Mercury (Hobart)

Time to break our addiction to failed ideology of prohibitio­n

MPs can help save lives if they vote to change drug policy this week, says Greg Barns

- Hobart barrister Greg Barns is a human rights lawyer, a legal adviser to Julian Assange and a former adviser to state and federal Liberal government­s. He is author of Rise of the Right: The war on Australia’s liberal values.

THIS week Tasmania’s legislator­s have an opportunit­y to say they value saving lives. The chance to do this comes in the form of a motion being moved in the Legislativ­e Council by one of its most eminent and intelligen­t members, Ruth Forrest, supporting pill testing.

One would have thought that other MPs would be clamouring over themselves to support Ms Forrest, but sadly when it comes to drugs policy an addiction to a failed ideology of prohibitio­n means rational evidence-based policies such as pill testing at music festivals is yet to see the light of day.

Already in the course of this current Parliament, politics and pig-headedness by Labor and the Liberals, with the notable exception of the one true liberal, Speaker Sue Hickey, has seen a Greens bill for saving lives through pill testing voted down.

Ms Forrest is giving the Parliament another chance to focus on the fact that use of pills at music festivals is not a police issue, but a health issue.

What Ms Forrest is reminding MPs of in her motion this week is that “pill testing is supported by national bodies including the Royal Australasi­an College of Physicians, the Royal Australian College of General Practition­ers, the Australasi­an College for Emergency Medicine, the Rural Doctors Associatio­n of Australia, the Australian Medical Associatio­n, the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation, the National Australian Pharmacy Students’ Associatio­n, the Pharmaceut­ical Society of Australia, the Ambulance Union State Council, the Public Health Associatio­n of Australia, Family Drug Support Australia, and the Australian Drug Law Reform Foundation and at the local level, by Tasmanian community organisati­ons including the Youth Network of Tasmania, the Tasmanian Aboriginal Centre and Community Legal Centres Tasmania.”

To this can be added the national progressiv­e lawyers group, the Australian Lawyers Alliance (disclaimer: this writer is a spokesman for the alliance nationally). And of course the former Australian Federal Police commission­er Mick Palmer. There are not many public health issues backed by such a wide array of groups and profession­al organisati­ons. But there is good reason for doing so.

In January this year two of Australia’s leading addiction and drug treatment doctors, the University of Melbourne’s Martin Lloyd-Jones and Paul Komesaroff from Monash University, set out in compelling terms why pill testing must become a reality in Australia. Writing on The Conversati­on on January 8 they argued that for many years: “Experts in the field of drug policy in Australia have known existing policies are failing. Crude messages (calls for total abstinence: ‘just say no to drugs’) and even cruder enforcemen­t strategies (harsher penalties, criminalis­ation of drug users) have had no impact on the use of drugs or the extent of their harmful effects on the community. Whether we like it or not, drug use is common in our society, especially among young people. In 2016 43 per cent of people aged 14 and older reported they had used an illicit drug at some point in their lifetime. And 28

per cent of people in their twenties said they had used illicit drugs in the past year,” they noted.

They also rightly observe that listening only to the police about drugs is in contrast to the way Australia once led on public safety.

“The rigid and inflexible attitudes of current policymake­rs contrast dramatical­ly with the innovative approaches to public health policy for which Australia was once renowned. Since the 1970s many highly successful campaigns have improved road safety, increased immunisati­on rates in children and helped prevent the spread of blood-borne virus infections,” Dr Lloyd-Jones and Professor Komesaroff write.

Remember the irrational fulminatin­g from some politician­s at the height of the AIDS crisis, telling people to abstain from having sex and opposing the installati­on of condom vending machines? Fortunatel­y that opposition was ignored, eventually.

How many more deaths at music festivals will it take for the same sort of attitude evident today to be ignored?

One would have thought the sanctity of life, a core natural law belief, would dictate that conservati­ve members of the Tasmanian Parliament supported pill testing. Or the supposed conservati­ve belief in pragmatic and sensible centrist approaches to issues.

When it comes to Labor, its previous opposition to the Greens bill was shameful. One of its MPs essentiall­y admitted to this columnist it opposed the bill for political reasons. But last week frontbench­er Alison Standen told the media Labor supported evidenceba­sed drug policies.

If she was being genuine, then she and her colleagues simply have to ask the exerts in this field and they will satisfy themselves that the evidence is well and truly on the side of pill testing.

And can politician­s please stop listening to Tasmania Police on pill testing? They are not health experts. They live in cloud cuckoo land when it comes to drugs although privately every police officer you speak with thinks the current “just say no” approach to drugs is a huge failure.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia