Mercury (Hobart)

Culture destroyed while debate rages

- Tim Sauer Sandy Bay Paddy Dorney Lower Sandy Bay

SOME 15 years ago I was assisting the officers of the Department of Heritage in identifyin­g all the Tasmanian works of the nationally significan­t architect Esmond Dorney. The purpose was to place them on the Heritage Register. Changes within Heritage Tasmania since have left this process incomplete.

While at the moment there is much debate about the removal of listings from the register, there are buildings, of particular significan­ce to our state and national architectu­ral heritage, which, as we argue, are being demolished or destroyed by ill-considered renovation because of a hiatus in new listings. This especially relates to 20th century archi- tecture, which is, disturbing­ly, sparsely represente­d on the register.

Driving through Lindisfarn­e on Friday I noticed to my great concern that recent alteration­s to the old Motel Jason had destroyed the previous Esmond Dorney facade.

Over the past few years I have seen too many J.H.E. Dorney buildings thoughtles­sly destroyed without due considerat­ion of their state and national significan­ce. Though some of his work is listed, it is by no means a comprehens­ive coverage of the Tasmanian work. This cultural devastatio­n continues while we fiddle about and argue about delistings.

For future generation­s of Australian­s it is important that we recognise that 20th Century Modernism is of equal importance to earlier eras of built heritage. The opportunit­y to conserve its most important elements is passing us by.

A similar attitude saw far too much of our historic heritage destroyed last century.

Even cultural treasures such as Salamanca and Battery Point were nearly lost in a period demonstrat­ing a comparable lack of breadth of cultural vision. We must identify relevant priorities to prevent such cultural vandalism occurring again under our watch.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia