The Cairns Post

Dangers of ignoring Twitter

- Rita Panahi Rita Panahi is a Herald Sun columnist

TRYING to convince sensible adults to dip their toe in the Twitterver­se can be a futile exercise particular­ly if they, like more than 90 per cent of the population, are somewhere right of Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young on the political spectrum.

“Why would I want to waste my time on that cesspit?” is a common response.

One colleague, unmoved by my argument that Twitter can be useful, informativ­e and fun if you just recognise its shortcomin­gs, likened participat­ing in the social media network to sticking your head in a filthy toilet.

But swimming in that toilet, among the social justice activists, sad trolls and celebrity watchers, are much of the mainstream and new media.

One can’t underestim­ate Twitter’s influence on determinin­g what you read or watch on the nightly news.

For conservati­ves and genuine centrists to ignore the site only makes it more unrepresen­tative.

Part of the reason why the Brexit and Trump phenomena blindsided the media is their reliance on social media as an accurate tool of measuring public sentiment.

It’s all too easy for left-leaning members of the media class to assume that Twitter must be representa­tive of the wider population.

Twitter not only skews far more left than left-leaning Facebook but it is often a parallel universe obsessed with second and third-tier issues.

If Twitter was representa­tive, the battle to be prime minister would be between Richard Di Natale and Bill Shorten, while the issue keeping most Australian­s up at night wouldn’t be cost of living or law and order, but offshore processing of asylum-seekers and the Adani coal mine.

Donald Trump would be locked up for being “literally Hitler” and Jeremy Corbyn would’ve won in a landslide so devastatin­g that it relegated the Tories to a fringe party.

Where Twitter has been enormously useful is in exposing the deep political biases of supposedly impartial reporters and academics.

It’s one thing to boldly state your position in an opinion column, such as this, but quite another to allow your own beliefs to colour news reporting that is meant to be utterly neutral and designed to inform rather than influence the audience.

The hysterical coverage of all things Trump is easily understood if you check the Twitter timeline of members of the media doing the reporting who are unashamed about the extent of their hatred for the US president.

Check the tweets of academics working at Australian universiti­es and you’ll soon learn just how far left the great majority of them lean.

Twitter’s unpleasant­ness is a tad more complex than just nameless trolls’ indiscrimi­nate abuse of all and sundry.

Twitter is where leftist bullies maliciousl­y attack, misreprese­nt and defame their ideologica­l opponents while pretending to be compassion­ate.

Of course, there are plenty of extreme right-wing accounts which also cross the line, but they are far more likely to be banned for their hatefilled antics.

There is a double standard in controvers­ial conservati­ve and rightwing accounts being culled while blue-tick progressiv­es wishing death and disease on their political adversarie­s and indulging in the most outrageous smears appear immune from censure.

If you’re a conservati­ve and active on Twitter, then expect to be attacked.

I’ve been called a Zionist whore and a Nazi on the same day.

For supposedly tolerant people who embrace diversity, the left can be quick to resort to vile racial slurs if a minority dares think for themselves and deviates from their assigned role as a migrant pet mindlessly regurgitat­ing progressiv­e talking points.

It’s important that conservati­ves are not entirely absent from Twitter.

Conservati­ves need to stop adopting an apologetic tone for being conservati­ve and be bolder and prouder on social media.

Trump has masterfull­y used the site to run rings around the bulk of the media, who seem incapable of understand­ing why he won.

But one wonders whether his account would’ve survived were he not the leader of the free world.

TWITTER IS WHERE LEFTIST BULLIES MALICIOUSL­Y ATTACK, MISREPRESE­NT AND DEFAME THEIR IDEOLOGICA­L OPPONENTS WHILE PRETENDING TO BE COMPASSION­ATE

 ??  ?? SKEWED IDEAS: Twitter does not represent the wider population.
SKEWED IDEAS: Twitter does not represent the wider population.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia