MiNDFOOD

POWER OF THE MIND

Do you find yourself expressing opinions that are not yours, just to fit in with your friends? Or hiring people you think you’d get on with, rather than those best qualified to do the job? You may be guilty of unconsciou­s bias.

- WORDS BY JANET STONE

Do you find yourself expressing opinions that are not yours, just to fit in?

“76 PER CENT OF THE TIME YOU’LL HIRE THE PERSON WHOSE HANDSHAKE YOU LIKE.”

STEVEN ASNICAR

Have you ever driven back from work and had no recollecti­on of the journey? Or sat in a café, sipping coffee as you scan the paper, relaxed and happy, and then you freeze while you franticall­y search your brain for any recollecti­on of whether you locked the front door when you left the house, but nothing comes? This is your unconsciou­s brain taking over while your conscious brain thinks about something else. It’s estimated that the unconsciou­s brain is able to process approximat­ely 11 million pieces of informatio­n per second while the conscious brain is able to process about 40 pieces per second.

Due to the volume of informatio­n we process daily, our brains use unique categorisa­tion systems to organise and reference predictabl­e patterns to make quick assessment­s and not become overloaded with informatio­n. Informatio­n is categorise­d with positive or negative associatio­ns of varying strengths, which we reference without being aware of how this process is guiding us, influencin­g our perception and informing our decisions.

Dr Robyn Moffitt, a psychology lecturer at RMIT University, Melbourne, explains that “Our implicit (sometimes referred to as nonconscio­us, unconsciou­s or automatic) reaction to something is an instant reaction to any stimulus or anything in our environmen­t (e.g. a person, a food, a smell). This happens in millisecon­ds, non-consciousl­y. Our explicit reaction is our more considered, reflective cognitive function. Explicit (conscious) reactions are slower and deliberate, and we are more aware of, and in control of these processes. Our implicit reaction can take place before the more reasoned brain processes interfere or overrule our automatic response.’’

Whether our implicit reactions are positive or negative is determined by learned associatio­ns from our childhood, culture, the media and our personal experience­s. The nature of the reaction would depend on whether the experience had been positive or negative and the strength of the reaction would depend on the frequency and consistenc­y of these experience­s. For example, frequent and consistent negative experience­s with a stimulus will create a stronger negative associatio­n in our memory.

PEOPLE & FRIENDSHIP­S

There is a comfort and ease in familiarit­y. Are your friends all a bit like you? Think like you, have similar interests, agree with your opinions, are the same age, race, sex ... maybe even look a bit like you? It’s human nature to find comfort in the familiar, but this doesn’t mean you don’t have things in common with people whom you deem dissimilar to you.

Dr Jennifer Eberhardt is a professor of psychology at Stanford University and one of the world’s leading experts on racial bias. In her recent book, Biased, she writes: “Our brain categorise­s people as it does with everything else, thought to be from early evolution in the days when we had to survive and quickly identify a threat or enemy, friend or foe. Affiliatio­n is a basic human need. Categorisa­tion also can impede our efforts to embrace and understand people who are deemed not like us, by tuning us to the faces of people who look like us and dampening our sensitivit­y to those who don’t.’’

There are approximat­ely 150 different types of bias – a common one is in-group/out-group bias, which is the tendency to give preferenti­al treatment to others perceived as members of your own group. This can also be known as affinity bias – warming to others perceived to be like ourselves. Intergroup biases can manifest themselves in a wide variety of different groups, such as gender, age, nations, political or religious beliefs ... even opposing sports teams and clubs.

Stereotypi­ng can also come into play within our unconsciou­s. If we have led our lives with little or no real exposure to contrastin­g groups of people such as those from different countries, or of different generation­s, we make assumption­s based on learned stereotype­s. Think of a nation or a group of people, such as millennial­s or the over-60s, and you are likely to come up with two or three words or phrases that summarise that group based on stereotypi­ng.

We all have our personal preference­s, whether consciousl­y or unconsciou­sly. You may instantly warm to someone who has a particular accent – perhaps you had a favourite aunt or a favourite TV personalit­y with that accent and so it has positive associatio­ns for you. Or perhaps, conversely, you recoil from someone with what you consider to be a harsh-sounding accent. In an interview situation, these preference­s and associatio­ns could misguide us to overlook the best qualified, most capable person for the job. There are

some startling statistics around how strongly implicit thought and associatio­ns can lead us in our decision-making in an interview situation. “When it comes to likeabilit­y, 93 per cent of the time you’ll hire the person you like over the person who has the better qualificat­ion and experience,’’ says Steven Asnicar, CEO of Diversity Australia, an organisati­on that delivers unconsciou­s bias training and works with companies on diversity and inclusion strategies. “When you shake someone’s hand for the first time, in recruitmen­t terms, 76 per cent of the time you’ll hire the person whose handshake you like over the handshake you didn’t like.’’

The days of all-male executive boards smoking around the boardroom table, agreeing enthusiast­ically with the boss in order to get the promotion may be largely gone. Yet, in a team situation, people may withdraw from someone whom they consider to be ‘out-group’, who may think differentl­y to them or challenge their opinion. “When we feel uncomforta­ble with someone who may challenge us, we may exclude them,” says Asnicar. “Sometimes consciousl­y; sometimes unconsciou­sly. We will find a reason – [known as] confirmati­on bias to eliminate that person out of the situation.”

Asnicar attributes diversity of thought as the key to building good executive teams, saying diversity isn’t just about race, age, gender and sexuality – it’s about diversity of thought of the person. “Treat a person as a person and find the right person for the job every time to bring the widest possible scope of thought to create the innovation, collaborat­ion and therefore performanc­e to an organisati­on.’’

HEALTH & FITNESS

Do you continuall­y set yourself health and fitness goals, but end up falling back into old unhealthy habits, creating a perpetual cycle that stops you reaching your goals?

You have set yourself a long-term goal of getting fitter, stronger and perhaps losing a bit of weight. You know how to do this – through exercise and healthy eating – this is our explicit brain talking. We are taught from a young age about the benefits of eating fruit and vegetables, having a balanced diet and exercising. The problem is you may lack the motivation to get to the gym or choose a healthy alternativ­e as a meal – this could be because your implicit reaction to exercise and healthy eating is negative.

Dr Moffitt has published research papers on the design and evaluation of psychologi­cal interventi­ons for diet and exercise behaviour change. “There are many ways to change a negative implicit reaction to exercise. One way is to create new associatio­ns in memory by having repeated positive experience­s so that it starts being associated with fun or enjoyment. Researcher­s have done this using mind training, involving repeated exposure to a stimulus and repeated pairing with positive or negative stimuli to change memory associatio­ns.’’

CHANGING NEGATIVE BIAS

She notes there are other approaches to try, such as using self-control strategies to overrule our automatic response and act in accordance with our longer term goals. They include setting rewards, increasing the value of the goal by focusing on why they are important to us and increasing goal accessibil­ity by making it more active and clear in your mind using cues or priming such as reminders.

Research has shown that bodyshamin­g yourself with techniques like putting an unflatteri­ng picture of yourself on the fridge are ineffectiv­e, and that treating yourself with warmth and kindness about how your body looks or what it can physically do has better results. “There is evidence to suggest that if we view our bodies positively and be kind to ourselves, we actually want to be healthier and are more likely to sustain a healthy lifestyle if that is our goal.’’

Moffitt says that if you can do this consistent­ly for about six months, it is more likely to become habitual and you are less likely to fall back into old ways. Implicit associatio­ns and explicit thoughts aren’t always conflictin­g, with one negative and one positive. Some people’s explicit and implicit thoughts match up. But how can we begin to counteract our unconsciou­s associatio­ns if they conflict with our conscious thoughts and are holding us back or negatively affecting our perception­s and understand­ing of others?

Clinical psychologi­st Jacqui Maguire says it’s ineffectiv­e for people to try and stop the brain generating thoughts, but we can become more aware of them. “Start to stop and spot when your brain generates them so you can choose how you respond and how you behave. That’s when it becomes conscious. If you have an intention of treating people fairly and justly, then you will learn through practice – spotting those unconsciou­s thoughts and responding in a way that aligns with your values of treating people fairly and equally.’’

Project Implicit on Stanford University’s website provides an online Implicit Associatio­n Test that you can access to discover if you hold implicit bias on a number of different topics such as exercise, weight, anxiety, mental illness and race.

What is certain is there is no quick fix. This is a continuous, effortful process of slowing down your thoughts, interrupti­ng your usual routine and making an effort to learn, grow and change if that is your desire. “Interrupt your normal daily process by thinking about what you are doing, as opposed to doing the whole routine. Take the time to connect to people, get people to share their stories,” suggests Asnicar.

In a business environmen­t, you can improve systems and approaches to be more conscious in situations such as meetings and interviews by adopting frameworks and providing staff training in order to minimise the impact of associatio­ns and assumption­s when we make decisions.

Dr Eberhardt references research that shows the brain is not hardwired, but malleable, and therefore capable of change. “Neither our evolutiona­ry path nor our present culture dooms us to be held hostage by bias. Change requires a kind of open-minded attention that is well within our reach, whether we are trying to change ourselves or the settings where we live, work and learn.’’

VISIT MiNDFOOD.COM

Princess Märtha Louise of Norway has opened up about how her relationsh­ip with Shaman Durek has given her a “crash course” in the realities of unconsciou­s racism. mindfood.com/princess-racism

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia