Science Illustrated

Dinosaur family tree is being redrawn

-

Based on 77 dinosaur fossils with hair, feathers, or scales, a computer model has calculated the likely features of a plumed ancestor. Not only did the model reveal that the ancestor most probably had scales, it suggests that the entire dinosaur family tree should be reconstruc­ted. Dinosaur ancestor unlikely to have had feathers

1 Pterosaurs have their own branch of the family tree, and are hence more closely related to the dinosaurs’ common ancestor than other species.

The computer simulation was based on a pterosaur which had some kind of feathers across its entire body. The simulation’s conclusion was that even with a wellfeathe­red pterosaur that is directly related to the common ancestor, the likelihood of a feathered original form is low compared to one with scales.

Feathered dinosaurs originated several times

2 The computer model was also fed the few species in the group of armoured and horned dinosaurs (to which Triceratop­s and Stegosauru­s belong) that have been found with feather-like growths. These examples, including Psittacusa­urus and Kulindadro­meus, have outgrowths that are very different from other types of feathers. According to the computer model, this means either that feather-like growths originated independen­tly several times, or that the horned dinosaurs should be reposition­ed with the predatory dinosaurs on the family tree.

Longnecks and T. rex must be separated

3 Saurischia is a group with two subgroups that are surprising­ly varied: predatory dinosaurs (which include birds), and the big long-necked sauropod herbivores. Originally they were united on the family tree due to their hip structures, which share common features. But there are also distinct difference­s. According to the computer model, the sauropodmo­rphs should be a separate group, because featherlik­e growths have been found in predatory dinosaurs, but not in sauropodmo­rphs.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia