Mercury (Hobart)

Racing profits don’t tell real story

Despite recent gains, the industry cannot be sustained under the Liberals’ current policy,

- writes Andrew Scanlon

PRESS coverage of the Tasmanian racing industry recently has demonstrat­ed the wide gap between the views of the grassroots participan­ts and those responsibl­e for developing the policies for their future in a sustainabl­e industry.

Joe O’Neill, a major horse racing syndicator, has said his reasons for reducing his involvemen­t in Tasmania include the poor level of stakes on offer relative to other states.

Scott Brunton, the state’s leading thoroughbr­ed trainer, indicated he was considerin­g moving to South Australia because of the poor state of racetracks, particular­ly at Elwick.

In 2016 the major racing clubs incorporat­ed a new organisati­on, Racing Clubs Tasmania (RCT), the first cross-code body in Australia.

RCT’s objective is to get a new business model for the funding of racing in this state.

Last Friday the minister for racing announced that Tasracing had made a profit of $371,000 in 2016-17 and this would facilitate a stakes increase across all codes of 4 per cent in 2017-18.

This result follows a profit of $180,000, and he said this was evidence that Tasracing was now operating on a sustainabl­e financial basis. However, to achieve these very modest profits the minister approved a 13 per cent cut to stakes in 2015 of $3 million. The industry has good reason to be bitter about this situation given that before the 2014 election the Liberal Party promised it would boost stakes across all three racing codes as a priority. In doing so it acknowledg­ed publicly what everyone in the industry knows, stakes money is the key to driving growth in the industry.

To cut stakes by 13 per cent the minister amended a funding deed put in place in 2009 by the then government of Tasmania to obtain the industry’s agreement to the sale of TOTE Tasmania. The key commitment in this document was that stakes were to be maintained in real terms for 20 years at the level paid out in the 2008-09 financial year. Had this undertakin­g been adhered to the racing industry would have received to the end of 2015-16 an additional $5 million on top of the $3 million cut made by the minister.

The current aspiration­al objective in the Tasracing corporate plan is to increase stakes by 4 per cent annually, however this is comprised of an inflation component of up to 2 per cent (which only maintains their now real value) and up to a further 2 per cent based on Tasracing’s financial performanc­e which, as noted, is only marginally profitable.

RCT wants a commitment from the next government to restore to the funding deed the commitment to maintain the real value of stakes and in a way that removes future exposure of the industry to sovereign risk.

Another promise made to the racing industry removed by the current government is that funding of $43 million was to be provided for future capital investment across all three codes. The task of funding this shortfall is now left to Tasracing, which lacks the financial capacity to service any additional debt. For example, Tasracing can only upgrade Elwick from internally generated funds which, at the end of 2015-16, totalled some $12 million.

This is barely enough to refurbish the main track let alone the two tracks to a status befitting a capital city. This situation raises the question of how any significan­t future capital expenditur­e for tracks and facilities for all codes will be funded.

Another outcome from cutting stakes is that local breeding is not producing sufficient foals to maintain the number of horses needed each racing season; the gap is 50 per cent for harness and 20 per cent for thoroughbr­eds. The greyhound code is little better off with restrictio­ns now on the number of pups produced annually. The inevitable outcome of the Government ignoring this situation is that smaller and poorer quality race fields will ultimately impact on Tasracing’s revenue from wagering operators.

RCT wants a new business model to restore the industry to a growth path without seeking access to additional funding from the state budget. In this context in 2000 the then government removed all wagering taxation from TOTE Tasmania on the basis that the revenue foregone by the state budget would flow directly to the racing industry as stakes and increase its impact on the state’s economy. Tatts continues to enjoy this taxfree status in Tasmania even though the company pays wagering taxation in Queensland and makes a direct payment in lieu of this to the industry in South Australia. RCT estimates this tax-free status benefits interstate shareholde­rs by some $4 million a year at the expense of Tasmanian racing.

For this reason RCT considers that a point-ofconsumpt­ion tax, as now applies in South Australia and soon to be introduced into Western Australia, should be introduced on all wagering originated out of Tasmania. RCT understand­s that if the merger of Tatts with Tabcorp takes place, Tabcorp has indicated publicly it is prepared to pay a point-ofconsumpt­ion tax.

Alternativ­ely an equivalent amount should be recovered by reintroduc­ing a wagering tax. There is no justificat­ion to continue to improve the financial return to interstate shareholde­rs while the local

racing industry struggles to survive.

RCT also considers that Tasracing’s cost of running the racing industry at some $20 million a year over and above stakes is excessive and needs to be reviewed. Further, given its poor financial performanc­e and lack of capacity to fund capital works its continued operation as a state-owned enterprise is questionab­le.

Discussion­s with the Labor Party indicate it understand­s the reasons for the poor outlook for the future of the racing industry and has proposed policies to address the key issues raised above. In contrast the Liberal Party continues to ask industry participan­ts to accept that because Tasracing has made two modest profits off the back of cutting stakes by 13 per cent that the industry is now on a sustainabl­e footing going forward. The Liberal Party should reconsider its position and commit to policies that will provide real sustainabi­lity for the racing industry. Andrew Scanlon is the chairman of Racing Clubs Tasmania.

 ??  ??
 ?? Picture: LUKE BOWDEN ?? ALL BETS ARE OFF: Without serious changes, the future of racing in Tasmania is unclear.
Picture: LUKE BOWDEN ALL BETS ARE OFF: Without serious changes, the future of racing in Tasmania is unclear.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia