Steamed up on pokies
I RARELY get cranky, but when I read “Pokies only likely to fall slightly”, the pathetic report from the inquiry into gaming machines in Tasmania has me steamed up ( Mercury, September 29). Taxpayers have footed the bill for this long inquiry, yet its recommendations leave me suspicious that powerful influences are at work behind the scenes. Treasurer Peter Gutwein says the Government should not be buying out pokies. The operators always knew the end date of their licences, and non-renewal does not require compensation.
The evidence shows shutting down some pubs and clubs would advantage the industry, not to mention the community as a whole, When poker machines were introduced, Tasmanians were promised they would only be permitted in casinos. Now we are lumped with an expensive report whose design appears to be to support continuation of the harm that pokies have inflicted and to continue to pile up profits for a few interstate beneficiaries. I expect better from those who govern us.
Stakes cuts hurt
MR Rockliff, I hope those affected by your “tough love for racing” remember your words at the next election. The farmers who produce the hay for the horses, the barrier attendants, jockeys, trainers, hospitality staff and cleaners are all on their knees. They have families to feed, clothe and educate. And you are the minister for agriculture, racing and education. Stakes money cuts mean fewer horses racing. Trainers who are being forced to walk away from the industry or even worse leave the state.
While breeders can sell their horses to mainlanders, little money is made once stallion fees are taken into account, and Tasracing tell us that the Magic Millions sales are a success. Our three main tracks are a shambles. As one jockey mentioned to me, “they are unprofessional.” Tasra- SPOTLIGHT: Miss Audrey Ken clay pigeon shooting at Quilpie, Queensland in 1949. cing has done no significant maintenance for over two years. The only ones making money are Tasracing and the Government. We ask for accountability and transparency of this government department. fending the law as it stands, surely no thinking person can really believe our politicians’ promises that freedom of speech won’t be diminished if those trying to silence all opposition prevail and the law is changed. Clearly, the only safe option is to vote No.