Mercury (Hobart)

Take the sting out of food scams

Fake honey is just one of the products of an internatio­nal trade in counterfei­t that must stop at the border, says Jan Davis

- Jan Davis is an agribusine­ss consultant and former chief executive of the Tasmanian Farmers and Graziers Associatio­n.

TESTING at a leading internatio­nal scientific lab that specialise­s in honey fraud detection last month found that almost half the honey samples selected from supermarke­t shelves were “adulterate­d”. This means they have been mixed with something other than nectar from bees.

Experts report that adulterate­d honey generally included rice syrup and beet syrup, as well as other unidentifi­ed substances, which aren’t detected by official honey tests.

Internatio­nal fraudsters, often criminal gangs in China, produce the fake honey and sell it to unsuspecti­ng suppliers at a higher price, making a fortune along the way.

The adulterate­d samples were all products that blended local and imported honey.

Phil McCabe, the president of the Internatio­nal Federation of Beekeepers’ Associatio­n, said adulterate­d honey isn’t honey at all.

“Everything about it seems to be honey when in fact it’s just sugar syrup or something else … Consumers don’t realise what they are buying and eating isn’t honey,” he said. And he’s right. When we buy food, we take it on faith that the product matches the label. These revelation­s about adulterate­d honey products have left many questionin­g this trust.

Counterfei­ting by low-cost producers in Third World markets has been a challenge to many major corporatio­ns and fashion houses for decades.

However, fashion goods are not the only targets for brand cheats.

Over recent years, food fraud has become increasing­ly commonplac­e. Because it is designed to be undetected, it is difficult to know the true reach of food fraud, but there is no doubt it is a lucrative practice.

Food fraud is essentiall­y the sale of an inferior product represente­d as a more valuable one. This could be through substituti­on, dilution, tampering, or misreprese­ntation of food, ingredient­s or packaging.

Australia enjoys positive perception­s in rapidly growing Asian markets as a clean and green producer of wholesome, natural and trustworth­y food products.

The upside of this means there are opportunit­ies in export markets for Australian farmers and food producers to take advantage of strong demand for our products and, in many cases, to achieve a significan­t price premium.

The downside is that unscrupulo­us traders want to cash in on these opportunit­ies by muscling in with copies of many of our well-known brands.

High-value and highdemand foods are particular­ly at risk of counterfei­ting. Brands known for quality may be targeted with fake labelling and branding.

Certain labels like organic and free-range that attract a premium price are also popular targets. However, origins can be difficult to trace, resulting in fraudulent use of these labels.

We’re all familiar with food fraud that takes the form of passing off one product as something more up-market. For years, Nile perch has been passed off as Australian barramundi, generic green leaves have been marketed as oregano, and prawns from Thailand and Vietnam have been sold as local product. This can also include deliberate fake country of origin informatio­n — for example, labelling snow peas from Nigeria as locally grown.

This is wrong on so many counts.

Calling out cheats is not just about protecting reputation­s and profits. As importantl­y, it is about maintainin­g brand integrity, and ensuring food health and safety.

The ramificati­ons if someone got sick or died from a counterfei­t product would be huge.

No doubt those affected would sue, and regulators would come down on the legitimate producer like a ton of bricks. Even if they could prove the offending products

were fakes, bad publicity could destroy them.

Australian consumers have a right to be able to tell at a glance the origin of their food and where it has been processed. And we need to be able to rely on transparen­t and simple labelling to help us make informed choices.

Imitation may well be said to be the sincerest form of flattery.

However, when it comes to our fabulous Aussie food products, it is simply theft. We need to take every possible measure to ensure that our brands, and our producers, are strongly protected from opportunis­ts trying to cash in on their hard work and investment.

You can’t buy a car in Australia that doesn’t meet Australian safety standards, you can’t buy a microwave oven in Australia that doesn’t meet Australian safety standards, you can’t buy children’s clothing that doesn’t meet Australian safety standards. Why then can we buy food that doesn’t meet Australian safety standards?

We should be making it clear to our government­s that we expect them to insist on the highest possible health and safety standards for food, as they do for other products.

Fraudsters, often criminal gangs in China, produce the fake honey and sell it to unsuspecti­ng suppliers at a higher price ... High-value foods are particular­ly at risk, organic and free-range are popular targets

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia