Mercury (Hobart)

A bully-free state means a crackdown

- Government must rein in state service use of social media, writes

MENTAL Health Minister Jeremy Rockliff is to be commended for vowing to make Tasmania a bully-free state, starting with his parliament­ary colleagues (“Let’s be nicer,” Mercury, July 26).

Recognisin­g that bullying, including cyber-bullying, is a workplace and a community issue, will the Minister and the Premier also vow to rid ministeria­l offices and the state service of bullying behaviour and actively encourage their associates in the community to do likewise?

The use of social media by

Rosemary Sandford

ministers, advisers and their colleagues in political, business and community arenas is now regarded as a primary means of communicat­ion with a wide range of stakeholde­rs. However, it can be open to abuse. We are all aware of instances of social media being used to denigrate and humiliate those with different points of view.

The Criminal Code Amendment (Bullying) Bill 2019, debated recently in State Parliament, should send the message that bullying, including cyber-bullying, is no joke. Under the Government’s proposed legislatio­n it will be a criminal offence.

Social media is one of the most influentia­l phenomena of the 21st century, as demonstrat­ed during this year’s federal election campaign. This campaign showcased some of the less edifying aspects of social media. Political candidates of dubious views and differing political persuasion­s were disendorse­d, although their names remained on the ballot paper.

Election campaigns are not the only sources of disrespect­ful and untrue comments perpetrate­d by those who wish to advance a particular, often selfintere­sted, point of view. Some community sources are equally guilty of using social media to divide rather than unite the community.

It appears that some social media sites purporting to be community sites may, in fact, be privately owned businesses. They are often “closed” sites and function like a private club. That is, they determine who can access the site and what is posted, or not. This ensures that only views that agree with those of the owners are allowed.

Local commentato­r and former Liberal party adviser, Greg Barns in Rise of the Right: The War on Australia’s Liberal Values and Turkish author Ece Temelkuran in her book How to Lose your Country: The 7 Steps from Democracy to Dictatorsh­ip, both comment on the influence of social media in the move to the Right of the political spectrum and the dangers this poses for contempora­ry democracy and civil society.

Tasmania will not escape unscathed. Examples of risks to our democracy include: delays up to three years in

obtaining informatio­n under the state’s Right to Informatio­n (RTI) legislatio­n; the lack of transparen­cy in statewide planning and fish farm approval processes; fasttracke­d land rezoning; and state government interventi­on in decision making with regard to favoured developmen­ts in national parks and irreplacea­ble public open spaces.

The Lake Malbena developmen­t and the kunanyi/ Mt Wellington cable car come to mind. For the Government to say it operates at armslength from such decisions via independen­t bodies is disingenuo­us, as many a public servant can attest.

The ploys of special legislatio­n and ministeria­l prerogativ­e to protect projects deemed by the political elite to be of “State Significan­ce” or similar, are actions more suited to an oligarchy than a democracy.

Tactics such as these are unworthy of a civil society where different beliefs, be they political, religious, racial, gender or environmen­tal, are respected.

The government of the day should strive to reflect and honour, not deride nor ignore, the values and wishes of its citizens. The tapestry of difference is what makes our state special for both residents and visitors.

Unfortunat­ely, in the tussle for the hearts and minds of Tasmanians, the State Government frequently uses the media, including social media, to advance messages of division, and to promote opportunit­ies and prosperity for a minority at the expense of an increasing number of disaffecte­d and disadvanta­ged Tasmanians.

Are Barns and Temelkuran on the mark? Are we at risk of losing our state?

Or, just perhaps, might Minister Rockliff’s commitment to make Tasmania a bully-free state and the Government’s antibullyi­ng legislatio­n, be the first steps in helping turn the tide towards a more civil and democratic Tasmania? Hobart’s Rosemary Sandford is a former ministeria­l adviser, public servant and academic.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia