The Zimbabwe Independent

Celebratin­g Zim’s removal from grey list

- Jeoffrey mugwagwa policy analyst

This is part one of an article that looks at the removal of Zimbabwe from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) grey list and the significan­ce going forward.

On March 4, Zimbabwe was removed from the FATF grey list. When the FATF places a jurisdicti­on under increased monitoring, it means the country has committed to swiftly resolve the identified strategic deficienci­es within agreed timeframes and is subject to increased monitoring.

Jurisdicti­ons under increased monitoring actively work with FATF to address strategic deficienci­es in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing and proliferat­ion financing. The Eastern and southern Africa Anti-Money Laundering Group (EsAAMLG) 7th enhanced follow up report on Zimbabwe indicated that the country would remain in enhanced follow-up and will continue to inform the EsAAMLG of the progress made in improving and implementi­ng its AML/CFT measures.

Zimbabwe is a member of the EsAAMLG whose aim is to combat money laundering by implementi­ng the FATF recommenda­tions.

There are 18 other member countries in east and southern Africa as well as a number of regional and internatio­nal observers such as AUsTRAC, Commonweal­th secretaria­t, East African Community, FATF, iMF, sADC, United Kingdom, United states of America, UNODC, World Bank and World Customs Organisati­on. EsAAMLG is a regional-styled body which is a member of the FATF.

The FATF is an inter-government­al policymaki­ng body whose purpose is to establish internatio­nal standards, and to develop and promote policies, both at national and internatio­nal levels, to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism.

The EsAAMLG evaluated the anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism and proliferat­ion financing regime of Zimbabwe under its second Round of Mutual Evaluation­s from 15-24 July 2015.

The Mutual Evaluation Report (MER) was adopted by the EsAAMLG Council of Ministers in september 2016. According to the MER, Zimbabwe was Compliant (C) with eleven (11) Recommenda­tions, Largely Compliant (LC) with nine (9) Recommenda­tions, Partially Compliant (PC) with fourteen (14) Recommenda­tions and Non-Compliant (NC) with six (6) Recommenda­tions. Out of the eleven (11) immediate Outcomes (iOs), Zimbabwe was rated Moderate Level of Effectiven­ess on two (2) iOs and Low Level of Effectiven­ess on nine (9) iOs.

some of the noted major shortfalls during the 2015 mutual evaluation were as follows,

•No

mechanism(s) to communicat­e results of the National Risk Assessment (NRA)

The authoritie­s did not demonstrat­e an understand­ing of the Money Laundering / Terrorist Financing (ML/TF) risks identified in the NRA, and, as a result, they had not applied a risk-based approach to allocation of resources and implementa­tion of Anti Money Laundering / Counter Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) measures to prevent or mitigate ML/TF risks.

There was no specific requiremen­t for Financial institutio­ns (Fis) and Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Profession­s (DNFBPs) to include informatio­n on high-risk areas into their risk assessment­s.

No specific requiremen­t for Fis and DNFBPs to assess and understand their

ML/TF risks, document the risks, consider the category of the risk and the appropriat­e mitigating controls, and have measures to communicat­e the risk assessment­s to supervisor­s; no requiremen­t to develop and adopt procedures, policies and controls at a senior management level to manage and mitigate the risks nor monitor implementa­tion of the controls and procedures with a view to adjusting them when necessary; and no specific obligation for Fis and DNFBPs to apply simplified measures on the basis of the level of risk.

The notable additional actions taken by Zimbabwe to address these short falls were

Zimbabwe developed a National AML/ CFT strategic Plan 2020-2025 which has four strategic objectives: (a) Parallel Financial investigat­ions, (b) Capacity Building Awareness and supervisio­n, (c) Asset forfeiture and Confiscati­on and, (d) Beneficial Ownership and NPOs.

The Zimbabwe Financial intelligen­ce Unit (FiU) has incorporat­ed the major predicate offenses that were identified in the NRA in their prioritisa­tion of cases for analysis and has created specialise­d desks to focus on each of the predicate offenses listed in the NRA.

Various units have been establishe­d in some agencies such as the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority (ZiMRA) (to focus on tax evasion) National Prosecutio­n Authority (NPA)(to focus on corruption) and Zimbabwe Republic Police (ZRP) to undertake specialise­d functions.

The ZRP has set up units such as Asset Forfeiture Unit, Counter Terrorism Unit, Police Anti-Corruption Unit, a CiD Minerals, Flora and Fauna, and others to effectivel­y combat ML/TF.

in relation to legislatio­n, Zimbabwe introduced some provisions in the Money Laundering and Proceeds of Crime Act in 2018 to strengthen the process. civil forfeiture

What does this mean for Zimbabwe?

Zimbabwe’s removal from the list of countries that are considered to be insufficie­ntly compliant in implementi­ng AML/CFT standards is an important milestone in Zimbabwe considerin­g that the country is already facing a myriad of challenges ranging from sanctions, high levels of corruption to name just a few.

This explains why Zimbabwe has seen a massive de-risking by most correspond­ent banks in the past decade.

This has negatively impacted the country’s ability to effect cross border payments, resulting in financial exclusion. Donor payments, lines of credits, money transfer payments(remittance­s) and developmen­tal finance have also not been spared by this developmen­t.

The removal of Zimbabwe from the FATF grey list of countries with strategic AML/CFT deficienci­es will improve the country's perceived risk and will most likely see an increased appetite from correspond­ent banks.

Related to the FATF stance on the country, the European Union (EU) has also come up with a policy on high risk third countries.

The aim is to protect the integrity of the EU financial system. Zimbabwe is part of the countries added on to the list on 01 October 2020. The effect of Zimbabwe being removed on the FATF grey list would be that it could also be seen as less risky by the EU.

The EU follows moral suasion as an appeal to compliance, to influence or change behaviour when listing and delisting high risk third countries based on their progress and efforts being made to address the noted deficienci­es by the FATF.

in its assessment on removing countries with strategic deficienci­es in their regimes on anti-money laundering and countering terrorist financing, the EU takes into account new informatio­n from internatio­nal organisati­ons and standard setters, such as those issued by FATF.

Zimbabwe’s commitment to remediatin­g the identified deficienci­es will go a long way in contributi­ng to the removal of the country from the list of identified high-risk third countries with strategic deficienci­es.

The removal of the country from the FATF grey list and the potential removal from the EU high risk third countries list could boost the prospects of attracting new foreign direct investment in the country and increase attractive­ness of the country for potential credit lines.

This is because adherence to AML/CFT standards is a major risk factor considered for jurisdicti­onal profiling by correspond­ent bankers and internatio­nal creditors. subsequent­ly, even internatio­nal cross border flow of funds will improve owing to an improvemen­t in AML/CFT controls.

important to note that Zimbabwe is also listed as the 12th riskiest country by the Basel institute of Governance. The removal of Zimbabwe from the FATF grey list means the Zimbabwe’s Basel AML index could improve.

•will

The second and final part of this article

be in the next edition

mugwagwa writes in his capacity as a councillor for the Compliance society of Zimbabwe. — admin@cosoz.com. These weekly New perspectiv­es articles published in the Zimbabwe Independen­t are coordinate­d by Lovemore Kadenge, an independen­t consultant, past president of the Zimbabwe economics society and past president of the Chartered Governance & Accountanc­y Institute in Zimbabwe (CGI Zimbabwe). — kadenge.zes@gmail.com or mobile: +263 772 382 852.

 ?? ?? Cross-boarder traders who used to enjoy high profit margins after sales are having a torrid time smuggling goods into the country after various units have been establishe­d in some agencies such as the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority (to focus on tax evasion) National Prosecutio­n Authority(to focus on corruption) and Zimbabwe Republic Police to undertake specialise­d functions. Various goods have been impounded at Beitbridge Border post
Cross-boarder traders who used to enjoy high profit margins after sales are having a torrid time smuggling goods into the country after various units have been establishe­d in some agencies such as the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority (to focus on tax evasion) National Prosecutio­n Authority(to focus on corruption) and Zimbabwe Republic Police to undertake specialise­d functions. Various goods have been impounded at Beitbridge Border post
 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe