Mercury (Hobart)

‘Witness X’ won’t testify at Rush trial

- MATTHEW BENNS and LUCY HUGHES JONES

A JUDGE has ruled “important” evidence from a mystery witness alleging inappropri­ate behaviour of a sexual nature by Geoffrey Rush will not be heard in the Hollywood star’s defamation trial.

While Justice Michael Wigney rejected the new material, he said if Witness X wants to make her allegation­s public through the media “she should be free to do so”. He told the Federal Court the new allegation­s occurred during a theatre production “many years” earlier and “could broadly be said to be sexual in nature”.

Mr Rush, 67, is suing The Daily Telegraph over a series of 2017 articles which reported that a young actress had lodged a complaint with the Sydney Theatre Company over his alleged “inappropri­ate behaviour” during a production of King Lear in 2015 and 2016. The actress was later named as Eryn Jean Norvill, who played Mr Rush’s daughter Cordelia in the STC production.

Justice Wigney said the new evidence did not involve or prove any of the allegation­s involving Ms Norvill.

But he added: “The evidence of Witness X would, if accepted, be capable of establishi­ng the substantia­l truth of the general imputation­s that Mr Rush had engaged in scandalous­ly inappropri­ate behaviour in the theatre.” The judge ruled the new evidence could not be admitted because of the toll any delay would take on Mr Rush.

Witness X’s evidence would have to be given from overseas by videolink. It would also mean Mr Rush would be called back to give further evidence when the trial resumed in April 2019.

Justice Wigney said the incidents alleged by Witness X did not occur during performanc­e or rehearsals but in social settings and once in a pro- fessional context in the theatre. “Some of the incidents involved electronic messages,” he said.

He told the court Witness X’s allegation­s did not relate directly to the production of King Lear but were “capable” of supporting claims including that Mr Rush had behaved in a sexually inappropri­ate manner in the theatre.

Ms Norvill earlier told the court she had felt “trapped” as Mr Rush “slowly” and “deliberate­ly” ran his fingers over her breast as she played dead on stage.

He denies any wrongdoing and claims two front-page articles in the paper about the alleged incident painted him as a “pervert” and “sexual predator”. The newspaper argues the stories published on November 30 and December 1 last year draw on allegation­s made by Ms Norvill and are true.

The hearing continues, with closing submission­s slated to begin today.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia