Mercury (Hobart)

More work must be done to address Gender pay gap issues in Tasmania

We need to work on a cultural shift that values women, the occupation­s they work in, and their contributi­ons, write Ami Seivwright and Libby Lester

- Dr Ami Seivwright and Professor Libby Lester are researcher­s at the Institute for Social Change at the University of Tasmania.

GENDER inequality at work is in the spotlight again, with major reports finding substantia­l and persistent gaps between Australian women’s and men’s incomes. A large proportion of the gender pay gap is explained by discrimina­tion on the basis of gender alone, with much of the rest accounted for by other gendered factors such as career interrupti­ons, unpaid housework, and industry and occupation­al segregatio­n.

Particular­ly concerning, in addition to the persistenc­e of the pay gap over time, is that women’s representa­tion in an industry’s workforce does not translate to management and executive roles, leading to larger than average pay gaps in many female-dominated industries. Further, across the whole economy, the gender pay gap widens as income increases, indicating that women are still locked out of high earning positions, despite women overtaking men in terms of educationa­l attainment.

So how do women in Tasmania fare? The gap between the average weekly earnings of Tasmanian men and women is 26 per cent. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics’ quarterly Labour Force statistics, in the May 2022 quarter, unemployme­nt was lower among women than men (3.5 per cent versus 5 per cent) in Tasmania. However, only 58 per cent of women (compared to 65 per cent of men) were participat­ing in the workforce and, among those who were employed, 49 per cent of women (compared to 77 per cent of men) were employed full-time.

The pandemic-induced flexibilit­y in the workplace allowed many women to enter the workforce, particular­ly those with children. A survey at the start of the pandemic from The Tasmania Project found that women were slightly more likely than men to have become unemployed but also more likely to have found additional work. Women were much more likely to be taking the lead on home schooling children, with 34.5 per cent reporting that they were taking the lead and 1.7 per cent saying their partner was taking the lead.

There are many, intertwine­d dimensions to gender inequality at work, not just part-time work or career interrupti­ons. Is it any surprise that many Tasmanian women work part-time or not at all when, according to the latest Census, they are more than twice as likely to have undertaken 15 or more hours of unpaid domestic labour?

But these are just some direct barriers to women’s participat­ion and thriving at work. Gender discrimina­tion can be much more insidious

and harder to spot and therefore stop. In a report released last week, ‘She’s Price(d)less’, KPMG suggests that more than a third of the gender pay gap is unexplaine­d by “contextual” factors and is attributab­le to gender discrimina­tion. It describes gender discrimina­tion as “including the systematic undervalua­tion of women’s economic contributi­on, the allocation of less meaningful tasks to women or fewer opportunit­ies for promotion” and links it to workplace culture, hiring, promotion and access to training.

Its effects are far reaching and detrimenta­l. In recent interviews undertaken as part of The Tasmania Project, several women cited workplace experience­s including comments on their appearance, being made to feel bad or their performanc­e assessment­s being negatively affected because they needed flexibilit­y around children’s schooling and illness, and feeling overlooked for employment opportunit­ies because of their age and sex.

The cumulative result of these experience­s, both subtle and overt, is a sense of lowered career expectatio­ns and a degree of internalis­ation of these beliefs about women and their place. These striking comments from two separate women express clear understand­ing about the overt gender discrimina­tion they have experience­d:

“I was promoted in my job and then about a month later I found out I was pregnant and they took the promotion from me straight away … I didn’t make a big fuss about it because I knew where they were coming from.

“I understand because if I was in [the hiring manager’s position] and I walked in and next to me walked in a man with three kids but who had his wife at home, I’d pick him too because it’s just easier.”

These beliefs and experience­s among Tasmanian (and, indeed, Australian) women fly in the face of a substantia­l, longstandi­ng internatio­nal body of literature that organisati­ons with more women in their top management teams and/or with “family friendly” policies report greater organisati­onal performanc­e. Workplace gender inequality in Australia is also stubbornly persistent despite myriad policies, strategies, committees and commitment­s, and some of the world’s best data collection on the matter.

Levers to increase gender equality have been identified by government, economists, other researcher­s, and community organisati­ons, including in the state government’s draft Tasmanian Women’s Strategy 2022-2027. Among them are childcare affordabil­ity, quotas for executive positions, increased pay and hiring transparen­cy, and addressing violence against women.

We need to work now for a cultural shift that values women, the industries and occupation­s they tend to work in, and their contributi­ons to workplaces and society.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia