Fishing advice group axed

Concerns over super trawler scrutiny

A FURORE has erupted after the scrapping of a troubled super trawler advisory group, reigniting controversy over the Australian Fisheries Management Authority’s handling of the small pelagic fishery.

In a statement posted on its website, the authority said the group had completed its set term on June 30.

Two of the group’s members yesterday accused the authority of trying to reduce public scrutiny of the fishery.

Jon Bryan, of the Tasmanian Conservation Trust, said he believed the committee had been disbanded to remove dissenters and reduce public scrutiny.

Recreational fishing voice Graham Pike said he and Mr Bryan had pointed out conflicts of interest and other issues but had been ignored.

A conflict-of-interest controversy over trawler operator Seafish Tasmania having its head, Gerry Geen, in the group had led to its chairwoman Kirsten Davies quitting.

She left in January after her concern a “perpetual state of pecuniary conflict” in the group was ignored by the authority, it was revealed in June.

A number of other controversies around the authority and the group continued to simmer after mass protests against super trawlers working the vast fishery.

“AFMA is taking the opportunity to review how the independent AFMA Commission receives scientific advice regarding the [small pelagic fishery] and how stakeholders are engaged in that process,” the statement said.

“Given the

high

level

of stakeholder interest in the science of the [fishery], AFMA is considering what options are available to ensure that stakeholders’ views about SPF science are captured.”

Mr Geen declined to comment.

Seafish Tasmania said the fishery’s total allowable catch, as set by the authority, was sustainable.

Senator Richard Colbeck yesterday said he understood a decision would be made next month about how the authority would proceed.

“The advisory process will continue to provide fishery stakeholders with the opportunity to have their say about the science, including stakeholders from the commercial fishing industry, conservation groups, recreational fishing interests and science bodies,” he said.