Computer Music

AUDIONAMIX XTRAX STEMS 2

Can the second iteration of this cloud-based mix separation app improve on its innovative but functional­ly-flawed predecesso­r?

- Web audionamix.com

We weren’t hugely impressed by version 1 of Audionamix’s standalone stem extraction software when we reviewed it in 255 (6/10). Apart from Windows compatibil­ity, Xtrax Stems 2 doesn’t add much in the way of major new features – but it is a free update for existing users, so that’s fair enough.

In a nutshell, this cloud-based applicatio­n analyses an imported source mix and splits it into ‘Vocal’, ‘Drum’ and ‘Music’ (ie, everything else) stems, which can be rebalanced or entirely isolated for extraction of acapellas, beats, etc.

Divide and conquer

The process of dividing a track into stems remains unchanged. Dragging your source file (WAV, AIF, AAC, MP3, M4A) into the interface uploads it to the cloud, where it’s automatica­lly ‘separated’ (using the new Advanced algorithm by default, or one of the two older algorithms if specified). You have to log in at launch, but at least the software now remembers your details.

When the separation is finished, the three stems appear in the interface, each with its own Level, Pan, Solo and Mute controls for individual isolation, removal and adjustment. The new Separation Balance control enables tweaking of the stems (see Balancing act); and the separation algorithms are “fully conservati­ve”, so with the three stems at their default settings, you’re hearing the source mix exactly in its original form. Each algorithm has to run the full separation routine the first time it’s activated, but once that’s done for all three, you can fluidly switch between them for on-the-fly comparison.

Once you’re happy with the separation, the stems can be exported as individual WAV files or a Native Instrument­s Stem MP4 file. Job done.

Alongside Separation Balance, the other significan­t new feature in Xtrax Stems 2 is the aforementi­oned Advanced separation option, which is “based on a new, deep neural networkbas­ed algorithm”. Audionamix claim that this works 30% faster and yields much higher quality results than the original and still-in-place Automatic HQ and Generic HQ options when it comes to separating solo and ensemble vocals. In our testing, we found it to be essentiall­y as hitand-miss as the other two, dependent upon the qualities of the source material; but when it does ‘hit’, it makes a cleaner job of isolating vocals for use as acapellas and the creation of vocal-free backing tracks from the remaining material. As for the speed boost, while Advanced is noticeably nippier than the miserably slow HQ algorithms, the process is still anything but quick, taking six minutes and 20 seconds to separate a six-minute-long MP3 over a 50mbps fibre connection.

Unchanged since v1, incidental­ly, Automatic HQ separates vocals only when it detects them, while Generic HQ separates the ‘lead’ melodic line constantly, be it a vocal, a synth, a trumpet or whatever. The speedier but less effective nonHQ alternativ­es have been dropped.

Stem sell

As the score shows, our opinion of Xtrax Stems hasn’t been radically changed by version 2. It all takes too long; artefacts and bleed still abound; and we struggle to find any meaningful use for it beyond vocal extraction, where it finds most of its success. Having said that, the new Advanced algorithm and Separation Balance mixer are worthy additions, taking Audionamix’s ambitious concept another step in the right direction. We look forward to version 3!

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia