The Cairns Post

Facebook rejects plan

Concern over ‘news regulator’

- LAURA POLSON, AAP

FACEBOOK has serious concerns about the competitio­n watchdog’s proposed news and advertisin­g regulator, fearing it could disrupt Australian­s’ newsfeeds.

The Australian Competitio­n and Consumer Commission in December released a preliminar­y report into the impact digital platforms are having on competitio­n in local media and advertisin­g.

The ACCC recommende­d a regulatory authority be given the power to “monitor, investigat­e and report” on how news and advertisin­g is ranked on digital platforms.

Facebook executives insist they want to work with the Federal Government on policy but took issue with a number of the watchdog’s recommenda­tions during a Sydney briefing with reporters.

Facebook argues a number of the recommenda­tions – such as the government-regulated ranking system – could cause “significan­t harm”.

“The proposed level of regulatory interventi­on for the news regulator and ad regulator is unpreceden­ted as far as I’ve seen,” Facebook competitio­n spokeswoma­n Samantha Knox said.

“Our view is that people, and not regulators, should decide what you see on (your) newsfeed.

“The point of Facebook is to connect you with friends and family and content that you care about. It is not to be primarily a channel of news distributi­on.” The social media giant’s Australia and New Zealand public policy director, Mia Garlick, said the regulation­s would favour particular publishers.

She argued users should control what they see.

“We genuinely have concerns about the impact on consumer benefit here,” Ms Garlick told reporters.

“If suddenly it’s decided by this regulator ‘Oh actually people should see more of this type of content’ that’s a very new space to get into where the regulator is suddenly deciding what Australian­s should be seeing on their newsfeed.”

Facebook could be more transparen­t and better educate consumers regarding tools to tailor their newsfeeds, such as advertisin­g preference­s, Ms Garlick admitted.

Facebook competitio­n spokesman Matt Perault says any additional regulation should aim to solve a specific problem.

Rules that restrict hate speech could also impact free expression, he said, noting: “Those are considerat­ions that need to be balanced.”

Facebook insisted it wasn’t solely responsibl­e for the decline in mainstream media.

“The proposed ‘news ranking regulator’ will not solve the problem of how to support sustainabl­e journalism in Australia,” Facebook’s formal response to the ACCC report states.

“The monetisati­on challenges facing some publishers began long before Facebook.”

The ACCC’s preliminar­y report said while digital platforms had revolution­ised communicat­ion and offered many benefits they were also “gateways” to informatio­n.

“Organisati­ons like Google and Facebook are more than mere distributo­rs or pure intermedia­ries in the supply of news in Australia; they increasing­ly perform similar functions as media businesses like selecting, curating and ranking content,” watchdog chairman Rod Sims said in late 2018.

“Yet, digital platforms face less regulation than many media businesses.”

The ACCC is due to provide its final report to the government in early June.

 ?? Photo: iStock ?? NOT HAPPY: Facebook doesn’t want Australian­s’ news consumptio­n monitored by a government regulator, as suggested in a preliminar­y report into digital platforms.
Photo: iStock NOT HAPPY: Facebook doesn’t want Australian­s’ news consumptio­n monitored by a government regulator, as suggested in a preliminar­y report into digital platforms.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia