The Cairns Post

Big banks slow to act

Corporate cop pans ‘unreasonab­le’ delays

- BEN BUTLER

THE corporate watchdog has lashed Australia’s biggest financial institutio­ns for “unreasonab­ly” delaying investigat­ions into scandals in which they charged customers for services they never provided.

The Australian Securities and Investment­s Commission has warned the six big players – AMP, ANZ, the Commonweal­th Bank, Macquarie, National Australia Bank and Westpac – that it was looking forward to using new powers agreed to by the Federal Government.

Those powers would enable ASIC to compel banks to put proper compensati­on programs in place.

The regulator yesterday issued a detailed report card on the failings of the institutio­ns.

It reveals its concerns over inadequate compensati­on schemes at ANZ and Macquarie, a “fundamenta­l disagreeme­nt” with the CBA over evidence gathering, and that NAB subsidiary JBWere has so far not even agreed a method for working out which customers were dudded.

Commission­er Danielle Press said the institutio­ns had “failed to sufficient­ly prioritise and resource their reviews, particular­ly as ASIC advised them to commence the reviews in mid-2015 or early 2016”.

Key reasons for the delays were given as poor record keeping and a failure by some of the institutio­ns to put forward remediatio­n schemes that properly identified and compensate­d customers hit by ASIC commission­er Danielle Press criticises the major banks for their slow response in looking into failings the fee-for-no-services scandals. Another main reason included a “legalistic approach” to figuring out the services to which clients were entitled, ASIC said.

The reviews cover potential fee-for-no-service rip-offs that are additional to those the institutio­ns have reported to ASIC since 2013.

That was when the regulator first began to seriously examine the finance sector’s long-running habit of charging customers but giving them nothing in return.

Together, the six institutio­ns have so far paid or offered $350 million in compensati­on and expect to shell out a total of about $800 million once the new reviews are finally complete.

“These reviews have been unreasonab­ly delayed,” Ms Press said.

 ??  ?? (The banks) have failed to sufficient­ly prioritise and resource their reviews, particular­ly as ASIC advised them to commence the reviews in mid-2015 or early 2016.
(The banks) have failed to sufficient­ly prioritise and resource their reviews, particular­ly as ASIC advised them to commence the reviews in mid-2015 or early 2016.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia