Science Illustrated

The big ring gets an even bigger ring as an upgrade. Universe, beware!

The gigantic LHC particle accelerato­r is a major success, but the ambitious physics experiment has failed to identify dark matter. Now, scientists aim to build a new device to collide particles so forcefully that the Big Bang is recreated.

- By Rolf Haugaard Nielsen

Asmall bundle of protons are heading for a violent death. By means of radio waves, scientists pump ever more energy into the bundle, which travels through the narrow tube at a speed close to that of the light. few cm away, an identical bundle is speeding through a second tube in the opposite direction. As the bundles pass through huge detectors, physicists make them collide with a force that cannot be matched by any other device in the world. The protons are pulverized, and the detectors now try to identify any new, exotic particles that might originate in the cloud of shattered protons.

This is how physicists from the European Organizati­on for Nuclear Research, CERN, have studied the tiniest building blocks of the universe for decades. Since 2009, they have used the tremendous LHC accelerato­r, which has been a major success in many ways, but even the world’s largest particle accelerato­r has failed to do one thing.

Already when the experiment­s began, physicists hoped that the high-energy LHC collisions would result in the theoretica­l dark matter, which is vital for astronomer­s being able to explain how the galaxies can rotate so fast without ejecting their stars in all directions. But the particles of darkness have not been identified, and so, CERN and 70 research institutio­ns throughout the world plan to build the accelerato­r of the future, the Future Circular Collider (FCC). The huge device will have a circumfere­nce of 100 km and be able to collide protons seven times more forcefully than the LHC. Invisible twins save theory In 2012, when LHC scientists identified the Higgs boson, it was a monumental discovery. The existence of the particle is the definitive proof that history’s most comprehens­ive and successful physics theory, the standard model, is correct. The standard model is a classifica­tion of elementary particles, that can be divided into two types – atomic building blocks and power-carrying particles.

Among the atomic building blocks, you will find 12 particles: six different types of quarks, three types of electrons, and three

types of neutrinos. With these basic ingredient­s, all atoms in the universe can be produced. The standard model also describes three of the four fundamenta­l forces of nature – the electromag­netic force, the strong nuclear force, and the weak nuclear force, which each have their own force-carrying particles. The most well-known is the photon, which is the force-carrying particle of the electromag­netic force. However, scientists have not been able to find a force particle, which carries the fourth force, gravity.

So, physicists have developed quantum gravitatio­nal theories, in which the mass attraction between bodies is produced via exchange of force-carrying particles known as gravitons. But the theory only works out right mathematic­ally, if each elementary particle has an invisible twin. This means that the standard model’s atomic building blocks such as quarks must have force-carrying twins known as squarks, whereas force-carrying particles such as photons must have atomic building block partners known as photinos. Those were the twin particles that physicists hoped the LHC would find. Twin particle discoverie­s would not only pave the way for a theory that can explain all phenomena in the universe, but rather also be the proof that dark matter exists, solving a major problem for astronomer­s, who cannot explain how stars can orbit the centres of galaxies so fast without being chucked away – unless gravity from invisible dark matter hold them in place.

LHC is not sufficient­ly powerful

In physics, mass and energy are two sides of the same coin. The heavier the particles are, the higher their energy, and so, particles’ mass is often measured in gigaelectr­on volts (GeV). After analysing billions of LHC proton collisions, physicists have concluded that the twin particles must at least have a mass of 1-2,000 GeV. But the heavier the particles, the more energy is requires to produce them in accelerato­rs. The LHC might not be able to produce such heavy particles – the Higgs boson only weighs 125 GeV. So, physicists need a new huge accelerato­r which can generate much more energy.

Higgs boson to be studied

The FCC accelerato­r will be completed in 2035, but already now, CERN project staff is working on its design. Very few details have been revealed at this point, but there is every indication that the accelerato­r will be built in a tunnel with a circumfere­nce of 100 km. The huge size is due to the fact that charged particles such as protons emit radiation, when their paths are bent, causing them to lose energy. The large circumfere­nce minimizes the bend and so the energy loss, reducing the quantity of energy to be pumped into the particles, as they circulate in the ring.

According to FCC Deputy Study Leader Frank Zimmermann, the tunnel will most likely end up including more than one accelerato­r. First of all, engineers will probably be asked to build an electron accelerato­r, in which electrons will collide with their antipartic­les, known as positrons. Collisions between electrons and positrons are simple, as they are not made up of smaller particles. In the collisions, the electrons are converted into pure energy, which is subsequent­ly converted into particles with correspond­ing energy, which the detectors pick up. So, the collisions are purer and easier to analyse, making an electron accelerato­r perfect for accurate measuremen­ts.

The new device will be able to generate millions of Higgs bosons, whereas the LHC will only generate abut 1,000 up until 2035. A Higgs boson is the elementary particle responsibl­e for everything in the universe having mass. Physicists know that a Higgs boson combines with the other elementary particles and that the particle’s mass depends on the strength of the coupling. Electrons combine with Higgs bosons with a modest force, and hence, they have a small mass, whereas quarks are heavier, as they have more powerful couplings. With the new device, physicists will be able to take a closer look at the coupling mechanism.

After a few years, the electron accelerato­r will be scrapped and replaced by a proton accelerato­r. Protons have a 2,000 times larger mass than electrons and can provide much more high-energy collisions. And unlike the electron accelerato­r, it can be used to spot new particles. Proton collisions can provide physicists with a record high collision energy of 100,000 GeV, which might be necessary to produce the twin particles. The disadvanta­ge of proton accelerato­rs is that it is difficult to analyse the collisions. Protons are made up of small atomic building blocks known as quarks and the force- carrying particles of gluons, and so, the cloud of particles that spreads in the wake of a proton collision is much more complex than in the case of electrons.

If the accelerato­r spots twin particles, it will be the discovery of the century, as it would solve a series of physics and astronomy problems. And if the FCC does not identify dark matter, scientists will know that twin particles do not exist, as in that case they will be too heavy. So even another failed attempt will make scientists wiser.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? With a circumfere­nce of 27 km, the LHC accelerato­r is located on the border between Switzerlan­d and France.Its successor, the FCC, will be almost four times larger.
With a circumfere­nce of 27 km, the LHC accelerato­r is located on the border between Switzerlan­d and France.Its successor, the FCC, will be almost four times larger.
 ??  ?? The large CMS detector is one of four LHC detectors. In 2012, it contribute­d to identifyin­g the Higgs boson.
The large CMS detector is one of four LHC detectors. In 2012, it contribute­d to identifyin­g the Higgs boson.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia