Mercury (Hobart)

Take note of complicati­ons

GENDER REFORMS

- Harry Quick Berriedale Eric Lockett Rose Bay — David Norm Adamczewsk­i New Town Robert Rodway East Risdon Roly Trustum Claremont Andrew Gloudemans Mount Seymour Lynn Giddings Pontville Gordon Thurlow Launceston Barry Ryan Glenorchy

BRONWYN Williams’s considered and logical article raises serious concerns about the complicati­ons arising from the new Marriage Act amendments passed by the House of Assembly (“Careful scrutiny needed before radical reforms,” Talking Point, November 22). It suggests that the maxim, extreme circumstan­ces make poor law, may be in the minds of the members of the Legislativ­e Council as they review the new reforms. they seem to have captured the media’s attention, far more important issues for families are being totally neglected. To assert, as the Speaker is now doing, that those who object to this issue being given such prominence are Right-wing Christians, shows how out of touch she really is.

Facts and feelings

LET’S hope our Legislativ­e Councillor­s are more discerning than Sue Hickey was when she fell for the spurious arguments for amendments on birth certificat­es. While transgende­r people and those experienci­ng gender dysphoria deserve our thoughtful considerat­ion, these amendments pander to false assumption­s: that facts don’t count if they conflict with feelings, that the wishes of a tiny minority have priority regardless of broader consequenc­es and that it is OK to have incomplete official records. And it is wrong of Ms Hickey to portray mainstream Christians, who made this country what it is and still comprise the majority of our population, as radical Right-wing extremists.

Different forms

AFTER the effort and cost involved in creating the legislativ­e changes and ongoing administra­tive burden in relation to birth certificat­es for people identifyin­g as transgende­r, I was surprised to see that in the 2016 Census, 1260 identified as transgende­r. This is about 0.0054 per cent of the population. The ABS acknowledg­es not everyone may choose to be identified, but Action call on population shift as Tasmania’s growth picks up pace The target number of 650,000 is hardly a bad thing. In fact it really should be more like approachin­g the 800,000 to 1 million point. With such growth there will be a desire for more private investment, better resourcing of public services and a place on the Australian map. if 10 per cent did so, this would mean a Tasmanian transgende­r population of 40 to 400. Given the size of this population, and potential for discrimina­tion affecting the wider population based on age, ethnicity, place of birth, etc, the issue could have been resolved by regulation.

An official form could be issued confirming an individual is an Australian born in Tasmania. A person would specify how much detail is to be included. As I understand current legislatio­n, gender and other informatio­n will be retained by government, so a regulatory change would not only address discrimina­tion for the transgende­r population, but the wider population. A more comprehens­ive form will be needed for a passport. A person could hold a range of forms to meet individual needs.

Nonsense

THE nonsense over gender reform is nothing more than a storm in a teacup. Hopefully it will cease so government can deal with more important outstandin­g issues.

Won the battle

SO, Sue Hickey crosses the floor of parliament to vote with Labor and the Greens to introduce genderless birth certificat­es to appease a few whilst off-siding the vast majority of the population. This has once again made Tasmania the laughing stock of Australia. You’ve won a battle, but you are surely doomed to lose the war.

Butt off

WITH so many smokers showing no regard in respect to disposal of their cigarette butts perhaps the best solution would be to remove them at the manufactur­er’s end. This would aid in protecting the environmen­t and could act as a deterrent to people wishing to smoke. With straws becoming a thing of the past, why not put butts on the list.

Keating model a goer

READER Judith Knowles urges caution in changing from a constituti­onal monarchy to a republic (Letters, November 21). She asks what will we replace it with. I suggest that Paul Keating’s model was the safest with a suitable set of checks and balances. An elected presidency guarantees an office for only the wealthy but not the wisest. Think the USA.

Extra billions for solar and wind

SOLAR and wind are cheap provided one doesn’t factor in the many, many billions needed to make it useful, that is, reliable, the many billions in lost investment (we have only a limited amount of wealth available) and the additional cost of caring for the increase in unemployed workers.

Quick water answer

IN response to TasWater, thank you for your quick attention to my query (Letters, November 23). Water rates all resolved, many thanks.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia