The Chronicle

Abbott’s ‘pious’ move failed as vote neared

- Charis Chang, Megan Palin and Malcolm Farr

TONY Abbott did his best but could not stop the passage of the same-sex marriage bill through Federal Parliament yesterday.

There were euphoric scenes on the floor of the House of Representa­tives as the bill was passed at 4.58pm (AEST).

It seemed only four MPs voted against the bill, although there were abstention­s.

As the vote neared, Mr Abbott actively argued against approval of the bill, lodging an amendment to stop its progress and slamming the Prime Minister and Leader of the Opposition for not including religious protection­s.

The Liberal MP and former prime minister said the bill was being done “on the run” and both the PM and the Leader of the Opposition had promised protection­s around freedom of religion would be in place.

“A promise was made by the leaders of this parliament and this promise has not been adequately delivered on,” he said.

Mr Abbott said had never heard members of the House showing such “supine respect” for a bill from the Senate like it was a “tablet of stone” and beyond delay or considerat­ion.

“We don’t want to see new forms of discrimina­tion in place of old ones that are rightly gone,” he said.

He said “injustices are happening this day”, noting the case of Catholic Archbishop of Hobart Julian Porteous and a Canberra women who was sacked from her work after a No post on Facebook.

“Do we want today to be a day of unity, or do we want today to be a day of division?” Mr Abbott said.

Archbishop Porteous was referred to the Australian Anti-Discrimina­tion Commission­er over a booklet distribute­d to school families entitled Don’t Mess With Marriage. The complaint was eventually withdrawn.

Mr Abbott also rose to defend subsequent­ly defeated amendments from Liberal MP Michael Sukkar that would have created two categories of marriage – between a man and a woman, and between two people – and given new celebrants the ability to refuse to marry couples if they held a “genuine religious or conscienti­ous belief”.

Pointing out that almost five million people in Australia had voted No to same-sex marriage, Mr Abbott said the amendment for two categories of

marriage respected “traditiona­l marriage while allowing same sex marriage to take place”.

He said protection­s for freedom of conscience, religion and parental choice would make the bill a “unifying occasion”.

Earlier, Mr Abbott moved a rare “pious amendment”

that would have halted debate and forced it to start again.

Liberal MP Warren Entsch gave a final second reading speech on the bill and said a clerk had confirmed the Abbott amendment would “stop the progress of the bill”.

The amendment failed.

 ?? PHOTO: MICK TSIKAS/AAP ?? RUNNING AGAINST THE TIDE: Former prime minister Tony Abbott speaks during debate of the Marriage Amendment Bill in the lower house yesterday.
PHOTO: MICK TSIKAS/AAP RUNNING AGAINST THE TIDE: Former prime minister Tony Abbott speaks during debate of the Marriage Amendment Bill in the lower house yesterday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia