Mercury (Hobart)

Is Australia a beacon to the world or just a racist country?

Ask almost any MP and you’ll get the same answer — but is it right, asks William Briggs

- Hobart’s Dr William Briggs is a political economist affiliated with Deakin University.

IS Australia a racist country? Are Australian­s racist? The questions crop up with unfortunat­e regularity. There is another question. How did Australia become a racist country? An accident of birth cannot be a reason for what has become an entrenched fear of the other, and yet there is a deeply rooted xenophobia in Australia. How did we get to this point? After all, waves of migration have marked the developmen­t of Australia since Europeans first arrived.

Ask almost any politician and you will be told Australia is a country made special because of its tolerance, its spirit of a fair go. We are told it shines as a beacon as the most successful multicultu­ral society on the planet. Many migrants found peace, security and home. For others, life was difficult. Australia has never been a benign, happy and blessed land. It can be a cruel and heartless place.

Australia shares with almost every other country a sense of nation, a call to nationalis­t sentiment in the cause of promoting unity and social cohesion. It is something carefully honed over decades and centuries. Taken to its illogical conclusion we could say Gina Rinehart, Frank Lowy, or someone working 10 hours a week and needing more, and the Newstart recipient share common values and aspiration­s because they are all Australian. It’s a nonsense and we all know it, but we have been told from birth we are egalitaria­n, and we are Australian­s, first, second and last. So why has this country had such a shameful history of racism? The answer is simple. Fear, xenophobia and racism became, very early, valuable tools by which to forge an artificial unity that became the Australian national identity.

The decades leading to Federation were spent fostering an emergent Australian nationalis­m. From the 1880s until well into the 20th century the Bulletin magazine had the infamous “Australia for the White Man” masthead. The trade unions and fledgling ALP were fierce advocates of white nationalis­m and racism. Echoes of this can still be heard with only ever-more slightly sophistica­ted fearmonger­ing about foreign workers. Conservati­ve parties since Federation have been no better.

Today in Australia there is a disturbing degree of antiAsian sentiment. It exists at all levels of society, from the likes of Clive Hamilton who has clothed racism in intellectu­al garb, to all sides of the political divide, to the overtly racist political movements and parties that seem to be proliferat­ing. The shameful attempt by the Monash University Students Union to effectivel­y ban internatio­nal students from running in student elections would have made those early Bulletin editors proud.

The anti-China racism is but the latest in a history of exclusion. Leaving aside institutio­nal anti-Aboriginal racism, the Chinese were the first to feel the force of bigotry and they are again the focus of racism that is both personal and state-sponsored. Australia has come a long way from the brutality of the goldfields, and it has been a journey marked

by constant waves of migration. Every wave of migration assisted the developmen­t of the Australian state. They came, they built, they developed. They created the infrastruc­ture and the wealth that comes from the work of many hands for the benefit of the few, and wave after wave suffered low and high-level racism, that came from being the ‘other’.

The intensity correlated with the health or otherwise of the economy. After WWII business and government called out to European migrants who were white enough to slip through the White Australia guidelines. They built factories, steel mills, dams and power stations. They contribute­d mightily to making this a wealthy country. This was the golden age of the world economy. These migrants learned to bear the brunt of the jibes and jokes. If you could “take a joke” you would be tolerated, if not embraced. The 1970s brought economic hard times. The good old days were never really to return. The next waves of migration, from Lebanon, from Vietnam, faced more difficult times. There was more than a little spite in the racism that greeted these arrivals. Manufactur­ing industries were beginning to leave Australia for greener, more lucrative pastures. Unemployme­nt was rising.

Fear and mistrust of our geographic place in the region and the world became politicall­y useful. Something was wrong. The good times were no longer rolling. It’s got to be someone’s fault. In timehonour­ed fashion it became the fault of the foreigner, the migrant, refugee, job stealer, the ones not quite like us.

Today one in 11 workers are underemplo­yed. Hundreds of thousands have no work. Recession looms. It’s just the right time for a good oldfashion­ed scapegoat. The foreign student, the asylumseek­er, those who “won’t accept our values” are all looked at with mistrust.

Australia is a racist country, but the Australian people are no more or less racist than any other. Racism serves a political purpose, but no good purpose. We have a lot more in common with each other than we might think. The wealth of this continent was created by us all. Let us not find divisions.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia