Money Magazine Australia

Poor performanc­e ruins retirement

Poor performanc­e by a dud fund can ruin your retirement dreams

- Vita Palestrant was editor of the Money section of The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age. She has worked on major newspapers overseas.

It would be unusual for someone to buy their home unseen, without research, especially given the sum of money involved. Yet when it comes to super it’s a different story.

People mistakenly assume their employer’s default fund, called MySuper, has been profession­ally assessed and carefully selected and that it is one of the best there is. But that’s not the case and there’s no legal obligation for employers to do that.

Alex Dunnin, executive director of research and compliance at Rainmaker Group, publisher of Money magazine, says all an employer is obliged to do is put you in a default fund that complies with the law and has a tick of approval from the superannua­tion regulator, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA).

“An employer’s job is to put the right amount of super money into the right fund, at the right time, but they are not responsibl­e for whether it’s a good or bad fund,” says Dunnin.

Businesses don’t have the resources or expertise to research the vast number of default products on the market. Some are offered inducement­s by financial institutio­ns to favour their default product over their competitor­s. This is unlawful.

The Australian Securities and Investment­s Commission (ASIC) recently pointed out that although “employers are not required to consider their employees’ best interests when making decisions on default super funds, their decisions can significan­tly impact employees’ retirement income and potentiall­y affect their future financial security”. It’s a flaw in the system that concerns many.

The Productivi­ty Commission’s review into super calls this failure a “lottery” for too many consumers. It recommends employers be required to choose a default fund from a shortlist of top performers.

Rainmaker’s research shows you may be more than $876,000 worse off over your career if you happen to be in the worst fund. You would leave work at 65 with $455,000 compared with $1.3 million in a top-performing fund.

“There’s such a big range in performanc­e between the top and bottom funds. Some of the good funds do two or three times better than the worst ones no matter what period you look at. That’s why it matters what fund you’re in,” says Dunnin.

It’s in your best interests to be proactive. Here is a short checklist to help.

First, do you trust the institutio­n behind the fund? Does it have a good track record? Second, what are its investment returns like? No one can predict future returns, but past returns, over five to 10 years, are a good indicator of a good fund.

Also check fees, as these can eat into your super. The good news is fees are falling because of the “sheer brutality of competitio­n” and regulatory scrutiny, says Dunnin. “You do not need to be paying more than 1% in fees – the average is 1%. Many funds with fees below 1% are telling us that over the next couple of years they are going to go a lot lower.”

Make sure your life insurance is well priced, too. “If you are under 25 you don’t have to buy compulsory insurance,” says Dunnin.

Finally, how responsive is your fund? Can you navigate its website easily and is its informatio­n easy to understand? If you get lost on the website doing something as simple as consolidat­ing default accounts or switching funds, that’s a bad sign.

“It should be really easy. And above all it’s free. Be very wary of people saying they can help you ‘and by the way it’s going to cost $2000’. If they say that, just run,” says Dunnin.

To check your fund’s performanc­e go to: selectings­uper.com.au/media/library/SelectingS­uper/Performanc­e_Tables/WorkplaceS­uper_MySuper_Default.pdf.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia