The Australian Mining Review

Shutdown & Rehabilita­iton

The ability to successful­ly rehabilita­te mined areas is fundamenta­l to the industry’s social licence to operate.

- Chris Foley

THE USE of land for mining stretches back to the 1840s in Australia.

From the early silver discoverie­s in South Australia to the gold rushes of Victoria and the recent WA boom – mining has always been a feature of the country’s economic landscape and a significan­t contributo­r to its wealth.

Mining continues strongly today, however one element has only recently achieved prominence: the issue of how to rehabilita­te the land.

In February this year, research by a Melbourne public policy think tank suggested that there were more than 60,000 abandoned mines in Australia, with only a handful ever being completely rehabilita­ted.

As the recent mining boom draws to a close, environmen­tal issues become further entrenched in political agendas and the everyday lives of people and business.

Mining companies are increasing­ly beginning to factor in both the necessity and costs how to restore the land to an acceptable standard once all resources have been extracted.

Although most States have their own legislativ­e requiremen­ts that encourage this aim, no uniform laws exist at present and this can result in uneven restorativ­e outcomes.

According to an industry report commission­ed by the Minerals Council of Australia last year, the ability to successful­ly rehabilita­te mined areas is fundamenta­l to the industry’s social licence to operate and a foundation for demonstrat­ing the industry’s commitment to operating responsibl­y.

“During developmen­t and operation, mines bring significan­t benefits to regional areas through economic developmen­t, capacity building and infrastruc­ture.

However, mining operations are finite in nature and mining is only one of many alternativ­e land uses over time,” the report stated.

“The Australian minerals industry recognises its responsibi­lity as a temporary custodian of land to contribute to sustainabl­e land use outcomes.

“It is the industry’s goal that previously mined land is available for future economic activity, conservati­on or community use.”

Similarly, according to the Federal Government’s Mine Rehabilita­tion Handbook, mine site rehabilita­tion should now be viewed as an integral component of a mining company’s sustainabl­e developmen­t strategies and considered a key performanc­e indicator against which the company’s environmen­tal performanc­e is judged.

The handbook states any mine site rehabilita­tion plan should be designed to meet three key objectives:

1) the long-term stability and sustainabi­lity of the landforms, soils and hydrology of the site.

2) the partial or full repair of ecosystem capacity to provide habitats for biota and services for people.

3) the prevention of pollution of the surroundin­g environmen­t.

Engagement with landholder­s, local communitie­s and other stakeholde­rs is essential in the developmen­t, implementa­tion and review of mine closure and rehabilita­tion strategies for mining companies.

Community input helps shape final land use objectives for closed mines.

From site closure to rehabilita­tion

According to the Fraser Institute the mine closure process typically consists of several steps:

Shut-down:

Once production stops, the number of workers is reduced, and only a small labour force is retained to permanentl­y shut down the mining equipment.

In some cases, the mining company may provide re-training or early retirement options to their workers before the mine is closed.

Decommissi­oning:

Small crews or contractor­s decommissi­on or take apart the mining processing facilities and equipment.

Pipelines are drained, equipment and parts are cleaned and sold, buildings are repurposed or demolished, warehouse materials are recovered, and waste is disposed of.

Remediatio­n/reclamatio­n:

The objective of reclamatio­n is to return the land and watercours­es to an acceptable standard of productive use, ensuring that any landforms and structures are stable, and any watercours­es are of acceptable water quality.

Reclamatio­n typically involves a number of activities such as removing any hazardous materials, reshaping the land, restoring topsoil, and planting native grasses, trees, or ground cover.

Post-closure:

Monitoring programs are used to assess the effectiven­ess of the reclamatio­n measures and to identify any corrective action that may be needed.

In addition, mines may require long-term care and maintenanc­e after mine closure such as ongoing treatment of mine discharge water, periodic monitoring and maintenanc­e of tailings containmen­t structures, and monitoring any ongoing remediatio­n technologi­es used such as constructe­d wetlands.

Perth-based Griffin Coal follows a four step process that involves “returning the land to its natural state post-mining through strict, well researched strategies of revegetati­on and the regenerati­on of natural ecosystems”.

Work to restore disturbed areas is carried out progressiv­ely as soon as practicabl­e with the objective to create a structural­ly stable landform capable of future productive use.”

Rehabilita­tion involves a comprehens­ive process of classifyin­g overburden material; land recontouri­ng, seeding and regenerati­on as follows:

Overburden Material Classifica­tion:

Overburden material is classified according to its potential to cause geochemica­l impacts (acid rock drainage) on the environmen­t.

Dumping of waste material is undertaken so the best materials end up near the surface of waste landforms and the other material is encapsulat­ed in the middle.

Land Recontouri­ng:

When landforms are no longer needed for mining or dumping purposes the slopes are recontoure­d to around 10 degrees to control surface runoff and to ensure a stable slope.

Topsoil is then spread to a depth of 150 millimetre­s before the area is contour ripped, fertilised and seeded with local natives.

Seeding:

Rehabilita­tion areas are seeded at the break of the winter rainy season, and can initially be susceptibl­e to erosion damage until germinatio­n and root developmen­t occurs.

Regenerati­on:

As native species do not germinate and develop until the following spring, native bush species comprising grasses; groundcove­rs, shrubs and trees, are sown together with a “nurse” crop of cereal rye.

The cereal rye germinates quickly and stabilises the surface through the winter and the natives then emerge the following spring.

The seed mix includes Jarrah, Wandoo, Flooded Gum, numerous Acacias and understore­y species.

Hazelwood Rehabilita­tion Project

The owner of Victoria’s recently closed brown coal Hazelwood power station and mine in the La Trobe Valley – French global energy provider ENGIE – has revealed the rehabilita­tion of the mine is expected to cost $439 million, with the cost for remediatio­n on the power station site $304m.

It will be the first mine in Australia of its type and size to be rehabilita­ted and is expected to take a number of years to complete.

Current rehabilita­tion work at the site includes continued overburden stripping in the Northfield with the bucket wheel excavator, Dredger 25.

This overburden is being relocated to cover coal and also to place up against the existing batters to assist the long term stability.

Dredger 25 is operationa­l and rehabilita­tion of the eastern batters is continuing with the cutting down of the coal batters, reshaping and re-profiling them to a 3:1 gradient.

The company is also in the process of removing redundant infrastruc­ture and erecting new infrastruc­ture, which includes relocating roads and powerlines.

ENGIE will be providing an exclusive update and interview in The Australian Mining Review in the first half of 2018.

 ?? All images: Lauren Carey, ENGIE. ??
All images: Lauren Carey, ENGIE.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia