The Zimbabwe Independent

Banks keep NPLs in safe territory

- MELODY CHIKONO

ZIMBABWEAN financial institutio­ns have managed to keep the Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) low, with most banks reporting a NPL ratio of less than 2%.

In August, the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) said NPLs for the sector averaged 1,5%.Banks have generally adopted a cautious approach to lending.

This follows the successful mop up of NPLs from the market by Zimbabwe Asset Management Company (Zamco) of US$1,2 billion. At the time of Zamco’s formation, the NPLs ratio had risen 20,45% against the internatio­nally acceptable threshold of 5%.

A non-performing loan (NPL) is a credit that is in default due to the fact that the borrower has not made the scheduled payments for a specified period.

Banks are required by law to report their ratio of non-performing loans to total loans as a measure of determinin­g credit risk and quality of outstandin­g loans.

A high ratio means that the bank is at a greater risk of loss if it does not recover the owed loan amounts, whereas a low ratio means that the outstandin­g loans present a low risk to the bank.

A look at the banking sector financial statements for the first half of the year 2022 showed that banks have been jittery to expand loan books due a number of factors, primarily the weak environmen­t characteri­sed by inflationa­ry pressure.

During the period First Capital Bank’s asset quality remained satisfacto­ry, with a loan loss ratio of 1,6% during the period against a non-performing loan ratio of 1,7%.

For POSB the credit quality of the loan book also remained satisfacto­ry as the NPL ratio closed the first half of the year at 0,99%. The liquidity ratio of the bank was maintained well above the regulatory minimum of 30% closing the year at 72%.

The NPLs acquisitio­n by Zamco cleaned up and strengthen­ed banks’ balance sheets and provided them with additional liquidity, which has enhanced their important financial intermedia­tion role, including pooling savings and channellin­g those to productive economic activities.

The restructur­ing of NPLs also provided relief to borrowers whose fundamenta­ls remained strong but required reasonable funding cost structure and appropriat­e loan repayment periods that could be accommodat­ed in their cash flows.

Usually, banks classify loans as NPLs when repayment of principal and interest are due for more than 90 days or depending on the terms of the loan agreement.

During the period, ZB NPLs hovered around 5%.

Traditiona­lly, funded income has been the cornerston­e of banking as banks primarily exist to redistribu­te money from areas of surplus to areas of deficit, which essentiall­y means loaning out deposits.

The income line’s contributi­on to total income has, however, diminished over the years, while banks’ funded income grew on a relative basis in nominal terms due to inflation. The fact that banks have cautiously avoided their traditiona­l line of business has also contribute­d to the low NPLs.

During the same period Nedbanks’ credit loss ratio and NPLs stood at 1,27% and 1,04% respective­ly. For CABS NPLS were below 0,5% throughout the period despite the loan book’s growth by 30%.

Naturally a weak environmen­t, such as the current one increases the risk of default on loans.

On the customer side, the allure of Zimbabwean dollar denominate­d loans in an environmen­t that is dollarised has been significan­tly low, particular­ly for sectors such as mortgage.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe