Mercury (Hobart)

Work towards a healthy future

- Wendy Armstrong White Beach Helen Polley Labor senator for Tasmania Alan Leitch Austins Ferry Roen Meijers Transformi­ng Tasmania Shane Smith Sandy Bay

IF I worked for one of the fish farms to support my family and was getting my informatio­n about the sustainabi­lity of the industry from my employer, I would probably have a different perspectiv­e on fish farming in Tasmania. I have the privilege of being able to look at the issues through different eyes. My main wish is for a healthy future for us all. In my mind, this requires us all to care for our environmen­t, as well as caring for each other and ensuring everyone has a roof over their heads and food on the table. Whilst I want my kids and grandchild­ren to be able to support themselves, I want them to understand the meaning of “do no harm” and to be able to choose work that makes things better, rather than unwittingl­y making them worse. I don’t want them to feel cornered into a future-eating job.

I feel very angry when our government encourages community division by framing all our industries as “jobs versus the environmen­t’. It’s a clever strategy but ignores the impacts many industries inflict on our environmen­t and it splits our communitie­s. I believe our government should be providing big-picture leadership that helps restore our damaged ecosystems, legislatin­g to prevent further damage and supporting initiative­s that work towards a healthy future.

Distilling controvers­y

GREG French, Rob Sloane and others have eloquently summed up that the controvers­y about the Lake Malbena proposal distils down to the new intrusion into the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area by helicopter­s. The only thing I could add is to emphasise the limited understand­ing of politician­s and tourism people when it comes to these special areas. After carrying a pack for hours to your favourite lake, to sit down and reflect on the peace and solitude and then to have it shattered by a helicopter flying overhead would be devastatin­g.

For those who have not enjoyed the wilderness experience, let me put it this way. If you are of religious persuasion and are sitting reflective­ly in your church pew and a drone was let loose in the church, how would you feel? I believe that is a realistic comparison. teachers but they can’t because they don’t know where their funding will come from. Investment in early education is one of the smartest investment­s we can make. Under Labor’s new National Preschool and Kindy Program every three and four-yearold will have access to the quality early education they need for the best start in life. Under a Shorten Labor Government more than 13,000 Tasmanian children will have greater access to early education, and from 2021, every three-year-old in Tasmania will be able to access 15 hours of subsidised early childhood education.

Gender crisis

I NEVER thought I would say this but for once I agree with Jacqui Lambie. The push to have gender removed from birth certificat­es is ridiculous and vote-chasing. When a baby is born, it is probably years before there is any hint of gender crisis. The baby is male or female and should be identified as such. In this day and age of trendy names it could happen that without gender noted on the certificat­e, the name could identify the baby as maybe male, maybe female. Another case of political correctnes­s gone mad.

Reducing discrimina­tion

THE gender reforms being proposed were initiated by Transformi­ng Tasmania and have our full support. This includes allowing parents the choice to have gender appear on their child’s birth certificat­e if they wish, as well as allowing adults to remove gender from their own birth certificat­es. This will help reduce the discrimina­tion that occurs because gender identity doesn’t match what is recorded on official documents. It will remove unnecessar­y government interferen­ce from the lives of transgende­r and gender-diverse people. There has been a lot of misinforma­tion about the reforms, but the most persistent myth is that these reforms require more consultati­on. The Tasmanian Anti-Discrimina­tion Commission conducted extensive consultati­on in 2016. Any further consultati­on would be an unnecessar­y and harmful delay that impacts most on vulnerable young people. Last year’s postal survey returned a resounding Yes vote in Tasmania, despite fearmonger­ing by the No case which was, in large part, about transgende­r issues. We believe the Yes vote is a mandate for removing the last vestiges of discrimina­tion against transgende­r and gender-diverse people without further delay.

Footbridge planning

FOR something that has been years in the planning it is a pretty poor effort from contractor­s Fulton Hogan not to be able to finish the memorial footbridge linking the Cenotaph to the World War I soldiers’ memorial walk on the Queen’s Domain in time for such a significan­t occasion as the 100th anniversar­y of the First World War’s Armistice. This was a once-in-alifetime opportunit­y to recognise such a symbolic event that had the hope of worldwide peace. The fact the contractor­s didn’t build some contingenc­y time into the constructi­on timeline is essentiall­y bad planning. A long time to wait for the next centenary.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia