HALLS PASS
CONFIRMED Proposal sparked WHA change
A PROPOSAL for a luxury standing camp on Halls Island in Lake Malbena — within Tas- mania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area — led to the area being rezoned to allow for development, newly attained documents reveal.
The admission is revealed in emails released to the Mercury under Right to Information laws. The emails are between a State Government officer and federal bureaucrats preparing a 2016 briefing for then-environment minister Josh Frydenberg. In the communication, the DPIPWE officer confirms the World Heritage Area management plan “has been changed to allow for ... development of a luxury standing camp on Halls Island, Lake Malbena”.
A Government spokesman said it was no secret it would amend management plans to allow “innovative” proposals.
A PROPOSAL for a luxury standing camp on an island within the Wilderness World Heritage Area partly led to that area being rezoned to allow for development, newly released documents reveal.
Emails released to the Mercury under Right to Information laws show the State Government rezoned Halls Island in the Walls of Jerusalem National Park from “wilderness” to “self-reliant recreation” in 2016 — specifically because it had received a proposal for the helicopter-accessed tourism development on the Lake Malbena site.
Emails sent in late 2016 show the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment told its federal counterparts it had changed the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area management plan “to allow for development proposals submitted through [the State Government’s expressions of interest] process”.
All tourism proposals that benefited from the TWWHA boundary changes — except for Halls Island — were redacted in the documents given to the Mercury. The Government yesterday did not answer where else within the TWWHA had been rezoned.
An email sent last year from a DPIPWE staff member to employees within the depart- ment’s media team said the agency believed it was not appropriate to class Halls Island as wilderness because of a longstanding lease on the site and the presence of an existing historic hut.
“In addition, as the proposal had passed through the first stage of the [Government’s expressions of interest] process ... this was sufficient for the concept to be regarded as something that should be allowed for under the planning settings of the new TWWHA plan, noting that it would need to undergo an assessment,” the email said.
The Halls Island proposal was ultimately approved by the federal Environment Department last year — against the advice of national heritage and Aboriginal advisory bodies — partly because the area was zoned “self-reliant recreation” rather than “wilderness”.
Halls Island proponent Daniel Hackett said the emails suggested the rezoning had received the tick of approval from then-federal Environment Minister Josh Frydenberg and was therefore “correct and appropriate”.
“To paraphrase Bob Brown, ‘wilderness and huts is a nonsequitur’; it is contradiction to have wilderness, an existing hut, landscape modification and a long history of use occurring in the same location,” Mr Hackett said yesterday.
But Tasmanian Labor senator Anne Urquhart labelled the “circular process [of approval] comical”.
“The Commonwealth Government must urgently have a fresh look at the project and examine if actions are permissible within the wilderness zone,” Senator Urquart said.
The Wilderness Society, which is challenging the Federal Government’s process of approving the development in the Federal Court, called on the Premier and Parks, Tourism and Heritage Minister Will Hodgman to pause assessments under way through the Liberals’ expressions of interest process until the TWWHA tourism master plan was completed.
Wilderness Society acting state campaign manager Tom Allen said the “emails confirm that the Government secretly changed the rules for managing World Heritage wilderness”.
A Government spokesman said the Co-Ordinator General’s website had long displayed the “guiding principles” that parks and protected areas could be reclassified to allow for development.
“In inviting new and innovative ideas for sensible and appropriate developments in our National Parks, Reserves and Crown Land, the Government has stated that it may alter or amend relevant management plans if a proposal is able to demonstrate that it is an appropriate development for the site,” the Government spokesman said.
The federal Environment Department did not respond to request for comment.
The Central Highlands Council will vote on the Halls Island proposal next week.