Netting a public threat
The research looked at the level of “cyber troop teams” in different countries, which the report defined as government or political party actors tasked with manipulating public opinion online, as well as the general level of resources spent to conduct research on social networks, or to combat misinformation.
It identified Australia as having a “low capacity” when it came to cyber troops, meaning fewer actors were trying to manipulate the news and information shared on social media (as well as fight against manipulation) compared to a country like the US, for example.
It described a low cyber troop capacity as “small teams that may be active during elections or referendums, but which then stop activity until the next election cycle”.
The FBI is currently investigating Russia’s involvement in influencing the previous US presidential election, and Mr Dreyfus said a similar thing could conceivably happen in Australia.
“It’s welcome that social media companies are working to ensure their platforms aren’t being used to covertly influence our democratic system. We’d be foolish to think what happened in the US couldn’t happen here,” he wrote on Twitter.
His comments were referring to a vow by Facebook to protect democratic elections against interference with a dedicated team of security specialists – including Australia’s federal election next year.
“We’re taking a number of steps to protect and preserve the integrity of upcoming elections around the world. Australia is no exception,” the Facebook spokesman told Fairfax.
The social media giant said it was increasing the number of people working on safety and security issues around the world to 20,000 by the end of the year.
It comes as the company faces increased pressure for its role in election meddling and criticism that its platform has helped to undermine democratic processes.
The Oxford report highlighted how political parties were increasingly trying to manufacture consensus by coopting social media.