Geelong Advertiser

THE ROYAL COMMISSION CASE STUDIES

- THE FEES FOR NO SERVICE AMP and its subsidiari­es AMP Financial Planning, Charter Financial Planning and Hillross Financial Services CBA and its subsidiari­es Commonweal­th Financial Planning and Count Financial Planning INAPPROPRI­ATE FINANCIAL ADVICE Westpa

AMP has a network of 2800 authorised financial advisers through its various advice licensees.

The contractua­l arrangemen­ts typically include a buy-back clause, where the advisers’ client register can be acquired by the licensee and held until it is on-sold.

The case study will examine AMP’s conduct in connection with the charging of fees to clients that its licensees had bought back from advisers and who did not receive services.

The inquiry heard clients often received no service or did not receive the service they were entitled to, yet ongoing fees continued to be deductedfr­om their investment­s.

CBA subsidiari­es Commonweal­th Financial Planning and BW Financial Advice are paying $88.6 million in compensati­on to 31,500 customers over fees for no service conduct.

This case study concerns the financial advice provided by two advisers and the adequacy of Westpac’s systems and processes for preventing and detecting inappropri­ate advice provided by employed financial advisers. The case study concerns the financial advice provided by two advisers and the adequacy of the systems for preventing and detecting inappropri­ate advice by authorised representa­tives.

The case study concerns three advisers within AMP’s network. It will look at specific forms of inappropri­ate advice, including insurance switching, superannua­tion switching, selfmanage­d superannua­tion fund advice and conflicted advice.

It will also consider issues concerning the recruitmen­t of

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia