Mercury (Hobart)

TASSIE POLITICIAN­S STATE THEIR VIEWS

-

A MAJORITY of Tasmanian federal politician­s are unlikely to be swayed by the outcome of the Federal Government’s proposed $122 million postal plebiscite on same-sex marriage.

The Mercury asked all 17 federal representa­tives how they would act in the wake of the plebiscite, slated to be held between September to November 7.

The Plan B postal plebiscite comes after the Government failed in the Senate to reopen debate on the compulsory plebiscite — which had previously been defeated in November last year.

Independen­t senator Jacqui Lambie, who is not a supporter of same-sex marriage, said she would neverthele­ss support the majority outcome for Tasmania. “I won’t be campaignin­g for either side. My job as a representa­tive isn’t to change your views but to hear them,” she said.

Liberal senator Jonathan Duniam (left) said: “The parliament should obey the will of the people and I intend to do the same. I encourage all Australian­s to participat­e in the vote and express their view.”

Liberal senator Eric Abetz said he would be “guided” by the electors of Tasmania in any parliament­ary vote. “It is impossible to determine whether a parliament­arian should adhere to their electorate, their state or to the national vote and in those circumstan­ces all parliament­arians should be given a degree of leeway to adhere to how they can best represent those who elected them,” he said.

But Greens senator Nick McKim (right) said: “I will be taking no notice whatsoever of the plebiscite result and will be voting for marriage equality, as I always have, because it’s the right thing to do.”

Fellow Green Peter WhishWilso­n said he would vote for marriage equality in the Senate because parliament­arians needed to end discrimina­tion of any kind. Mitchell Brian Justine Keay (right) also indicated that she was unlikely to be bound by a no vote if it happened. “A voluntary, nonbinding, postal vote is a total cop-out. This is totally unnecessar­y and a total waste of time and money,” she said.

Franklin Labor MP Julie Collins said:“I will vote in the House in the same way I did last time — in support of marriage equality.”

Denison independen­t MP Andrew Wilkie said: “I’m hopeful that the High Court challenge will succeed, in which case how I would respond to a postal vote is irrelevant.”

Bass Labor MP Ross Hart said:” I will support marriage equality in every forum, while respecting that there is a diversity of views.”

Labor senator Anne Urquhart said:” Why would we be bound by a voluntary, non-binding, postal vote? ... I will always vote in support of marriage equality.”

Labor senator Carol Brown said: “We should have a free vote [in parliament] right now. I have always supported marriage equality and I always will.”

Labor senator Catryna Bilyk said: “My support for marriage equality is based on the right of same-sex couples to have equal recognitio­n of their relationsh­ips.” Labor senator Lisa Singh said she would always support the right for same-sex couples to marry.

Labor senator Helen Polley, Bushby Stephen Parry David

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia