Mercury (Hobart)

Be clear with us, Premier

- Responsibi­lity for all editorial comment is taken by the Editor, Jenna Cairney, Level 1, 2 Salamanca Square, Hobart, TAS, 7000

FOR a man whose catchphras­e is “Let me be clear”, Tasmanian Premier Peter Gutwein’s press conference on Friday was murkier than the darkest depths of the Derwent River.

The Premier — who has been praised for his nononsense approach to the coronaviru­s crisis — started and ended the conference, as he always does, by saying his No.1 priority was the health and safety of Tasmanians.

Then after some interrogat­ion by reporters, who were rushed along by his media advisers, he skipped an important question by instead launching into a speech about how lucky we were in Tasmania to be able to ask questions about the likelihood of coronaviru­s infections arriving in the state rather than a daily death toll like they have in Victoria.

We are fortunate at present to be coronaviru­s free. That fact is undeniable.

But what is also undeniable is that the state government has not been transparen­t with Tasmanians.

We have implored the government to provide data or science to support its refusal to open to safe travel spots until December 1.

Then we find out that the Deputy Director of Public Health said there was a one in 10 million chance of a case of coronaviru­s arriving to Tasmania outside of a hotspot. The government refused to confirm this stat, instead trying to deflect and ignore.

When grilled on that number, which is a significan­t number delivered by a significan­t player in our coronaviru­s decision-making, Director of Public Health Mark Veitch bumbled his way through an answer.

This government is denying Tasmanians their freedoms, denying us access to our mainland families and crippling our businesses, and it doesn’t even have the decency to provide an explanatio­n for a number shared by one of the state’s top health officials.

In fact, the government has refused to provide us any risk-based data or modelling at all — a far cry from the example set early in the piece by Australia’s Chief Medical Officer, Brendan Murphy, who frequently provided audiovisua­l modelling to assist in the public’s understand­ing.

Instead Mr Gutwein, rather than answering a question about the one-in-10 million figure, effectivel­y told us to just appreciate how lucky we are not to be in Melbourne right now.

The state is panicked about another outbreak but that can’t be a reason for border closures. Heightened fear is not something Mr Gutwein should use to avoid answering questions like he did on Friday.

Mr Gutwein says our health is his priority but Prime Minister Scott Morrison said Mr Gutwein wanted Tasmania to allow overseas travellers returning to Australia to quarantine in our state.

Mr Gutwein said he was pushing for Hobart Airport to become an internatio­nal airport.

Mr Gutwein failed to rule out he would take internatio­nal travellers in exchange for the airport status — a horse-trade that would alarm many Tasmanians. This arrangemen­t must be clarified.

Mr Gutwein insists his decision-making is based on health advice then he fails to share the full details of that advice.

From Friday’s performanc­e there can be no other logical conclusion — this is as political as it is in our public health interests.

In the absence of transparen­t, robust and factbased messaging from the government, let us be clear: Tasmania deserves better.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia