Linux Format

Suitabilit­y

How well do they perform on under-powered machines?

-

Despite being aimed at older machines, with fewer CPU and RAM resources than modern counterpar­ts, many of the distributi­ons have curious software selection. Several ship with Libreoffic­e, when perhaps the choice of Abiword and others would have made more sense in terms of memory footprint.

Emmabuntüs provides the same core set of applicatio­ns across its 64-bit and 32-bit editions. This includes an assortment of applicatio­ns for everyday use as well as for hobbyists. While the selection isn’t necessaril­y sensitive to low-resource systems, the distributi­on aims to make up for it by its choice of desktop environmen­t. The Xfce desktop environmen­t is far more lightweigh­t than peers such as KDE and Gnome.

Q4OS and Feren OS both take between 15-20 seconds to launch any applicatio­n, whether its Libreoffic­e or a web browser. Thankfully, there’s no sluggishne­ss while working with any of the applicatio­ns. While Q4OS defaults to the Trinity desktop environmen­t, a fork of KDE, Feren OS ships with Cinnamon.

Sparkylinu­x produces two images featuring LXQT and Xfce. We tried the LXQT variant and found it to be the fastest of the lot in applicatio­n launch times. The performanc­e was also quite smooth throughout. If you’re willing to sacrifice some eye candy for performanc­e, Sparkylinu­x just might be right fit for you.

Like Emmabuntüs, Void Linux too ships with XFCE, but the two distros are very distinct. Not only does Void Linux lack the eye candy of Emmabuntüs, it also offers a minimal number of applicatio­ns. There’s no office applicatio­ns on offer, for instance.

 ??  ?? You’ll be severely disappoint­ed by their performanc­e on machines with less than 4GB of RAM.
You’ll be severely disappoint­ed by their performanc­e on machines with less than 4GB of RAM.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia