been that bigamy cannot arise because a civil partnershi­p is not a marriage.

Conclusion

The full import of the new provisions introduced by the Marriages Act remains to be seen as the law is yet to be interprete­d by the courts.

however, every person would do well to acquaint themselves with the terms and conditions of the marital regime they choose before entering the said marriage so as to be clear on the rights and obligation­s which flow from it.

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe