NPhoto

Features to look for…

Draw up a wish list for your ideal DX ultra-wide zoom

-

Compared with the natural field of human vision, a standard zoom lens gives a blinkered view.

For sweeping landscapes, you’ll often find that you can’t squeeze everything you want into the frame. The situation is worse when you’re shooting cramped interiors, where you can literally have your back against the wall and still not be able to shoehorn much into an image. The solution to the problem is an ultra-wide lens.

In this test we’re focusing on DX-format lenses (we’ll cover full-frame-friendly FX ones next month), so the 1.5x crop factor needs to be taken into account. A standard 18-55mm kit lens has an ‘effective’ zoom range of 2782.5mm. 50mm has always been considered a standard focal length for 35mm film cameras and fullframe D-SLRs, with 24mm, 28mm and 35mm being popular wideangle focal lengths, so an 18-55mm DX zoom lens covers the latter two of these options but sometimes it doesn’t stretch wide enough. A 10-20mm lens, for example, has an effective zoom range of 15-30mm, expanding the maximum angle of view to about 110 degrees, compared with about 75 degrees for an 18-55mm. That might not sound a lot extra but in practice the difference is enormous.

DX or don’t bother!

Using an FX lens on a DX camera is handy when you want to extend your reach. However, the situation is reversed when you’re trying to extend your angle of view. In most cases FX lenses’ longer focal lengths will fail to give you an ultra-wide viewing angle. The fullframe-compatible Sigma 12-24mm is an exception, but you’ll generally need to buy an ultra-wide lens that’s specifical­ly designed for the DX format. Nikon and Tokina both use the ‘DX’ designatio­n, whereas it’s ‘DC’ for Sigma and ‘Di II’ for Tamron. Full-frame lenses from these manufactur­ers are classified as ‘FX’, ‘DG’ and ‘Di’ respective­ly.

When you buy a lens, it’s worth weighing up the advantages and disadvanta­ges of zoom and prime optics. Zoom lenses give more versatilit­y, whereas prime lenses often deliver greater sharpness, wider available apertures and lower levels of distortion­s. Many photograph­ers tend to use ultrawide lenses at or near their shortest focal length to really make the most of their potential. It’s a strange fact, then, that until recently there were no rectilinea­r ultra-wide prime lenses on the market for Nikon cameras – Samyang’s 10mm f/2.8 ED AS NCS CS prime lens should be on sale by the time this issue reaches you.

Rectilinea­r lenses aim to keep distortion­s to a minimum and, as far as possible, give a natural perspectiv­e. Another option is curvilinea­r or ‘fisheye’ lenses. These give an even greater angle of view, often as much as 180 degrees in both horizontal and vertical planes, but with extreme barrel distortion. They’re very specialise­d lenses and completely different to rectilinea­r optics, so we’re not covering them in this group test.

 ??  ?? Front element
With an internal focus system, the front element doesn’t rotate during focusing, which is a bonus when using some types of filter. All the lenses in this test have internal focus systems.
Focal length
A short minimum focal length is...
Front element With an internal focus system, the front element doesn’t rotate during focusing, which is a bonus when using some types of filter. All the lenses in this test have internal focus systems. Focal length A short minimum focal length is...

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia