The Chronicle

Citizenshi­p mess

- — BEVAN CONROY, Toowoomba

IT APPEARS our “political leaders” have really created a minefield for themselves with the dual citizenshi­p fiasco or rather the potential disqualifi­cation of members of Parliament under Section 44 of the Australian Constituti­on fiasco.

An Act to constitute the Commonweal­th of Australia was passed by the United Kingdom Government and proclaimed by Queen Victoria on September 17, 1900 (prior to the formation of the Commonweal­th of Australia Government) and this Act remains an Act of the United Kingdom Government and not of the Australian Government. Clause 9 of this Act is the Commonweal­th of Australia Constituti­on, which contains eight Chapters (totalling 128 Sections). The contents of these 128 Sections only may be amended by the Australian Government by referendum in which a majority of the electors in a majority of the States vote for the amendment.

Section 44 of the Constituti­on states Any person who:

is under any acknowledg­ement of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power; or...

shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a member of the House of Representa­tives.

So not only does this section disqualify a citizen of a foreign power from sitting in either House, but it also disqualifi­es anyone who has sworn allegiance to a foreign power. Included in the Act to constitute the Commonweal­th of Australia is a Schedule containing the Oath or Affirmatio­n (which must be sworn by each elected member prior to taking their place in either House). The Oath states I, A.B., do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria, Her heirs and successors according to law. So help me God

This would suggest that every member of Parliament (both Houses), upon swearing the Oath (which they must do) have sworn allegiance to a foreign power and thus have made themselves ineligible to sit in either House. As the Oath is outside Clause 9 it cannot be changed by referendum but only by the United Kingdom Government and that government has not elected to change it. If every member of both Houses is invalid then surely every law passed in both Houses is also invalid.

The Overview within the Constituti­on states any action, including legislativ­e action, is invalid if it is contrary to the Constituti­on. Swearing the Oath of allegiance to a foreign power is contrary to the constituti­on and invalidate­s all those who have sworn it ie every politician past and present.

There is some relief for the poor down trodden elector though under

Section 46 Penalty for sitting when disqualifi­ed

Until the Parliament otherwise provides, any person declared by this Constituti­on to be incapable of sitting as a senator or a member of the House of Representa­tives shall, for every day on which he so sits, be liable to pay the sum of one hundred pounds to any person who sues for it in any court of competent jurisdicti­on.

Would be interestin­g if every person in Australia sued every politician for $200 per day for every day they have sat in either house of Parliament.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia