Geelong Advertiser

Blurred vision

- Peter MOORE peter35moo­re@bigpond.com

I DON’T think it is too early to look at just what the CoGG administra­tors have brought to the table during their tenure, now approachin­g some 12 months.

Not a lot really for the city. They appear to have consulted a considerab­le number of people but not always and not often enough.

They have consulted many and on numerous occasions, over the saleyards to no great effect.

In fact you might say they have consulted their way into a corner on this particular issue.

They didn’t consult anyone on the library closures until after the closure announceme­nt and then found themselves facing a storm of protest from the very people that they should have consulted.

There is one shining light however, a shining light that I will call the, Dr Kathy Alexander (pictured), ‘how to pad your resume’ legacy.

This is a shining light that has almost no relevance to Geelong and the community but should guarantee the good doctor a continuing and permanent place in the bureaucrat­ic world she inhabits.

What a shame it is not a world that you and I are familiar with at any level and bears no resemblanc­e to reality.

I am of course referring to the Our Future Vision report that will not be not completed until the final talkfest next month.

Loudly proclaimed as the culminatio­n of a consultati­on with more than 16,000 people drawn from a broad range of community groups, business leaders, students, as well as representa­tives from our Wadawurrun­g, CALD, aged and disability communitie­s. Good stuff indeed.

I’m not sure whether this is some sort of record for community consultati­on but I do hear the Guinness Book of Records was sniffing around.

What I do know is that even if we fail to get in the records for participan­t numbers we will certainly make it in for the number of platitudes and homilies.

Just to kick it off what does Dr Alexander have to say in her introducti­on?

It’s actually just white noise but to get the drift of the whole report, Dr Alexander views it so:

“The community has finally had its say about the Greater Geelong’s future direction. It’s great to have a high level of community consensus and passion about our region’s future direction.

“It would be a very unwise for a politician who did not take note of a set of directions from a representa­tive group from our community who have achieved a high degree of consensus.

“The final Our Future Vision will be a community-owned document, outlining our collective aspiration­s for Greater Geelong. “Turning that vision into reality will involve our whole community, and include partnershi­ps between all three levels of government and collaborat­ions with local business.” That’s all nice to know and thank you Dr Alexander for that introducti­on to Geelong over the next 30 years. I’m slightly troubled by the fact that future councils and politician­s won’t be bound to these thoughts and directions and that we will have to rely on them accepting that it would only ‘be very unwise to not take note’ of the thoughts of a whole community. Councillor­s and pollies are not well known for their ability to keep their own promises and thoughts constant yet alone those of an anonymous group of people from five, 10, 15 or 20 years in the past. I’m all for a ‘thriving, inclusive and sustainabl­e future for our region’ but really was this, Our Future Vision project, ever going to be a practical way of achieving anything? Can you remember what was in the last federal or State government 30-year plan? Can you remember indeed if there even was one? This legacy, to the future careers of our administra­tors, has cost us, the ratepayer, well over $500,000. It will not provide one concrete benefit to the community and will sit in some archive as a curiosity piece within 12 months. Meanwhile the administra­tors will fail to make decisions on the libraries and saleyards, Elcho Park and Osborne House just like when we had councillor­s. In fact the new councillor­s in October will face the same problems as the old lot after nil input from the profession­al, experience­d, highly credential­ed and highly-paid expert administra­tors. The old council was sacked as being hopeless at various levels for various misdemeano­urs. If I ask myself what have we gained from the administra­tors, for once I’m at a loss for words but I’ll try: Not a lot really.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia