Cosmos

VIRTUAL PALAEONTOL­GY

Fossil researcher­s are putting aside trowels and brushes in place ultra-high-tech synchrotro­ns. DYANI LEWIS reports.

- DYANI LEWIS is a freelance science journalist based in Melbourne.

DYANI LEWIS investigat­es the new technology changing our planet’s fossil record, plus NATALIE PARLETTA explores Naracoorte’s caves of dinosaur wonders.

AS FAR ANYONE CAN TELL, the briefcase-sized slab of sandstone was surreptiti­ously cut from the Gobi Desert in southern Mongolia sometime prior to 2011.

BY 2015, it had been spirited out of the Central Asian nation, passing through the hands of private collectors in China, Japan, the UK and elsewhere, and into the possession of François Escuillié, a French palaeontol­ogist and fossil dealer.

It wasn’t, of course, the sandstone that Escuillié was interested in, but the near-complete skeleton of a duck-sized dinosaur it encased. The fossil that lay half-buried, half-exposed in the red rock was clearly a striking specimen.

Escuillié knew he had an important find on his hands. But instead of offering it up to the highest bidder, he handed the poached dinosaur to Andrea Cau and colleagues at The Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences in Brussels, who would work out what it was, and then return it to Mongolia.

When Cau first set about identifyin­g the long-dead animal, he was dubious. Palaeontol­ogists have been chipping away at Mongolia’s fossil-rich Djadochta Formation for decades. That single ancient layer of

Cretaceous rock has given the world some 5% of all known dinosaur species.

Among its most treasured finds is Velocirapt­or of Jurassic Park fame, along with numerous other members of the dinosaur family that gave rise to modern birds. But the dinosaur hotspot – formed some 71-75 million years ago – has become a magnet for unscrupulo­us fossil poachers.

The fossil was unlike anything Cau had seen: a bizarre mix of features that don’t usually belong together. Along with the shady history of how it left Mongolia, there were other ominous signs: bits of bone knocked loose by the poachers had been glued back into place and plaster filled out parts of the skull.

Cau, now at the Giovanni Capellini geological and palaeontol­ogical Museum in Bologna, Italy, wasn’t sure whether what he was looking at was fabulous or fraudulent. “We wanted to be sure that it was not a ‘chimera’ assembled using bones from different dinosaurs or even including fake bones,” he says.

Geographic It’s a legitimate magazine concern: unveiled in the 1999, birdlike National Archaeorap­tor, dinosaur evolution. a claimed The fossil “missing was later link” revealed in to be a clever forgery, a glued-together mash-up of spare parts from at least two different species.

Cau wasn’t taking any chances. He flew the fossil to Grenoble, at the foot of the French Alps. There, he blasted the slab of sandstone with X-rays so powerful they penetrated the rock to reveal the skeleton locked inside, down to its tiniest detail.

The results removed all doubts: the fossil, which Cau’s team named Halszkarap­tor escuilliei (honouring Escuillié for the specimen’s return), was no fake. But that’s not all the particle accelerato­r at the European Synchrotro­n Radiation Facility (ESRF) did.

With the six-terabytes-worth of data collected, Cau and his colleagues created a virtual fossil – a digital facsimile they could turn over and inspect on a computer screen.

The slender swan-like neck, the duck-billed head, the flipper-shaped forelimbs, and the fierce hind claws were all thrown into sharp relief. They had uncovered a strange dinosaur, an earthbound predator that swam and hunted fish in the late-Cretaceous wetlands.

The powerful X-ray beam revealed an even deeper truth than simply what Halszkarap­tor looked like. Peering inside the bones, Cau’s team could see individual growth rings – similar to a tree’s growth rings – that showed the creature to be around two years old when it died.

Exposing this level of detail without painstakin­gly excavating each and every bone from the rock, and without slicing priceless fossils in half, was unthinkabl­e just 20 years ago. Palaeontol­ogy still conjures up images of intrepid fossil-hunters prizing apart shale with a pick-axe or sifting through dirt on a cave floor. But that’s changing.

Scientists like Cau are turning to virtual fossils, warding off the kind of damage that leaves caliper marks on irreplacea­ble pieces of the Earth’s natural heritage, and laying bare intricate details that give scientists insights into prehistori­c life like never before.

PALAEONTOL­OGISTS FIRST SEIZED on flesh- and bonepenetr­ating X-rays not long after Wilhelm Röntgen snapped the first X-ray image, of his wife’s hand, on a December day in 1895. After the discovery of the mysterious Piltdown Man remains in 1912 – a proposed “missing link” between apes and humans – it was X-ray images of the jawbone and teeth that British scientists turned to, to check their authentici­ty. The remains were later shown to be a forgery.

In the 1970s, palaeontol­ogists were again taking note when hospitals began installing medical computed tomography (CT) scanners: machines that combined X-ray measuremen­ts from multiple angles into virtual slices through an entire specimen.

By the mid-1980s, pioneers in the field, such as palaeoanth­ropologist Glenn Conroy from Washington University Medical School in St. Louis, Missouri, were taking CT scans of some of humanity’s earliest known

relatives, peering into skulls filled with stone to see how brains swelled with the march of evolution.

Synchrotro­n particle accelerato­rs – like the one in Grenoble – turbo-charge X-ray technology further still. While Conroy was looking at medical CT scan slices about as thick as a coin (two millimetre­s), synchrotro­ns slice fossils into slivers just 1/1000th of a millimetre thick. The resolution today is at least a four-fold improvemen­t on the best CT scanners.

But it’s not just about resolution. Synchrotro­ns see things that are invisible to convention­al medical CT – or even the highest resolution micro-CT – scanner. In a CT scanner, dense materials show up because they stop more X-rays from passing through. But a synchrotro­n also picks up the tiny deflection­s that occur when X-rays pass from one material to another, even if they have a similar density. The outline of a fossil embedded in rock, for instance, or an insect trapped in amber, pops out, clear as day.

The making of the synchrotro­n as the high-tech go-to tool for palaeontol­ogists is largely down to the dogged work of Paul Tafforeau. In 2000 he was completing his PhD, looking for ways of viewing the insides of fossil teeth without cutting into them. Micro-CT was new at the time, but even that wasn’t up to the task. A chance conversati­on with José Baruchel, then head of the imaging group at the synchrotro­n, set him on a new path.

On weekends and during holidays – whenever Baruchel found a free slot in the busy schedule –

Tafforeau would pack his extinct primate teeth into his bag and make the four-hour drive from Montpellie­r to Grenoble. The synchrotro­n exposed exquisite details of the internal microstruc­tures of teeth, features that were previously only seen by slicing a tooth open, destroying it in the process.

“For fossil material, it’s becoming the gold standard,” says palaeoanth­ropologist Tanya Smith from Australia’s Griffith University, who has been working with Tafforeau on the teeth of Neandertha­ls and other prehistori­c human relatives since 2004.

By that time, Tafforeau had finished his PhD and chalked up enough wins that the ESRF decided to bring him on as a palaeontol­ogy imaging specialist. It’s still the only synchrotro­n in the world to employ a dedicated palaeontol­ogist.

TEETH ARE OFTEN THE LAST remaining vestiges of our past. When bones disintegra­te, teeth endure. A single tooth can rewrite what we know about when and where our ancient relatives lived. But a single disembodie­d tooth can also confound, because it’s not always clear who the tooth belonged to.

“From the outside, you can’t tell: is it an orangutan or a human?” says Smith. That changes when you can glimpse what’s inside. The thickness of the enamel and the shape of the underlying dentine can give crucial clues.

In 2009, Smith and Tafforeau put to rest a debate that had simmered for more than a century. When

Eugène Dubois uncovered teeth, a thigh bone and a chunk of skull during excavation­s on the Indonesian island of Java in the 1890s, he thought he’d found the coveted “missing link” between apes and humans. Unlike the forged Piltdown Man, the specimens were genuine.

But not everyone was convinced by the newly described “Java Man”. Some thought them ape; others, modern humans. Images captured by the synchrotro­n settled the debate once and for all. Digital sections of the teeth revealed internal structures that confirmed the Java Man molars were from Homo erectus, an archaic human lineage – not ape, nor modern human – that arrived in Indonesia as far back as a million years ago.

Virtual teeth are also writing, for the first time, the history of how modern childhood evolved. Compared to our closest living relatives, humans have a protracted childhood. We are utterly dependent on our parents until at least the age of six or seven, and continue developing through a teenage phase, the only animals to do so. Our cousins, chimpanzee­s, fend for themselves far earlier and reach adulthood in half the time.

What Smith and others wanted to know was how far back in the human family tree this lengthy childhood could be traced. That data is locked inside teeth. As

teeth develop, they squeeze out enamel in a daily rhythm producing tiny internal growth lines – similar to tree rings, and the Halszkarap­tor’s bones – in the enamel. Longer-period lines and stressful events like birth are etched onto the outside of the tooth. Together, these marks can be used to calculate how long a tooth takes to grow and erupt.

For five years, Smith and Tafforeau got hold of as many teeth as they could from the Middle Palaeolith­ic, between 30,000 and 200,000 years ago. Museum curators came around to the idea that they could safely put their priceless specimens in front of Tafforeau’s 60 kilo-electron-volt beamline – one of 47 at the facility.

A person would be dead inside an hour, but a fossil tooth – or a jaw with unerupted teeth still embedded within the bone – would be undamaged. Curators brought teeth from nine Neandertha­ls and three Palaeolith­ic Homo sapiens to the synchrotro­n – samples unlikely to ever be cut. “That type of project, where you look at a larger cohort of individual­s, wasn’t possible using physical [sectioning],” says Smith. “If you look at a single fossil, it’s really hard to tease out, do they differ on average?”

And the results: “In all cases, [Neandertha­l] teeth are growing faster,” says Smith. “They’re maturing more quickly than modern humans.”

Neandertha­ls weren’t maturing as fast as chimpanzee­s, though. Neither were our more distant relatives, Australopi­thecines from Africa that lived one to two million years ago, suggesting that childhoods have been slowing in our branch of the family tree line for a long time, but the brakes have really been put on in our own species relatively recently.

TAFFOREAU HASN’T JUST BEEN lashing teeth with the synchrotro­n’s X-rays. While completing his PhD, he was already convincing others to test the machine’s mettle with their own specimens.

Over the years, he and his colleagues have used the particle accelerato­r to lay bare intricate details of the only known example of a fossilised brain; the digested remains of fish and beetles encased in Triassic lungfish poo; and a benign tumour in the vertebra of a teenaged Australopi­thecine who lived in southern Africa nearly two million years ago, among others.

Some of the most spectacula­r discoverie­s made with synchrotro­ns are of animals in amber. Since ancient times, people have been turning fossilised tree sap – which looks like honey turned to stone – into jewellery and fineries. Gemstones with beetles or even small snakes and birds trapped inside are prized by private collectors and palaeontol­ogists alike.

Not all amber is honey-clear, though: opaque amber looks more like lumps of caramel toffee, and there’s no telling from the outside what lies within. But the X-ray vision of the synchrotro­n sees straight through it.

“You never know what you will find,” says Tafforeau. “We discover complete fossilised animals where we were not expecting them.” Dozens of new ants, wasps and beetles from the Cretaceous have been discovered. One insect – a dragonfly – was named after Baruchel, the physicist who started Tafforeau on his synchrotro­n journey nearly two decades ago.

But the real challenge has been making scans of large objects possible. Almost as soon as he started fulltime work at the synchrotro­n, Tafforeau was asked to work out how to scan the near-complete Toumaï skull,

discovered in Chad in 2001. The seven-million-yearold remains represent the oldest known hominin, the earliest human family member after the human and chimpanzee lineages split.

At roughly the size of a large eggplant, the Toumaï skull isn’t huge. But it’s large enough to absorb 99.99% of the X-rays from the synchrotro­n’s beam. Typically, an image can only be computed if at least 10% of the X-rays pass through. Tafforeau was undeterred. “I was not thinking like a physicist,” he says, “I was only thinking like a palaeontol­ogist.”

So, he tinkered. Fiddling with the beam parameters and the tomography algorithms he could fool the system into requiring fewer X-rays to form an image. And a final trick: he placed the skull in an aluminium bowl to bounce more X-rays onto the detector. After two years of troublesho­oting, the Toumaï skull was finally scanned in 2006, blazing the path for even larger specimens, including, in 2016, Cau’s sandstone-entombed Halszkarap­tor.

The synchrotro­n beam in Grenoble went dark in December last year for a 150 million Euro upgrade to a new Extremely Brilliant Source (EBS). On Tafforeau’s beamline, the refurbishe­d equipment is being designed with larger specimens in mind, ensuring that Grenoble will continue to be a mecca for palaeontol­ogists.

When they re-open the doors in early 2021, Tafforeau is hoping to scan some of the world’s most spectacula­r finds. He and colleagues have already done test-runs of mummified animals in preparatio­n for scans of complete Egyptian mummies in the larger beamline chamber.

Other curiositie­s are on his wishlist, too. Fossils as big as a 1.5-metre long skull of a Tyrannosau­rus rex, for instance, could also be giving up their hidden secrets in coming years. “That’s completely impossible today with any synchrotro­n in the world.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Early Homo sapiens mandible scanned by synchrotro­n. CREDIT: ESRF / ISRAEL QAFZEH
Early Homo sapiens mandible scanned by synchrotro­n. CREDIT: ESRF / ISRAEL QAFZEH
 ?? CREDIT: ESRF / P JAYET ?? The team of scientists at the European Synchrotro­n Radiation Facility in Grenoble, France, ready to scan the Halszkarap­tor escuilliei fossil. From left to right: Pascal Godefroit, Vincent Beyrand, Dennis Voeten, Paul Tafforeau, Vincent Fernandez, Andrea Cau.
CREDIT: ESRF / P JAYET The team of scientists at the European Synchrotro­n Radiation Facility in Grenoble, France, ready to scan the Halszkarap­tor escuilliei fossil. From left to right: Pascal Godefroit, Vincent Beyrand, Dennis Voeten, Paul Tafforeau, Vincent Fernandez, Andrea Cau.
 ?? CREDIT: ROYAL BELGIAN INSTITUTE OF NATURAL SCIENCES; SAINT THOMAS PRODUCTION ?? The Synchrotro­n allowed a 3D render of Halszkarap­tor escuilliei to explore, leading to a greater understand­ing of its structure and habits while keeping the fossil undamaged.
CREDIT: ROYAL BELGIAN INSTITUTE OF NATURAL SCIENCES; SAINT THOMAS PRODUCTION The Synchrotro­n allowed a 3D render of Halszkarap­tor escuilliei to explore, leading to a greater understand­ing of its structure and habits while keeping the fossil undamaged.
 ??  ??
 ?? ILLUSTRATI­ON: SHAWNEE WILLIS ?? Synchrotro­ns produce high-energy X-rays, generally with wavelength­s in the 0.10–0.01 nm range, or energies in the 10–120 keV range. The high energy X-rays penetrate deeper into matter than X-rays with energies below 10 keV. An upgrade at the ESRF will allow larger specimens and Egyptian mummies to be scanned using this cuttung edge technology.
ILLUSTRATI­ON: SHAWNEE WILLIS Synchrotro­ns produce high-energy X-rays, generally with wavelength­s in the 0.10–0.01 nm range, or energies in the 10–120 keV range. The high energy X-rays penetrate deeper into matter than X-rays with energies below 10 keV. An upgrade at the ESRF will allow larger specimens and Egyptian mummies to be scanned using this cuttung edge technology.
 ?? CREDIT: PNAS ?? A synchrotro­n scan (above, left) of a Neandertha­l child’s maxilla highlights the permanent teeth: central incisors in light blue, lateral incisors in yellow, canines in pink and third premolars in green. The deciduous (‘baby’) teeth are grey. Cross-section slices, top right, show the extent of enamel developmen­t. The neonatal line revealed in a first molar’s dentine tip, bottom right, suggests that the tooth part began forming about 17 days before the child’s birth.
CREDIT: PNAS A synchrotro­n scan (above, left) of a Neandertha­l child’s maxilla highlights the permanent teeth: central incisors in light blue, lateral incisors in yellow, canines in pink and third premolars in green. The deciduous (‘baby’) teeth are grey. Cross-section slices, top right, show the extent of enamel developmen­t. The neonatal line revealed in a first molar’s dentine tip, bottom right, suggests that the tooth part began forming about 17 days before the child’s birth.
 ??  ??
 ?? CREDIT: ESRF ?? Synchrotro­n X-rays allowed researcher­s to identify difference­s in the vein structure of Cretaceous-period damselflie­s encased in Burmese amber, leading to two new species: Burmahemip­hlebia zhangi and Palaeodysa­grion cretacicus.
CREDIT: ESRF Synchrotro­n X-rays allowed researcher­s to identify difference­s in the vein structure of Cretaceous-period damselflie­s encased in Burmese amber, leading to two new species: Burmahemip­hlebia zhangi and Palaeodysa­grion cretacicus.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia