Mercury (Hobart)

No trees or bees = no food

Tom Allen fears worst from forestry attacks on leatherwoo­d stands

- Tom Allen is campaign manager for the Wilderness Society.

THE cutting down of Easter Island’s last tree and the collapse of its civilisati­on resonates as a fable of counterpro­ductive ecological mismanagem­ent.

The Lorax is not a true story, yet speaks volumes — lutruwita/ Tasmania’s truffula trees are the equivalent of our rainforest leatherwoo­d trees, arguably the island’s singlemost agricultur­ally important plant species. And, according to Tasmania’s beekeeping industry, 80 per cent have been logged out of existence and, insanely, continue to be.

The leatherwoo­d honey industry is worth about $ 10m annually, but the pollinatio­n services of leatherwoo­d trees are worth millions more, approachin­g

$ 200m, because it flowers when no other species do, which keeps the island’s bee population­s going. Apiarist and recently departed Bob Davey, who long tried to protect leatherwoo­d, said “No leatherwoo­d, no bees. No bees, no food”. Bob was right. It’s really that simple.

But like a real- world fable, some beekeepers have their sights set on accessing the last remaining leatherwoo­d trees in the protected Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area, while doing nothing about the state government continuing to cut down rainforest­s and leatherwoo­d.

Some are though. A recent 7.30 Report featured a rightly angry beekeeper, Rodney Smith, who was relying on leatherwoo­d trees in a logging coupe for his livelihood, which were knowingly logged by Sustainabl­e Timber Tasmania ( formerly Forestry Tasmania).

Logging coupes stuffed full of mature and baby leatherwoo­d trees remain on STT’s logging schedule. Google Tyenna Big Tree Reserve. Go to the Florentine. See for yourself.

The government’s billiondol­lar agricultur­al expansion plans hang by the thread of remaining and still- beinglogge­d leatherwoo­d trees. The agreement between STT and the Tasmanian Beekeeping Associatio­n is meaningles­s because STT has since confirmed it can’t guarantee the protection of leatherwoo­d.

Kudos to the Liberal Party’s North- West Primary Industries Branch, which successful­ly passed a motion at its recent party conference calling on the government to protect leatherwoo­d. But will government act?

Before Bob Davey died, he talked of getting leatherwoo­ds legally protected. Even if they were, the native forestry industry’s soft- touch, lowstandar­d self- regulation EPBC- exempted approach would probably just mean business as usual.

There’s another looming threat. Bee and insect population­s are collapsing worldwide. Some regions have seen 90 per cent bee population collapses – you already know the causes: climate change, pollution, pesticides, habitat loss. In Tasmania we are sloshing around glyphosate and neonicotin­oids like it’s the 1950s.

Apiarists who take ecology seriously know it’s a question of time before collapsing bee population­s hit this island too. And Tasmania exports its still-stable bee population­s worldwide to prop- up declining population­s overseas.

If we treat our clean, green brand as a marketing opportunit­y disconnect­ed from ecological integrity, the brand will fail. But if the brand is led by ecological integrity, it will thrive. Tasmania can be a leader in regenerati­ve agricultur­e. To join this island’s regenerati­ve agricultur­e revolution, join our forum on November 26.

Details at bit.ly/Beecline

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia