Project MG Midget
REPORT: SIMON GOLDSWORTHY As explained last issue, we are rattling through the build-up of our long-term Midget project, condensing many weeks of work down to the bare bones to fit in the final two instalments.
We are nearing the end now, as attention turns to the interior, the underside and the fuel system on our Mk3 Midget.
We would hate to overstay our welcome, so this is going to be the Readers Digest of builds. However, alongside a condensed version of the work, we will also highlight some difficulties we had and the solutions we came up with. Therefore, please do bear with us if we bounce around a little and if an item that is fitted in one picture is no longer there in a later one!
Last issue we had the engine rebuilt and the front suspension, brakes and steering back on the car. In the meantime, I had also finished off the paint – the all-important outer panels were done professionally, but I still had to do the interior and underneath. These were jobs I was not looking forward to. In truth most of the interior panels will end up being covered by insulation and carpet anyway, but having gone this far I wanted to know that the bodyshell was all fully protected both inside and underneath.
The exterior has been painted in twopack, and while there was some paint left over for touching up, I don’t have the necessary breathing equipment for spraying this safely. So, rooting around in the garage I found a large tin of Pimento Red cellulose paint left over from a Skoda 1000MB restoration some years ago. I also had some cellulose high build primer from the same job, plus a tin of red oxide primer. To these I added a tin of bright red Hammerite Smooth paint that I picked up from my local hardware store, and a tin of brushable seam sealer.
Starting with the interior of the car, this was a mixture of the original orange paint, primer blown on to protect the most recent repairs, the remains of some original factory bitumin and – on the gearbox tunnel – enough fibres from the original sound deadening to make it look like a small Labrador. All of this had
to come off with wire brushes in angle grinders and drills, a horrible job that I find is best tackled in stages – get the worst off one night, return the next to clean up most of what remains, then go back later for a final stint to clean up the last details.
The metal underneath these layers was clean and sound, but it would have been near impossible to bring it back to the shiny state required for regular paint. That was where my Hammerite plan came in, because this is designed to go over metal that has surface rust. (Note that this means sound metal with surface rust, not crumbly old iron that is substantially weakened or covered with flaking rust.) My plan was to brush the seam sealant on all joints, both original ones from MG and those created by Alan when welding in new metal. When this had dried, I covered the entire interior with two coats of the bright red Hammerite Smooth.
Moving then to the front wheelarches, these were already clean as they had been included in the grit blasting escapade some months previously and then protected with primer. So I sealed up any joints with the seam sealer, then painted it with the Pimento Red paint – I used cellulose paint here rather than Hammerite because it is softer and more resilient to stone damage. However, I wasn’t happy with the way the texture of the seam sealant was visible through the paint, so I covered it with stonechip then painted them again.
I chose to line the interior with Dynamat.
As well as sound insulation advantages, this creates a 100% waterproof barrier. That may seem counter-intuitive in a convertible that is bound to leak a little water now and then, but I have thought it through. I don’t want felt sound deadening material under the carpet because this can soak up water like a sponge and hold it next to the metal – I still remember how difficult it was to dry out an MG ZT with a leaking sunroof drain some years ago! And besides, I think a cheap fun car like the Midget feels all wrong if it is too sumptuously trimmed with deep pile wool carpets and thick felt etc. The Dynamat will give a slightly softened feel under thin carpet, which is all I want. And because I bought a cheap nylon carpet, this will be easy to dry out if it ever gets wet.
The only downside of buying cheap carpet is that it doesn’t fit particularly well. The flat sections of floor were no problem, but the carpet sections that had to glue over the curved rear wheelarches and chassis rails were quite impossible to shape accurately over the metal. Rather than end up with a mess, I re-used the old sections for these areas that were properly shaped, either by design or through years of being in position. Fortunately these areas were not as dirty as those that go on the floor, so I shampoo’d them, hosed and rinsed
them down and left them on the radiator in the house to dry while I ordered up a tin of contact adhesive.
Now I could finally start building the car back up. This was quite a daunting prospect, because I had not taken most of it apart. I was faced with several boxes and tins of unidentified hardware and had to figure out what went where. The only way I could approach this without getting overwhelmed was to sift through the boxes, find something I could identify, check that it wouldn’t obscure another part if I fitted it now and if not, put it on the car. That way, when I next went to the pile of bits, there would be one less item to sift through. The trick was never to look too far ahead, but plod away one bit at a time knowing that however small progress was each time, it was still progress.
This did mean that the order in which the bits were fitted may be slightly eccentric, but there is rarely a single correct way of putting a car back together. I did have one massive help in this process when Alan leant me his 1973 Midget to use as a reference. Without having this to hand, I would certainly have struggled more and taken even longer, especially where bits on my car were missing. Two of the few items to be AWOL were the dash support brackets. I assumed that they had been taken off when the
previous owner had fitted an extra dial unit below the dash. Unfortunately they are not currently available new. Trawling the secondhand market, I found a pair for £10. Naturally I later found one in my pile of parts and expect that the other is lurking somewhere, but that is pretty much inevitable. I had also mislaid my carburettor heatshield support brackets, items which are also NCA. Again the secondhand market came to the rescue – two heatshields (which I don’t need) and a pair of brackets for another £10.
I had bought and fitted a new wiring loom, but the rev counter was a wiring puzzle because the terminals on the back did not match any of the wiring diagrams, and the old loom had two white wires joined together rather than feeding the gauge as expected. I asked Roger Parker at the MGOC about this, and his reply was most helpful: ‘Between 1964 and 1972 MG used an electronic rev counter of the RVI type, then moved to the more reliable RVC type. The RVI electronic tacho operated by monitoring the small pulses in the power feed to the coil as the points switched it on and off. As soon as electronic ignition conversions started to appear in the 1970s, it was found that the RVI tacho would either not work, or work inaccurately. The wiring of the RVI tachos sees the white wire power feed from the ignition switch to coil routed via the tacho – that is the male and female bullet connection you have found connected together. On the back of the early RVI tachos is a loop of wire that is secured to the body in an insulated metal ‘shoe,’ and the ends of the loop wire are terminated in a male and female bullet. The intended connection is that the power feed which
you have connected together is separated and each end connected to this loop, which is how it measures RPM.
‘Later versions of the RVI tacho moved that wire loop inside the body of the tacho, so you then only had a single male bullet sticking out from the exposed circuit board on the back of your tacho. This now monitors coil switching directly via a separate wire connection from the switched side of the coil on its negative terminal. The main wiring loom was reconfigured, and the power feed between the ignition switch and coil (positive) was fully enclosed in the wiring loom, and went directly between those two points. On the back of the tacho there was a quite similar look with the same green wire power feed spade terminal and subordinate light connections, but now just a single male bullet connection for the new extra wire from the negative side of the coil. This is the format you have on your tacho.
‘RVC tachos work perfectly well with electronic ignition and so it has become quite a common conversion for earlier RVI equipped cars (Midget, MGB etc). The usual conversion format is to join the wiring loom’s white wires with the male and female bullet connections together, as is the case on your car, to restore the power feed to the coil. Then a new wire is added between the negative terminal of the coil and the single male bullet connection on the back of the tacho.’
Thanks Rog.